NCERT Solutions for Class 12 Physics Chapter 9 - Ray Optics And Optical Instruments

• Reflection is governed by the equation ∠i = ∠r′ and refraction by the Snell’s law, $\frac{\sin i}{\sin r}=\mu $ , where the incident ray, reflected ray, refracted ray and normal lie in the same plane, ⎧ is the refractive index of glass medium.

• The critical angle of incidence C for a ray incident from a denser to rarer medium, is that angle for which the angle of refraction is 90°. For i > C, total internal reflection occurs.

• Cartesian sign convention: Distance measured in the same direction as the incident light are positive; those measured in the opposite direction are negative.  All distances are measured from the pole/optical centre of the mirror/lens on the principal axis. The heights measured upwards above x-axis and normal to the principal axis of the mirror/lens are taken as positive. The heights measured downwards are taken as negative. 

• Mirror equation:

$\frac{1}{v}+\frac{1}{u} = \frac{1}{f}$

where u and v are object and image distances, respectively and f is the focal length of the mirror. f is (approximately) half the radius of curvature R. f is negative for concave mirror; f is positive for a convex mirror.

• For a prism of the angle A, of refractive index  $\mu_2$ placed in a medium of refractive index $\mu_1$, 

$\mu_{21}=\frac{\mu_2}{\mu_1}=\frac{\sin \left [ \frac{(A + \delta_m)}{2} \right ]}{sin\left (\frac{A}{2}  \right )}$

where $\delta_m$ is the angle of minimum deviation.

• For refraction through a spherical interface (from medium 1 to 2 of refractive index

  $\mu _{1}$ and $\mu _{2}$ , respectively 

$\frac{\mu_2}{v}-\frac{\mu_1}{u}=\frac{\mu_2 - \mu_1}{R}$

Thin lens formula

$\frac{1}{v}-\frac{1}{u}=\frac{1}{f}$

Lens maker’s formula

$\frac{1}{f}=\frac{\mu_2 - \mu_1}{\mu_1}\left ( \frac{1}{R_1}-\frac{1}{R_2} \right )$

where, f is positive for a converging lens; f is negative for a diverging lens. 

• The power of a lens $P=\frac{1}{f}$. 

The SI unit for power of a lens is dioptre (D) 

1 D = 1 m–1 .

If several thin lenses of focal length f1 , f2 , f3 ,.. are in contact, the effective focal length of their combination, is given by $\frac{1}{f}=\frac{1}{f_1}+\frac{1}{f_2}+\frac{1}{f_3}+...$

The total power of a combination of several lenses is

P = P1 + P2 + P3 + …

• Dispersion is the splitting of light into its constituent color.

• Magnifying power m of a simple microscope is given by $m=1+\frac{D}{f}$,where D = 25 cm is the least distance of distinct vision and f is the focal length of the convex lens. 

If the image is at infinity, $m=\frac{D}{f}$. 

• For a compound microscope, the  magnifying power is  given by $m=m_e\times m_0$, where $m_e = 1+\frac{D}{f_e}$, is the magnification due to the eyepiece  and $m_0$ is  the  magnification  produced  by  the  objective. Approximately,

$m=\frac{L}{f_0}=\frac{D}{f_e}$

where fo and fe are the focal lengths of the objective and eyepiece, respectively, and L is the distance between their focal points.

• Magnifying power m of a telescope is the ratio of the angle ® subtended at the eye by the image to the angle 〈 subtended at the eye by the object. 

$m=\frac{\beta}{\alpha}=\frac{f_0}{f_e}$

where fo and fe are the focal lengths of the objective and eyepiece, respectively.

Access NCERT Solutions For Class 12 Physics  Chapter 9 – Ray Optics and Optical Instruments

1. A small candle, \[2.5\text{ }cm\] in size is placed at \[27\text{ }cm\] in front of a concave mirror of radius of curvature \[36cm\]. At what distance from the mirror should a screen be placed in order to obtain a sharp image? Describe the nature and size of the image. If the candle is moved closer to the mirror, how would the screen have to be moved?

Ans: We have,

Size of the candle, $h=2.5cm$

Let image size $=h'$

Object distance, $u=-27cm$

concave mirror’s curvature radius, $R=-36cm$

Focal length of the concave mirror, $f=\frac{R}{2}=-18cm$

Using mirror formula,

$\frac{1}{u}+\frac{1}{v}=\frac{1}{f}$

$\Rightarrow \frac{1}{v}=\frac{1}{f}-\frac{1}{u}$

Where, u is the object distance, 

v is the image distance and 

f is the focal length.

Now, we put given values,

$\Rightarrow \frac{1}{v}=\frac{1}{-18}-\frac{1}{-27}$

$\Rightarrow \frac{1}{v}=\frac{-3+2}{54}$

$\Rightarrow \frac{1}{v}=\frac{-1}{54}$

$\Rightarrow v=-54cm$

Therefore, the screen should be 54 cm away from the mirror to get a sharp image.

The formula for magnification of image is given by:

$m=\frac{h'}{h}=-\frac{v}{u}$

$\therefore h'=-\frac{v}{u}\times h$

$\Rightarrow h'=-\frac{-54}{-27}\times 2.5$

$\Rightarrow h'=-5cm$

The height of the image of the candle is \[5\text{ }cm\]. The negative sign shows that the image is inverted and real.

If the candle is moved nearer to the mirror, then the screen will have to be moved far from the mirror in order to get the image.

2. A \[\mathbf{4}.\mathbf{5}\text{ }\mathbf{cm}\] needle is placed \[\mathbf{12cm}\] away from a convex mirror of focal length \[\mathbf{15cm}\]. Give the location of the image and the magnification. Describe what happens as the needle is moved farther from the mirror.

Ans: Given that,

Height of the needle, \[{{h}_{1}}\text{ }=\text{ }4.5cm\]

Object distance, \[u\text{ }=\text{ }-12cm\]

Focal length of the convex mirror, \[f\text{ }=\text{ }15cm\]

Image distance \[=\text{ }v\]

Using mirror formula,

$\frac{1}{u}+\frac{1}{v}=\frac{1}{f}$

$\Rightarrow \frac{1}{v}=\frac{1}{f}-\frac{1}{u}$

Now, we put given values,

$\Rightarrow \frac{1}{v}=\frac{1}{15}-\frac{1}{-12}$

$\Rightarrow \frac{1}{v}=\frac{4+5}{60}$

$\Rightarrow \frac{1}{v}=\frac{9}{60}$

$\Rightarrow v=6.7cm$

Hence, the needle’s image is \[6.7\text{ }cm\] away from the mirror and it is on the mirror’s other side.

The formula for magnification of image is given by:

$m=\frac{{{h}_{2}}}{{{h}_{1}}}=-\frac{v}{u}$

$\therefore {{h}_{2}}=-\frac{v}{u}\times {{h}_{1}}$

$\Rightarrow {{h}_{2}}=-\frac{6.7}{-12}\times 4.5$

$\Rightarrow {{h}_{2}}=2.5cm$

The image’s height is 2.5cm. The positive sign shows that the image is virtual, erect, and diminished.

If the needle is moved away from the mirror, the image will also move farther from the mirror, and the size of the image will decrease gradually.

3. A tank is filled with water to a height of \[\mathbf{12}.\mathbf{5}\text{ }\mathbf{cm}\]. The apparent depth of a needle lying at the bottom of the tank is measured by a microscope to be \[\mathbf{9}.\mathbf{4cm}\]. What is the refractive index of water? If water is replaced by a liquid of refractive index \[\mathbf{1}.\mathbf{63}\] up to the same height, by what distance would the microscope have to be moved to focus on the needle again?

Ans: Given that,

Actual depth of the needle in water, \[{{h}_{1}}=12.5cm\]

Apparent depth of the needle in water, \[{{h}_{2}}=9.4cm\]

Refractive index of water $=\mu $

The formula for refractive index is given by:

$\mu =\frac{{{h}_{1}}}{{{h}_{2}}}$

Put the given values,

$\mu =\frac{12.5}{9.4}$

$\mu \approx 1.33$

Hence, the water’s refractive index is about \[1.33\].

When water is replaced by a liquid of refractive index, $\mu '=1.63$.

The actual depth of the needle will be the same, but it's apparent depth will vary.

Let \[y\] be the new apparent depth of the needle. 

We will use the relation given below:

$\mu '=\frac{{{h}_{1}}}{y}$

$\therefore y=\frac{{{h}_{1}}}{\mu '}$

$\Rightarrow y=\frac{12.5}{1.63}$

$\Rightarrow y=7.67cm$

We get the new apparent depth of the needle to be \[7.67cm\]. It is less than ${{h}_{2}}$. Therefore, the microscope should be moved up to focus the needle again.

The distance by which the microscope would be moved up\[=\text{ }9.4\text{ }-\text{ }7.67\text{ }=\text{ }1.73cm\].

4. Figures (a) and (b) show the refraction of a ray in air incident at \[\mathbf{60}{}^\circ \] with the normal to a glass-air and water-air interface, respectively. Predict the angle of refraction in a glass when the angle of incidence in water is \[\mathbf{45}{}^\circ \] with the normal to a water-glass interface (figure (c)).

Ans: Given that,

For the glass -air interface,

Angle of incidence, \[i=\text{ }60{}^\circ \]

Angle of refraction, $r=35{}^\circ $

We can use Snell’s law,

$\mu _{g}^{a}=\frac{\sin i}{\sin r}$

$\Rightarrow \mu _{g}^{a}=\frac{\sin 60{}^\circ }{\sin 35{}^\circ }$

$\Rightarrow \mu _{g}^{a}=1.51$……(i)

For the air-water interface,

Angle of incidence, \[i=\text{ }60{}^\circ \]

Angle of refraction, $r=47{}^\circ $

We can use Snell’s law,

$\mu _{w}^{a}=\frac{\sin i}{\sin r}$

$\Rightarrow \mu _{w}^{a}=\frac{\sin 60{}^\circ }{\sin 47{}^\circ }$

$\Rightarrow \mu _{w}^{a}=1.184$……(ii)

Using (i) and (ii), the relative refractive index of glass with respect to water can be derived as:

$\mu _{g}^{w}=\frac{\mu _{g}^{a}}{\mu _{w}^{a}}$

$\Rightarrow \mu _{g}^{w}=\frac{1.51}{1.184}$

$\Rightarrow \mu _{g}^{w}=1.275$

For the glass - water interface,

Angle of incidence, \[i=\text{ 45}{}^\circ \]

Angle of refraction, $=r$

We can use Snell’s law,

$\mu _{g}^{w}=\frac{\sin i}{\sin r}$

$\Rightarrow 1.275=\frac{\sin 45{}^\circ }{\sin r}$

$\Rightarrow \sin r=0.5546$

$\Rightarrow r={{\sin }^{-1}}(0.5546)$

\[\Rightarrow r=38.68{}^\circ \]

Hence, the angle of refraction at the water – glass interface is $38.68{}^\circ $.

5. A small bulb is placed at the bottom of a tank containing water to a depth of \[\mathbf{80}\text{ }\mathbf{cm}\]. What is the area of the surface of water through which light from the bulb can emerge out? Refractive index of water is \[\mathbf{1}.\mathbf{33}.\](Consider the bulb to be a point source.)

Ans: Provided that,

Bulb’s actual depth in water, ${{d}_{1}}=80cm=0.8m$

Water’s refractive index, \[\mu =1.33\]

The following diagram represents the given setup:

Where i is the Angle of incidence 

r is the Angle of refraction, $r=90{}^\circ $

As the bulb acts as a point source, the emergent light would be considered as a circle of radius, $R=\frac{AC}{2}=AO=OB$

Snell’s law may be used as follows:

$\mu =\frac{\sin r}{\sin i}$

$\Rightarrow 1.33=\frac{\sin 90{}^\circ }{\sin i}$

$\Rightarrow \sin i=\frac{1}{1.33}$

$\Rightarrow i=48.75{}^\circ $

Considering the given diagram, we have the relation:

$\tan i=\frac{OC}{OB}=\frac{R}{{{d}_{1}}}$

$\Rightarrow R=\tan 48.75{}^\circ \times 0.8$

$\Rightarrow R=0.91m$

Area of the surface of water $=\pi {{R}^{2}}=\pi {{(0.91)}^{2}}=2.61{{m}^{2}}$

Clearly, the area of the water surface through which the light from the bulb could project is about $2.61{{m}^{2}}$.

6. A prism is made of glass of unknown refractive index. A parallel beam of light is incident on a face of the prism. The angle of minimum deviation is measured to be \[\mathbf{40}{}^\circ \]. What is the refractive index of the material of the prism? The refracting angle of the prism is \[\mathbf{60}{}^\circ \]. If the prism is placed in water (refractive index \[\mathbf{1}.\mathbf{33}\]), predict the new angle of minimum deviation of a parallel beam of light.

Ans:  The minimum deviation angle and the angle of the prism is as shown in the figure given below: 

Angle of minimum deviation, ${{\delta }_{m}}=40{}^\circ $ 

Angle of the prism, $A=60{}^\circ $

Refractive index of water, $\mu =1.33$

Refractive index of the material of the prism $=\mu '$

The relation between angle of deviation with refractive index is given by:

$\mu '=\frac{\sin \left( \frac{A+{{\delta }_{m}}}{2} \right)}{\sin \left( \frac{A}{2} \right)}$

$\Rightarrow \mu '=\frac{\sin \left( \frac{60{}^\circ +40{}^\circ }{2} \right)}{\sin \left( \frac{60{}^\circ }{2} \right)}=\frac{\sin 50{}^\circ }{\sin 30{}^\circ }$

$\Rightarrow \mu '=1.532$

Hence, the refractive index of the prism is \[1.532\].

Since the prism is placed in water, let $\delta {{'}_{m}}$ be the new angle of minimum deviation for the same prism. 

The below figure shows the angle of the prism and the unknown minimum deviation angle.

The refractive index of glass with respect to water is given by the relation:

$\mu _{g}^{w}=\frac{\mu '}{\mu }=\frac{\sin \left( \frac{A+\delta {{'}_{m}}}{2} \right)}{\sin \left( \frac{A}{2} \right)}$

$\Rightarrow \frac{\mu '}{\mu }\sin \left( \frac{A}{2} \right)=\sin \left( \frac{A+\delta {{'}_{m}}}{2} \right)$

$\Rightarrow \sin \left( \frac{A+\delta {{'}_{m}}}{2} \right)=\frac{1.532}{1.33}\sin \left( \frac{60{}^\circ }{2} \right)=0.5759$

$\Rightarrow \frac{A+\delta {{'}_{m}}}{2}={{\sin }^{-1}}\left( 0.5759 \right)=35.16{}^\circ $

$\Rightarrow 60{}^\circ +\delta {{'}_{m}}=70.32{}^\circ $

$\Rightarrow \delta {{'}_{m}}=10.32{}^\circ $

Hence, the new minimum angle of deviation is $10.32{}^\circ $.

7. Double-convex lenses are to be manufactured from a glass of refractive index \[\mathbf{1}.\mathbf{55}\], with both faces of the same radius of curvature. What is the radius of curvature required if the focal length is to be \[\mathbf{20}\text{ }\mathbf{cm}\]?

Ans: Given that,

Refractive index of glass, \[\mu =1.55\]

Focal length of the double-convex lens, \[f=20\text{ }cm\]

Radius of curvature of one face of the lens \[=\text{ }{{R}_{1}}\]

Radius of curvature of the other face of the lens \[=\text{ }{{R}_{2}}\]

Radius of curvature of the double-convex lens \[=\text{ }R\]

$\therefore {{R}_{1}}=R;\text{ }{{R}_{2}}=-R$

We can use this formula:

$\frac{1}{f}=\left( \mu -1 \right)\left[ \frac{1}{{{R}_{1}}}-\frac{1}{{{R}_{2}}} \right]$

$\Rightarrow \frac{1}{20}=\left( 1.55-1 \right)\left[ \frac{1}{R}+\frac{1}{R} \right]$

$\Rightarrow \frac{1}{20}=\left( 0.55 \right)\left[ \frac{2}{R} \right]$

$\therefore R=22cm$

Hence, the radius of curvature of the double-convex lens is $22cm$.

8. A beam of light converges at a point \[\mathbf{P}\]. Now a lens is placed in the path of the convergent beam \[\mathbf{12}\text{ }\mathbf{cm}\] from \[\mathbf{P}\]. At what point does the beam converge if the lens is 

a) a convex lens of focal length \[\mathbf{20cm}\]?

Ans: Consider the given setup of a convex lens of focal length 20cm.

Object distance, \[u=+12\text{ }cm\]

Focal length of the convex lens, \[f=20\text{ }cm\]

Image distance \[=v\]

Using lens formula,

$\frac{1}{v}-\frac{1}{u}=\frac{1}{f}$

$\Rightarrow \frac{1}{v}-\frac{1}{12}=\frac{1}{20}$

$\Rightarrow \frac{1}{v}=\frac{1}{20}+\frac{1}{12}=\frac{8}{60}$

$\Rightarrow v=\frac{60}{8}=7.5cm$

Clearly, the image is formed \[7.5cm\] away from the lens, toward its right.

b) a concave lens of focal length \[\mathbf{16cm}\]?

Ans: Consider the given setup of a concave lens of focal length 16cm.

Focal length of the concave lens, $f=-16cm$

Image distance \[=\text{ }v\]

Using lens formula,

$\frac{1}{v}-\frac{1}{u}=\frac{1}{f}$

$\Rightarrow \frac{1}{v}=-\frac{1}{16}+\frac{1}{12}$

$\Rightarrow \frac{1}{v}=\frac{-3+4}{48}$

$\Rightarrow \frac{1}{v}=\frac{1}{48}$

$\therefore v=48cm$

Clearly, the image is formed \[48cm\] away from the lens, toward its right.

9. An object of size \[\mathbf{3}.\mathbf{0}\text{ }\mathbf{cm}\] is placed \[\mathbf{14}\text{ }\mathbf{cm}\] in front of a concave lens of focal length \[\mathbf{21cm}\]. Describe the image produced by the lens. What happens if the object is moved further away from the lens?

Ans: Given that,

Size of the object, \[{{h}_{1}}=3\text{ }cm\]

Object distance, \[u=-\text{ }14\text{ }cm\]

Focal length of the concave lens, \[f=-21\text{ }cm\]

Image distance \[=\text{ }v\]

Using lens formula,

$\frac{1}{v}-\frac{1}{u}=\frac{1}{f}$

$\Rightarrow \frac{1}{v}=-\frac{1}{21}-\frac{1}{14}$

$\Rightarrow \frac{1}{v}=\frac{-2-3}{42}$

$\Rightarrow \frac{1}{v}=\frac{-5}{42}$

$\therefore v=\frac{-42}{5}=-8.4cm$

Hence, the image is formed on the same side of the lens as the object, \[8.4\text{ }cm\] away from it. The negative sign indicates that the image is erect and virtual. 

The formula for magnification of the image is given as:

$m=\frac{{{h}_{2}}}{{{h}_{1}}}=\frac{v}{u}$

$\therefore {{h}_{2}}=\frac{-8.4}{-14}\times 3=1.8cm$

$\Rightarrow {{h}_{2}}=1.8cm$

Hence, the height of the image is \[1.8\text{ }cm.\]

If the object is moved further away from the lens, then the virtual image will move towards the lens focus, but not beyond it. The image size will decrease with the increase in the distance of the object.

10. What is the focal length of a convex lens of focal length \[\mathbf{30}\text{ }\mathbf{cm}\] in contact with a concave lens of focal length \[\mathbf{20}\text{ }\mathbf{cm}\]? Is the system a converging or a diverging lens? Ignore thickness of the lenses.

Ans: Given that,

Focal length of the convex lens, \[{{f}_{1}}=30\text{ }cm\]

Focal length of the concave lens, \[{{f}_{2}}=-20\text{ }cm\]

Focal length of the system of lenses \[=\text{ }f\]

The equivalent focal length of two lenses system in contact is given by:

$\frac{1}{f}=\frac{1}{{{f}_{1}}}+\frac{1}{{{f}_{2}}}$

$\Rightarrow \frac{1}{f}=\frac{1}{30}-\frac{1}{20}=\frac{-1}{60}$

$\Rightarrow f=-60cm$

Hence, the focal length of the combination of lenses is \[60\text{ }cm\]. The negative sign shows that the system of lenses acts as a diverging lens.

11. A compound microscope consists of an objective lens of focal length \[\mathbf{2}.\mathbf{0}\text{ }\mathbf{cm}\] and an eyepiece of focal length \[\mathbf{6}.\mathbf{25}\text{ }\mathbf{cm}\] separated by a distance of \[\mathbf{15}\text{ }\mathbf{cm}\]. How far from the objective should an object be placed in order to obtain the final image at: 

a) the least distance of distinct vision (\[\mathbf{25}\text{ }\mathbf{cm}\])? What is the magnifying power of the microscope?

Ans: Given that,

Focal length of the objective lens, \[{{f}_{1}}=2.0\text{ }cm\]

Focal length of the eyepiece, \[{{f}_{2}}=\text{ }6.25\text{ }cm\]

Distance between the objective lens and the eyepiece, \[d\text{ }=\text{ }15\text{ }cm\]

Least distance of distinct vision, \[d'\text{ }=\text{ }25\text{ }cm\]

lmage distance for the eyepiece, \[{{v}_{2}}=-25\text{ }cm\]

Object distance for the eyepiece \[=\text{ }{{u}_{2}}\]

Using lens formula,

$\frac{1}{{{v}_{2}}}-\frac{1}{{{u}_{2}}}=\frac{1}{{{f}_{2}}}$

$\Rightarrow \frac{1}{{{u}_{2}}}=\frac{1}{{{v}_{2}}}-\frac{1}{{{f}_{2}}}$

$\Rightarrow \frac{1}{{{u}_{2}}}=\frac{1}{-25}-\frac{1}{6.25}$

$\Rightarrow \frac{1}{{{u}_{2}}}=\frac{-5}{25}$

$\Rightarrow {{u}_{2}}=-5cm$

The distance of image for the objective lens, ${{v}_{1}}=d+{{u}_{2}}=15-5=10cm$.

The distance of object for the objective lens $={{u}_{1}}$

Using lens formula,

$\frac{1}{{{v}_{1}}}-\frac{1}{{{u}_{1}}}=\frac{1}{{{f}_{1}}}$

$\Rightarrow \frac{1}{{{u}_{1}}}=\frac{1}{{{v}_{1}}}-\frac{1}{{{f}_{1}}}$

$\Rightarrow \frac{1}{{{u}_{1}}}=\frac{1}{10}-\frac{1}{2}$

$\Rightarrow \frac{1}{{{u}_{1}}}=\frac{-4}{10}$

$\Rightarrow {{u}_{1}}=-2.5cm$

Magnitude of the object distance, $|{{u}_{1}}|=2.5cm$.

The compound microscope’s magnifying power is given by the relation:

$m=\frac{{{v}_{1}}}{|{{u}_{1}}|}\left( 1+\frac{d'}{{{f}_{2}}} \right)$

$\Rightarrow m=\frac{10}{2.5}\left( 1+\frac{25}{6.25} \right)$

$\Rightarrow m=4(1+4)=20$

Hence, the magnifying power of the microscope is $20$.

b) at infinity? What is the magnifying power of the microscope?

Ans: Given that, the final image is formed at infinity.

The distance of image of the eyepiece, ${{v}_{2}}=\infty $ 

The distance of object of the eyepiece $={{u}_{2}}$

Using lens formula,

$\frac{1}{{{v}_{2}}}-\frac{1}{{{u}_{2}}}=\frac{1}{{{f}_{2}}}$

$\Rightarrow \frac{1}{{{u}_{2}}}=\frac{1}{{{v}_{2}}}-\frac{1}{{{f}_{2}}}$

$\Rightarrow \frac{1}{{{u}_{2}}}=\frac{1}{\infty }-\frac{1}{6.25}$

$\Rightarrow {{u}_{2}}=-6.25cm$

The distance of image for the objective lens, ${{v}_{1}}=d+{{u}_{2}}=15-6.25=8.75cm$.

The distance of object for the objective lens $={{u}_{1}}$

Using lens formula,

$\frac{1}{{{v}_{1}}}-\frac{1}{{{u}_{1}}}=\frac{1}{{{f}_{1}}}$

$\Rightarrow \frac{1}{{{u}_{1}}}=\frac{1}{{{v}_{1}}}-\frac{1}{{{f}_{1}}}$

$\Rightarrow \frac{1}{{{u}_{1}}}=\frac{1}{8.75}-\frac{1}{2}$

$\Rightarrow {{u}_{1}}=-2.59cm$

Magnitude of the object distance, $|{{u}_{1}}|=2.59cm$.

The compound microscope’s magnifying power is given by the relation:

$m=\frac{{{v}_{1}}}{|{{u}_{1}}|}\left( \frac{d'}{|{{u}_{2}}|} \right)$

$\Rightarrow m=\frac{8.75}{2.59}\left( \frac{25}{6.25} \right)$

$\Rightarrow m=13.51$

Hence, the magnifying power of the microscope is $13.51$.

12. A person with a normal near point (\[\mathbf{25}\text{ }\mathbf{cm}\]) using a compound microscope with objective of focal length \[\mathbf{8}.\mathbf{0}\text{ }\mathbf{mm}\] and an eyepiece of focal length \[\mathbf{2}.\mathbf{5}\text{ }\mathbf{cm}\] can bring an object placed at \[\mathbf{9}.\mathbf{0}\text{ }\mathbf{mm}\] from the objective in sharp focus. What is the separation between the two lenses? Calculate the magnifying power of the microscope.

Ans: Given that,

Focal length of the objective lens, \[{{f}_{o}}=8\text{ }mm=0.8\text{ }cm\]

Focal length of the eyepiece, \[{{f}_{e}}=2.5\text{ }cm\]

The distance of the object for the Objective lens, \[{{u}_{o}}=-9.0\text{ }mm=-0.9\text{ }cm\]

Least distance of distant vision, \[d=25\text{ }cm\]

Image distance for the eyepiece, \[{{v}_{e}}=-d=-25\text{ }cm\]

Object distance for the eyepiece, ${{u}_{e}}$

Using lens formula,

$\frac{1}{{{v}_{e}}}-\frac{1}{{{u}_{e}}}=\frac{1}{{{f}_{e}}}$

$\Rightarrow \frac{1}{{{u}_{e}}}=\frac{1}{{{v}_{e}}}-\frac{1}{{{f}_{e}}}$

$\Rightarrow \frac{1}{{{u}_{e}}}=\frac{1}{-25}-\frac{1}{2.5}$

$\Rightarrow \frac{1}{{{u}_{e}}}=\frac{-11}{25}$

$\Rightarrow {{u}_{e}}=-2.27cm$

Using lens formula, we can obtain image distance for the objective lens,${{v}_{o}}$, is given by:

$\frac{1}{{{v}_{o}}}-\frac{1}{{{u}_{o}}}=\frac{1}{{{f}_{o}}}$

$\Rightarrow \frac{1}{{{v}_{o}}}=\frac{1}{{{u}_{o}}}+\frac{1}{{{f}_{o}}}$

$\Rightarrow \frac{1}{{{v}_{o}}}=\frac{1}{0.8}-\frac{1}{0.9}$

$\Rightarrow \frac{1}{{{v}_{o}}}=\frac{0.1}{0.72}$

$\Rightarrow {{v}_{o}}=7.2cm$

The distance between the objective lens and the eyepiece,  $|{{u}_{e}}|+{{v}_{o}}=2.27+7.2=9.47cm$

The microscope’s magnifying power is given by the relation:

$m=\frac{{{v}_{o}}}{|{{u}_{o}}|}\left( 1+\frac{d}{{{f}_{e}}} \right)$

$\Rightarrow m=\frac{7.2}{0.9}\left( 1+\frac{25}{2.5} \right)$

$\Rightarrow m=8(1+10)=88$

Hence, the magnifying power of the microscope is $88$.

13. A small telescope has an objective lens of focal length \[\mathbf{144}\text{ }\mathbf{cm}\] and an eyepiece of focal length \[\mathbf{6}.\mathbf{0}\text{ }\mathbf{cm}\]. What is the magnifying power of the telescope? What is the separation between the objective and the eyepiece?

Ans: Given that,

Focal length of the objective lens, \[{{f}_{o}}=144\text{ }cm\]

Focal length of the eyepiece, \[{{f}_{e}}=6.0\text{ }cm\]

The telescope’s magnifying power is given by:

$m=\frac{{{f}_{o}}}{{{f}_{e}}}$

$\Rightarrow m=\frac{144}{6}$

$\Rightarrow m=24$

The separation between the objective lens and the eyepiece is given by:

$x={{f}_{o}}+{{f}_{e}}$

$\Rightarrow x=144+6=150cm$

Hence, the magnifying power of the telescope is \[24\] and the distance between the objective lens and the eyepieces is \[150cm\].

14. 

a) A giant refracting telescope at an observatory has an objective lens of focal length \[\mathbf{15}\text{ }\mathbf{m}\]. If an eyepiece of focal length \[\mathbf{1}.\mathbf{0}\text{ }\mathbf{cm}\] is used, what is the angular magnification of the telescope?

Ans: Given that,

Focal length of the objective lens, \[{{f}_{o}}=15m=15\times 100=1500cm\]

Focal length of the eyepiece, \[{{f}_{e}}=\text{ }1.0\text{ }cm\]

The telescope’s angular magnification is given as:

$\alpha =\frac{{{f}_{o}}}{{{f}_{e}}}$

$\Rightarrow \alpha =\frac{1500}{1}=1500$

Hence, the refracting telescope’s angular magnification is \[1500.\]

b) If this telescope is used to view the moon, what is the diameter of the image of the moon formed by the objective lens? The diameter of the moon is \[\mathbf{3}.\mathbf{48}\text{ }\times \text{ }\mathbf{1}{{\mathbf{0}}^{6}}\text{ }\mathbf{m}\], and the radius of lunar orbit is \[\mathbf{3}.\mathbf{8}\text{ }\times \text{ }\mathbf{1}{{\mathbf{0}}^{8}}\text{ }\mathbf{m}\].

Ans: Given that,

Diameter of the moon, \[{{d}_{o}}=3.48\times {{10}^{6}}m\]

Radius of the lunar orbit, \[{{r}_{o}}=3.8\times {{10}^{8}}m\]

Let \[d'\] be the diameter of the moon image formed by the objective lens.

The angle subtended by the moon’s diameter is equal to the angle subtended by the image.

$\frac{{{d}_{o}}}{{{r}_{o}}}=\frac{d'}{{{f}_{o}}}$

\[\Rightarrow \frac{3.48\times {{10}^{6}}}{3.8\times {{10}^{8}}}=\frac{d'}{15}\]

$\Rightarrow d'=13.74\times {{10}^{-2}}m=13.74cm$

Hence, the diameter of the moon’s image formed by the objective lens is \[13.74\text{ }cm\].

15. Use the mirror equation to deduce that: 

a) an object placed between \[\mathbf{f}\] and \[~\mathbf{2f}\] of a concave mirror produces a real image beyond \[\mathbf{2f}\].

Ans: For a concave mirror, $f<0$.

When the object is placed on the left side of the mirror, then $u<0$.

Using mirror formula,

$\frac{1}{u}+\frac{1}{v}=\frac{1}{f}$

$\Rightarrow \frac{1}{v}=\frac{1}{f}-\frac{1}{u}$……(1)

If the object placed between $f$ and $2f$ $i.e.,2f<u<f$:

$\Rightarrow \frac{1}{2f}>\frac{1}{u}>\frac{1}{f}$

$\Rightarrow -\frac{1}{2f}<-\frac{1}{u}<-\frac{1}{f}$

$\Rightarrow \frac{1}{f}-\frac{1}{2f}<\frac{1}{f}-\frac{1}{u}<0$……(2)

Using equation (1), we get

$\Rightarrow \frac{1}{2f}<\frac{1}{v}<0$

Since $\frac{1}{v}$ is negative, $v$ is negative.

$\Rightarrow \frac{1}{2f}<\frac{1}{v}$

$\Rightarrow 2f>v$

$\Rightarrow -v>-2f$

Therefore, image will lie beyond $2f$.

b) a convex mirror always produces a virtual image independent of the location of the object.

Ans: For a convex mirror, $f>0$.

When the object is placed on the left side of the mirror, then $u<0$.

Using mirror formula,

$\frac{1}{u}+\frac{1}{v}=\frac{1}{f}$

$\Rightarrow \frac{1}{v}=\frac{1}{f}-\frac{1}{u}$

Using equation (2), we get:

$\frac{1}{v}<0$

$\Rightarrow v>0$

Thus, the image is formed on the mirror’s backside. 

Hence, a convex mirror always gives a virtual image, regardless of the object distance.

c) the virtual image produced by a convex mirror is always diminished in size and is located between the focus and the pole.

Ans: For a convex mirror, $f>0$.

Using mirror formula,

$\frac{1}{u}+\frac{1}{v}=\frac{1}{f}$

$\Rightarrow \frac{1}{v}=\frac{1}{f}-\frac{1}{u}$

But we have, $u<0$

$\therefore \frac{1}{v}>\frac{1}{f}$

$\Rightarrow v<f$

Hence, the image formed is diminished and is located between the focus and the pole.

d) An object placed between the pole and the focus of a concave mirror produces a virtual and enlarged image.

Ans: For a concave mirror, $f<0$.

When the object is placed on the left side of the mirror, then $u<0$.

The object is placed between the focus and the pole.

$\therefore f>u>0$

$\Rightarrow \frac{1}{f}<\frac{1}{u}<0$

$\Rightarrow \frac{1}{f}-\frac{1}{u}<0$

$\therefore \frac{1}{v}<0$

$\Rightarrow v>0$

The image is formed on the mirror’s right side. Hence, it is a virtual image.

For $u<0,v>0$ 

$\Rightarrow \frac{1}{u}>\frac{1}{v}$

$\Rightarrow v>u$

Magnification, $m=\frac{v}{u}>1$

Hence, the formed image is enlarged.

16. A small pin fixed on a tabletop is viewed from above from a distance of \[\mathbf{50}\text{ }\mathbf{cm}\]. By what distance would the pin appear to be raised if it is viewed from the same point through a \[\mathbf{15}\text{ }\mathbf{cm}\] thick glass slab held parallel to the table? Refractive index of glass \[\mathbf{1}.\mathbf{5}\]. Does the answer depend on the location of the slab?

Ans: According to the question, 

Actual depth of the pin, \[d=15\text{ }cm\]

Apparent depth of the pin \[=d'\]

Refractive index of glass, $\mu =1.5$

The refractive index of glass is equal to the ratio of actual depth to the apparent depth, that is,

$\mu =\frac{d}{d'}$

$\therefore d'=\frac{d}{\mu }$

$\Rightarrow d'=\frac{15}{1.5}=10cm$

The distance at which the pin appears to be raised $=d'-d=15-10=5cm$.

For a small incidence angle, this distance does not depend upon the slab location.

17. 

a) Figure shows a cross-section of a 'light pipe' made of a glass fibre of refractive index \[\mathbf{1}.\mathbf{68}\]. The outer covering of the pipe is made of a material of refractive index \[\mathbf{1}.\mathbf{44}\]. What is the range of the angles of the incident rays with the axis of the pipe for which total reflections inside the pipe take place, as shown in the figure?

Ans: Given that,

Refractive index of the glass fibre, ${{\mu }_{1}}=1.68$

Refractive index of the outer covering of the pipe, ${{\mu }_{2}}=1.44$

Angle of incidence \[=\text{ }i\]

Angle Of refraction \[=\text{ }r\]

Angle of incidence at the interface \[=\text{ }i'\]

The refractive index ($\mu $) of the inner core - outer core interface is given as:

$\mu =\frac{{{\mu }_{2}}}{{{\mu }_{1}}}=\frac{1}{\sin i'}$

\[\Rightarrow \sin i'=\frac{{{\mu }_{1}}}{{{\mu }_{2}}}\]

\[\Rightarrow \sin i'=\frac{1.44}{1.68}=0.8571\]

For the critical angle, total internal reflection (TIR) takes place only when $i>i'$.

That is, when $i>59{}^\circ $.

Maximum angle of reflection, ${{r}_{\max }}=90{}^\circ -i'=90{}^\circ -59{}^\circ =31{}^\circ $.

Let ${{i}_{\max }}$ be the maximum incidence angle.

The refractive index at the air – glass interface, ${{\mu }_{1}}=1.68$.

We can use the relation for the maximum angles of incidence and reflection as:

${{\mu }_{1}}=\frac{\sin {{i}_{\max }}}{\sin {{r}_{\max }}}$

\[\Rightarrow \sin {{i}_{\max }}={{\mu }_{1}}\times \sin {{r}_{\max }}\]

\[\Rightarrow \sin {{i}_{\max }}=1.68\times \sin 31{}^\circ \]

\[\Rightarrow \sin {{i}_{\max }}=0.8652\]

\[\Rightarrow {{i}_{\max }}\approx 60{}^\circ \]

Thus, all the ray’s incident at angles lying in the range $0<i<60{}^\circ $  will suffer total internal reflection.

b) What is the answer if there is no outer covering of the pipe?

Ans: If the outer covering of the pipe is not present, then:

Refractive index of the outer pipe $={{\mu }_{1}}$

Refractive index of air \[=\text{ }1\]

For the angle of incidence  \[i\text{ =}90{}^\circ \], we can use Snell’s law at the air – pipe interface as

${{\mu }_{2}}=\frac{\sin i}{\sin r}$

$\Rightarrow 1.68=\frac{\sin 90{}^\circ }{\sin r}$

$\Rightarrow \sin r=\frac{1}{1.68}$

$\Rightarrow r=36.5{}^\circ $

$\therefore i'=90{}^\circ -36.5{}^\circ =53.5{}^\circ $

Since, $i'>r$, all incident rays will suffer total internal reflection.

18. Answer the following questions: 

a) You have learnt that plane and convex mirrors produce virtual images of objects. Can they produce real images under some circumstances? Explain.

Ans: Yes. Plane and convex mirrors can provide real images as well. 

If the light rays converging at a point behind a plane mirror (or a convex mirror) are reflected on a screen placed in front of the mirror, then an actual image will be formed.

b) A Virtual image, we always say, cannot be caught on a screen. Yet when we ‘see' a virtual image, we are obviously bringing it on to the ‘screen' (i.e., the retina) of our eye. Is there a contradiction?

Ans: No. A virtual image is made when light rays diverge. 

The convex lens of the eye makes these divergent rays converge at the retina. The virtual image works as an object for the lens to provide an actual image in this situation.

c) A diver underwater, looks obliquely at a fisherman standing on the bank of a lake. Would the fisherman look taller or shorter to the diver than what he actually is?

Ans: The diver is in the water, and the fisherman is on the land. Water is a denser medium than air. 

It is provided that the diver is viewing the fisherman. This shows that the light rays are travelling from a denser medium to a rarer medium. 

Hence, the refracted rays will go away from the normal. As a result, the fisherman will seem to be taller.

d) Does the apparent depth of a tank of water change if viewed obliquely? If so, does the apparent depth increase or decrease?

Ans: Yes, the apparent depth decreases. The tank's apparent depth of water varies when viewed obliquely. 

This is because the light deviates on traveling from one medium to another. The tank's apparent depth, when viewed obliquely, is less than the near-normal viewing.

e) The refractive index of diamond is much greater than that of ordinary glass. Is this fact of some use to a diamond cutter?

Ans: The diamond's refractive index is more than that of ordinary glass. 

The critical angle for diamond is smaller than that for glass. 

A diamond cutter utilizes a large angle of incidence to guarantee that the light entering the diamond is totally reflected from its face. This is the cause for the sparkling effect of a diamond.

19. The image of a small electric bulb fixed on the wall of a room is to be obtained on the opposite wall \[\mathbf{3}\text{ }\mathbf{m}\] away by means of a large convex lens. What is the maximum possible focal length of the lens required for the purpose?

Ans: Given that,

Distance between the object and the image, \[d=3\text{ }m\]

Maximum focal length of the convex lens $={{f}_{\max }}$ 

The maximum focal length is given by for real image:

${{f}_{\max }}=\frac{d}{4}$

$\Rightarrow {{f}_{\max }}=\frac{3}{4}=0.75m$

Hence, for the required purpose, the maximum possible focal length of the convex lens is \[0.75\text{ }m.\]

20. A screen is placed \[\mathbf{90}\text{ }\mathbf{cm}\] from an object. The image of the object on the screen is formed by a convex lens at two different locations separated by \[\mathbf{20}\text{ }\mathbf{cm}\]. Determine the focal length of the lens.

Ans: The figure shows the given arrangement of convex lens.

Here,

Distance between the image (screen) and the object, \[D\text{ }=\text{ }90\text{ }cm\].

Distance between two locations of the convex lens, \[d\text{ }=\text{ }20\text{ }cm\].

Focal length of the lens \[=\text{ }f\]

Focal length is related to \[d\] and \[D\] by:

$f=\frac{{{D}^{2}}-{{d}^{2}}}{4D}$

$\Rightarrow f=\frac{{{90}^{2}}-{{20}^{2}}}{4\times 90}=\frac{770}{36}$

$\Rightarrow f=21.39cm$

Clearly, the focal length of the convex lens is \[21.39cm.\]

21. 

a) Determine the 'effective focal length' of the combination of the two lenses in Exercise 9.10, if they are placed \[\mathbf{8}.\mathbf{0}\text{ }\mathbf{cm}\] apart with their principal axes coincident. Does the answer depend on which side of the combination a beam of parallel light is incident? Is the notion of effective focal length of this system useful at all?

Ans: Consider the diagram below which represents the combination of two lenses.

Here,

Focal length of the convex lens, \[{{f}_{1}}=30\text{ }cm\]

Focal length of the concave lens, \[{{f}_{2}}=-20\text{ }cm\]

Distance between the two lenses, \[d=8.0\text{ }cm\]

First, consider the case when the parallel beam of light falls on the convex lens.

Using lens formula, 

$\frac{1}{{{v}_{1}}}-\frac{1}{{{u}_{1}}}=\frac{1}{{{f}_{1}}}$

Where, object distance, ${{u}_{1}}=\infty $

Image distance $={{v}_{1}}$

$\Rightarrow \frac{1}{{{v}_{1}}}=\frac{1}{30}-\frac{1}{\infty }=\frac{1}{30}$

$\Rightarrow {{v}_{1}}=30cm$

The image will serve as a virtual object for the concave lens.

Using lens formula, 

$\frac{1}{{{v}_{2}}}-\frac{1}{{{u}_{2}}}=\frac{1}{{{f}_{2}}}$

Where, object distance $={{u}_{2}}$.

${{u}_{2}}=30-8=22cm$

Image distance $={{v}_{2}}$.

$\Rightarrow \frac{1}{{{v}_{2}}}=\frac{1}{22}-\frac{1}{20}=\frac{-1}{220}$

$\Rightarrow {{v}_{2}}=-220cm$

The parallel incident beam seems to diverge from a point, that is, $220-\frac{d}{2}=220-4=216cm$ from the centre of the combination of the two lenses.

Secondly, when the parallel beam of light falls, from the left, on the concave lens;

Using lens formula, 

$\frac{1}{{{v}_{2}}}-\frac{1}{{{u}_{2}}}=\frac{1}{{{f}_{2}}}$

Where, object distance, ${{u}_{2}}=-\infty $.

Image distance $={{v}_{2}}$.

$\Rightarrow \frac{1}{{{v}_{2}}}=\frac{1}{-20}-\frac{1}{\infty }=\frac{1}{-20}$

$\Rightarrow {{v}_{2}}=-20cm$

The image will serve as a real object for the convex lens.

Using lens formula, 

$\frac{1}{{{v}_{1}}}-\frac{1}{{{u}_{1}}}=\frac{1}{{{f}_{1}}}$

Where, object distance, $={{u}_{1}}$.

${{u}_{1}}=-(20+8)=-28cm$.

Image distance $={{v}_{1}}$.

$\Rightarrow \frac{1}{{{v}_{1}}}=\frac{1}{30}+\frac{1}{-28}=\frac{-1}{420}$

$\Rightarrow {{v}_{1}}=-420cm$

Hence, the parallel incident beam seems to diverge from a point, that is $=420-4=416cm$ from the left of the centre of the combination of the two lenses. 

Thus, the answer does depend on the combination side at which the parallel beam of light is incident. The notion of effective focal length does not appear to be useful for this combination.

b) An object \[\mathbf{1}.\mathbf{5}\text{ }\mathbf{cm}\] in size is placed on the side of the convex lens in the arrangement (a) above. The distance between the object and the convex lens is \[\mathbf{40cm}\]. Determine the magnification produced by the two-lens system, and the size of the image.

Ans: Consider the given diagram of the previous arrangement as follows:

Here, it is said that,

Height of the image, \[{{h}_{1}}=1.5\text{ }cm\]

Object distance from the side of the convex lens, ${{u}_{1}}=-40cm$

$|{{u}_{1}}|=40cm$

Using lens formula, 

$\frac{1}{{{v}_{1}}}-\frac{1}{{{u}_{1}}}=\frac{1}{{{f}_{1}}}$

$\Rightarrow \frac{1}{{{v}_{1}}}=\frac{1}{30}+\frac{1}{-40}=\frac{1}{120}$

$\Rightarrow {{v}_{1}}=120cm$

Magnification, $m=\frac{{{v}_{1}}}{|{{u}_{1}}|}$

$\Rightarrow m=\frac{120}{40}=3$

Hence, the magnification due to the convex lens is \[3\].

The image made by the convex lens acts as an object for the concave lens.

Using lens formula, 

$\frac{1}{{{v}_{2}}}-\frac{1}{{{u}_{2}}}=\frac{1}{{{f}_{2}}}$

Where, object distance $={{u}_{2}}$.

${{u}_{2}}=120-8=112cm$.

Image distance $={{v}_{2}}$.

$\Rightarrow \frac{1}{{{v}_{2}}}=\frac{1}{-20}+\frac{1}{112}=\frac{-92}{2240}$

$\Rightarrow {{v}_{2}}=-\frac{2240}{92}cm$

Magnification, $m'=\frac{|{{v}_{1}}|}{|{{u}_{1}}|}$

$\Rightarrow m'=\frac{2240}{92}\times \frac{1}{112}=\frac{20}{92}$

Hence, the magnification due to the concave lens is $\frac{20}{92}$.

The magnification due to the combination of the two lenses is calculated as:

$m\times m'=3\times \frac{20}{92}=0.652$

Thus,

$\frac{{{h}_{2}}}{{{h}_{1}}}=0.652$

$\Rightarrow {{h}_{2}}=0.652\times 1.5=0.98cm$

Clearly, the height of the image is \[0.98cm\].

22. At what angle should a ray of light be incident on the face of a prism of refracting angle \[\mathbf{60}{}^\circ \] so that it just suffers total internal reflection at the other face? The refractive index of the material of the prism is \[\mathbf{1}.\mathbf{524}\].

Ans: Consider the given figure below:

Angle of prism, $A=60{}^\circ $

\[{{i}_{1}}\] is the incidence angle.

${{r}_{1}}$ is the refracted angle.

${{r}_{2}}$ is the angle of incidence at the face AC.

$e$is the emergent angle, $e=90{}^\circ $.

Using Snell’s law,

$\mu =\frac{\sin e}{\sin {{r}_{2}}}$

$\Rightarrow 1.524=\frac{\sin 90{}^\circ }{\sin {{r}_{2}}}$

$\Rightarrow \sin {{r}_{2}}=0.6562$

$\Rightarrow {{r}_{2}}\approx 41{}^\circ $

For refraction through prism, angle $A={{r}_{1}}+{{r}_{2}}$.

We get,

${{r}_{1}}=A-{{r}_{2}}=60{}^\circ -41{}^\circ $

$\therefore {{r}_{1}}=19{}^\circ $

Using Snell’s law,

$\mu =\frac{\sin {{i}_{1}}}{\sin {{r}_{1}}}$

$\Rightarrow 1.524=\frac{\sin {{i}_{1}}}{\sin 19{}^\circ }$

$\Rightarrow \sin {{i}_{1}}=0.496$

$\Rightarrow {{i}_{1}}=29.75{}^\circ $

Hence, the incidence angle is $29.75{}^\circ $.

23. You are given prisms made of crown glass and flint glass with a wide variety of angles. Suggest a combination of prisms which will

a) deviate a pencil of white light without much dispersion,

Ans: Place the two prisms nearby each other. Make sure that their feet are on the opposite sides of the incident white light, with their planes touching each other. 

When the white light falls on the first prism, it will get dispersed. 

When this dispersed light falls on the second prism, it will recombine, and the white light will emerge from combining the two prisms. Mathematically, the total angular dispersion produced must be equal to zero as follows:

\[\left( {{\mu }_{V}}-{{\mu }_{R}} \right){{A}_{1}}+\left( {{\mu }_{V'}}-{{\mu }_{R'}} \right){{A}_{2}}=0\]

b) disperse (and displace) a pencil of white light without much deviation.

Ans: Take the system of the two prisms. Increase the angle of the flint-glass prism so that the variations due to the combination of the prisms become equal. 

This combination will scatter the pencil of white light without significant deviation. Mathematically, the total deviation provided by the combination is zero.

$\left( \mu -1 \right){{A}_{1}}+\left( \mu '-1 \right){{A}_{2}}=0$

24. For a normal eye, the far point is at infinity and the near point of distinct vision is about \[\mathbf{25cm}\] in front of the eye. The cornea of the eye provides a converging power of about \[\mathbf{40}\] dioptres, and the least converging power of the eye-lens behind the cornea is about \[\mathbf{20}\] dioptres. From this rough data estimate the range of accommodation (i.e., the range of converging power of the eye-lens) of a normal eye.

Ans: Given that,

Least distance of distinct vision, \[d=25\text{ }cm\]

Far point of a normal eye, $d'=\infty $

Converging power of the cornea, ${{P}_{c}}=40D$

Least converging power of the eye-lens, ${{P}_{e}}=20D$

To see the objects at infinity, the eye uses its least converging power. 

Power of the eye-lens, $P={{P}_{c}}+{{P}_{e}}=40+20=60D$

Power of the eye-lens is given as:

$P=\frac{1}{f}$

$\Rightarrow f=\frac{1}{P}$

$\Rightarrow f=\frac{1}{60}m=\frac{5}{3}cm$

Object distance, $u=-d=-25cm$

Image distance, $v=f=\frac{5}{3}cm$

Using lens formula,

$\frac{1}{f'}=\frac{1}{v}-\frac{1}{u}$

$\Rightarrow \frac{1}{f'}=\frac{3}{5}-\frac{1}{-25}=\frac{16}{25}c{{m}^{-1}}$

Power, $P=\frac{1}{f'}\times 100$

$\Rightarrow P=\frac{16}{25}\times 100=64D$

Power of the eye lens $=64-40=24D$

Hence, the range of accommodation of the eye-lens is from \[20\text{ }D\] to \[24\text{ }D.\]

25. Does short-sightedness (myopia) or long-sightedness (hypermetropia) imply necessarily that the eye has partially lost its ability of accommodation? If not, what might cause these defects of vision?

Ans: A myopic or hypermetropic person can also hold the normal ability of accommodation of the eye-lens. 

Myopia happens when the eyeballs get elongated from front to back. Hypermetropia occurs when the eyeballs get shortened.

The ability of the eye lens to accommodate its focal length is called accommodation.

No, short-sightedness (myopia) or long-sightedness (hypermetropia) does not necessarily imply that the eye has partially lost its accommodation ability.

When the eye-lens lose their ability to accommodate, the defect is called presbyopia. 

The accommodation power of the eye usually reduces with aging. For most people, the near point slowly falls away. They find it hard to see nearby objects conveniently and distinctly without improving eyeglasses. This defect is called presbyopia.

26. A myopic person has been using spectacles of power \[\text{ }\mathbf{1}.\mathbf{0}\] dioptre for distant vision. During old age he also needs to use separate reading glass of power \[+\text{ }\mathbf{2}.\mathbf{0}\] dioptres. Explain what may have happened?

Ans: Given that,

The power of the spectacles used by the myopic person, \[P=-1.0\text{ }D\]

Focal length of the spectacles, $f=\frac{1}{P}=-100cm$

Hence, the person’s far point is \[100\text{ }cm\]. He might have a normal near point of \[25\text{ }cm\]. 

When he utilises the spectacles, the objects set at infinity produce virtual images at \[100\text{ }cm.\]

He uses the ability of accommodation of the eye-lens to see the objects placed between \[100cm\] and \[25cm.\]

During old age, the person uses glasses of power, $P'=+2D$

$f=\frac{1}{P}=\frac{1}{2}=50cm$

$u=-25cm$

Using lens formula,

$\frac{1}{f}=\frac{1}{v}-\frac{1}{u}$

$\Rightarrow \frac{1}{50}=\frac{1}{v}-\frac{1}{-25}$

$\Rightarrow v=50cm$

So, his near point has receded to \[50cm.\]

The ability of accommodation is lost in old age. This defect is called presbyopia. As a result, he is unable to see clearly the objects placed between \[25\text{ }cm\]and \[50cm.\]

27. A person looking at a person wearing a shirt with a pattern comprising vertical and horizontal lines is able to see the vertical lines more distinctly than the horizontal ones. What is this defect due to? How is such a defect of vision corrected?

Ans: In the given case, the person can see vertical lines more precisely than horizontal lines. 

This means that the eye's refracting system (cornea and eye-lens) is not working similarly in different planes. This defect is named astigmatism. 

The person's eye has sufficient curvature in the vertical plane. However, the horizontal plane's curvature is insufficient. Hence, sharp vertical lines are made on the retina, but horizontal lines seem blurred. 

This defect can be fixed by using cylindrical lenses.

28. A man with normal near point (\[\mathbf{25}\text{ }\mathbf{cm}\]) reads a book with small print using a magnifying glass: a thin convex lens of focal length \[\mathbf{5}\text{ }\mathbf{cm}.\]

a) What is the closest and the farthest distance at which he should keep the lens from the page so that he can read the book when viewing through the magnifying glass?

Ans: Given that,

Focal length of the magnifying glass, \[f=5\text{ }cm\]

Least distance of distance vision, \[d=25\text{ }cm\]

Closest Object distance \[=u\]

Image distance, $v=-d=-25cm$

Using lens formula,

$\frac{1}{f}=\frac{1}{v}-\frac{1}{u}$

$\Rightarrow \frac{1}{5}=\frac{1}{-25}-\frac{1}{u}$

$\Rightarrow u=\frac{-25}{6}cm=-4.167cm$

Hence, the nearest distance at which the person can read the book is \[4.167\text{ }cm.\]

For the object at the farthest distance $(u')$, the image distance $(v')=\infty $

Using lens formula,

$\frac{1}{f}=\frac{1}{v'}-\frac{1}{u'}$

$\Rightarrow \frac{1}{5}=\frac{1}{\infty }-\frac{1}{u'}$

$\Rightarrow u'=-5cm$

Hence, the farthest distance at which the person can read the book is \[5cm.\]

b) What is the maximum and the minimum angular magnification (magnifying power) possible using the above simple microscope?

Ans: The formula for maximum angular magnification is given by:

${{a}_{\max }}=\frac{d}{|u|}$

$\Rightarrow {{a}_{\max }}=\frac{25}{\frac{25}{6}}=6$

The formula for minimum angular magnification is given by:

${{a}_{\min }}=\frac{d}{|u'|}$

$\Rightarrow {{a}_{\min }}=\frac{25}{5}=5$

Thus, the maximum and the minimum angular magnification (magnifying power) possible using the given simple microscope are $6$ and $5$ respectively.

29. A card sheet divided into squares each of size \[\mathbf{1}\text{ }\mathbf{m}{{\mathbf{m}}^{2}}\] is being viewed at a distance of \[\mathbf{9}\text{ }\mathbf{cm}\] through a magnifying glass (a converging lens of focal length \[\mathbf{9}\text{ }\mathbf{cm}\]) held close to the eye. 

a) What is the magnification produced by the lens? How much is the area of each square in the virtual image?

Ans: Given that,

Area of each square, $A=\mathbf{1}\text{ }\mathbf{m}{{\mathbf{m}}^{2}}$

Object distance, $u=-9cm$

Focal length, $f=10cm$

Using lens formula,

$\frac{1}{f}=\frac{1}{v}-\frac{1}{u}$

$\Rightarrow \frac{1}{10}=\frac{1}{v}-\frac{1}{-9}$

$\Rightarrow v=-90cm$

Magnification, $m=\frac{v}{u}$

$\Rightarrow m=\frac{-90}{-10}=9$

Area of each square in the virtual image \[={{10}^{2}}A\]

\[{{10}^{2}}\times 1=100m{{m}^{2}}=1c{{m}^{2}}\]

b) What is the angular magnification (magnifying power) of the lens?

Ans: Magnifying power of the lens, $m=\frac{d}{|u|}$

$\Rightarrow m=\frac{25}{9}=2.8$

c) Is the magnification in (a) equal to the magnifying power in (b)? Explain.

Ans: The magnification in (a) is not the same as the magnifying power in (b).

The magnification magnitude is $\left| \frac{v}{u} \right|$ and the magnifying power is $\frac{d}{|u|}$.

The two quantities will be same when the image is formed at the close point \[\left( 25cm \right)\].

30. 

a) At what distance should the lens be held from the figure in Exercise 9.29 in order to view the squares distinctly with the maximum possible magnifying power?

Ans: The maximum possible magnification got when the image is made at the near point \[\left( d\text{ }=\text{ }25\text{ }cm \right).\]

Image distance, \[v=-d=-25\text{ }cm\]

Focal length, \[f\text{ }=\text{ }10\text{ }cm\]

Object distance \[=\text{ }u\]

Using lens formula,

$\frac{1}{f}=\frac{1}{v}-\frac{1}{u}$

$\Rightarrow \frac{1}{10}=\frac{1}{-25}-\frac{1}{u}$

$\Rightarrow u=\frac{-50}{7}cm=-7.14cm$

Hence, to view the squares distinctly, the lens should be kept \[7.14cm\] away from them.

b) What is the magnification in this case?

Ans: Magnification, $m=\left| \frac{v}{u} \right|$

$\Rightarrow m=\frac{25}{\frac{50}{7}}=3.5$

c) Is the magnification equal to the magnifying power in this case? Explain.

Ans: Magnifying power, $m'=\frac{d}{u}$

$\Rightarrow m'=\frac{25}{\frac{50}{7}}=3.5=m$

Since the image is made at the near point \[\left( \mathbf{25}\text{ }\mathbf{cm} \right)\], the magnifying power is equal to the magnification magnitude.

31. What should be the distance between the Object in Exercise 9.30 and the magnifying glass if the virtual image of each square in the figure is to have an area of \[\mathbf{6}.\mathbf{25}\text{ }\mathbf{m}{{\mathbf{m}}^{2}}\]. Would you be able to see the squares distinctly with your eyes very close to the magnifier?

Ans: Given that,

Area of the virtual image of each square, \[A=6.25\text{ }m{{m}^{2}}\]

Area of each square, \[{{A}_{o}}=1\text{ }m{{m}^{2}}\]

Hence, the linear magnification is given by:

$m=\sqrt{\frac{A}{{{A}_{o}}}}$

$m=\sqrt{\frac{6.25}{1}}=2.5$

But,

$m=\frac{v}{u}$

$\Rightarrow v=2.5u$

Focal length of the magnifying glass, \[f=10cm\]

Using lens formula,

$\frac{1}{f}=\frac{1}{v}-\frac{1}{u}$

$\Rightarrow \frac{1}{10}=\frac{1}{2.5u}-\frac{1}{u}$

$\Rightarrow u=\frac{-1.5\times 10}{2.5}cm=-6cm$

And,

$v=2.5u$

$\Rightarrow v=2.5\times -6=-15cm$

The virtual image is made at a distance of \[15\text{ }cm\], which is less than the near point of a normal eye. Hence it cannot be visible by the eye distinctly.

32. 

a) The angle subtended at the eye by an object is equal to the angle subtended at the eye by the virtual image produced by a magnifying glass. In what sense then does a magnifying glass provide angular magnification?

Ans: Though the image size is larger than the object, the angular size of the image is equivalent to the angular size of the object. 

A magnifying glass supports one seeing the objects closer than the least distance of distinct vision. A closer object produces a larger angular size. 

A magnifying glass gives angular magnification. Without magnification, the object cannot be located closer to the eye. With magnification, the object can be set much closer to the eye.

b) In viewing through a magnifying glass, one usually positions one's eyes very close to the lens. Does angular magnification change if the eye is moved back?

Ans: Yes, the angular magnification varies. 

When the length between the eye and a magnifying glass rises, the angular magnification reduces slightly because the subtended angle at the eye is imperceptibly less than the lenses. 

Image distance does not have any impact on angular magnification.

c) Magnifying power of a simple microscope is inversely proportional to the focal length of the lens. What then stops us from using a convex lens of smaller and smaller focal length and achieving greater and greater magnifying power?

Ans: The convex lens's focal length cannot be reduced by a more significant amount. 

This is because making lenses having tiny focal lengths is not easy. 

Spherical and chromatic aberrations are created by a convex lens having a petite focal length.

d) Why must both the objective and the eyepiece of a compound microscope have short focal lengths?

Ans: The angular magnification produced by the compound microscope’s eyepiece is:

$\left[ \left( \frac{25}{{{f}_{e}}} \right)+1 \right]$

Where, ${{f}_{e}}$ is the eyepiece's focal length.

It can be seen that if ${{f}_{e}}$ is small, then angular magnification of the eyepiece will be great.

The angular magnification of the compound microscope’s objective lens is given as $\frac{{{f}_{o}}}{{{u}_{o}}}$.

${{u}_{o}}$: Object distance for the objective lens

${{f}_{o}}$: Objective's focal length

The magnification is large when ${{u}_{o}}>{{f}_{o}}$. 

In the case of a microscope, the object is placed close to the objective lens. Hence, the object distance is tiny. 

Since ${{u}_{o}}$ is small, ${{f}_{o}}$ will be smaller. Therefore, ${{f}_{e}}$ and  ${{f}_{o}}$ are both small for the given condition.

e) When viewing through a compound microscope, our eyes should be positioned not on the eyepiece but a short distance away from it for best viewing. Why? How much should be that short distance between the eye and eyepiece?

Ans: We cannot collect much-refracted light when we put our eyes too close to the compound microscope's eyepiece. 

As a result, the field view reduces substantially. Hence, the image's clarity gets blurred. 

The best view of the eye for seeing through a compound microscope is at the eye-ring connected to the eyepiece. The exact location of the eye depends on the separation between the objective lens and the eyepiece.

33. An angular magnification (magnifying power) of \[\mathbf{30X}\] is desired using an objective of focal length \[\mathbf{1}.\mathbf{25}\text{ }\mathbf{cm}\] and an eyepiece of focal length \[\mathbf{5}\text{ }\mathbf{cm}.\] How will you set up the compound microscope?

Ans: Given that,

Focal length of the objective lens, ${{f}_{o}}=1.25cm$

Focal length of the eyepiece, \[{{f}_{e}}=5\text{ }cm\]

Least distance of distinct vision, \[d\text{ }=\text{ }25\text{ }cm\]

Angular magnification of the compound microscope \[=\text{ }30X\]

Total magnifying power of the compound microscope, \[m\text{ = }30\]

The eyepiece’s angular magnification is given by:

${{m}_{e}}=1+\frac{d}{{{f}_{e}}}$

\[\Rightarrow {{m}_{e}}=1+\frac{25}{5}\]

$\Rightarrow {{m}_{e}}=6$

The objective lens angular magnification is given by:

$m={{m}_{o}}{{m}_{e}}$

$\Rightarrow {{m}_{o}}=\frac{m}{{{m}_{e}}}$

\[\Rightarrow {{m}_{o}}=\frac{30}{6}=5\]

We have, 

${{m}_{o}}=\frac{{{v}_{o}}}{-{{u}_{o}}}$

\[\Rightarrow 5=\frac{{{v}_{o}}}{-{{u}_{o}}}\]

\[\Rightarrow {{v}_{o}}=-5{{u}_{o}}\]……(1)

Using lens formula,

$\frac{1}{{{f}_{o}}}=\frac{1}{{{v}_{o}}}-\frac{1}{{{u}_{o}}}$

$\Rightarrow \frac{1}{1.25}=\frac{1}{-5{{u}_{o}}}-\frac{1}{{{u}_{o}}}$

$\Rightarrow {{u}_{o}}=-1.5cm$

And, \[{{v}_{o}}=-5{{u}_{o}}=-5\times -1.5=7.5cm\]

The object should be placed \[1.5cm\] away from the objective lens to get the desired magnification.

Using lens formula,

$\frac{1}{{{f}_{e}}}=\frac{1}{{{v}_{e}}}-\frac{1}{{{u}_{e}}}$

Where, ${{v}_{e}}=-d=-25cm$

$\Rightarrow \frac{1}{5}=\frac{1}{-25}-\frac{1}{{{u}_{e}}}$

$\Rightarrow {{u}_{e}}=-4.17cm$

Separation between the eyepiece and the objective lens $=|{{u}_{e}}|+|{{v}_{o}}|$

$|{{u}_{e}}|+|{{v}_{o}}|=4.17+7.5=11.67cm$

Therefore, the separation between the eyepiece and the objective lens should be \[11.67cm.\]

34. A small telescope has an objective lens of focal length \[\mathbf{140}\text{ }\mathbf{cm}\] and an eyepiece of focal length \[\mathbf{5}.\mathbf{0}\text{ }\mathbf{cm}\]. What is the magnifying power of the telescope for viewing distant objects when

a) the telescope is in normal adjustment (i.e., when the final image is at infinity)?

Ans: Given that,

Focal length of the objective lens, ${{f}_{o}}=140cm$

Focal length of the eyepiece, \[{{f}_{e}}=5\text{ }cm\]

Least distance of distinct vision, \[d\text{ }=\text{ }25\text{ }cm\]

When the telescope is in normal adjustment, formula for magnifying power is given by:

$m=\frac{{{f}_{o}}}{{{f}_{e}}}$

$\Rightarrow m=\frac{140}{5}=28$

b) the final image is formed at the least distance of distinct vision \[\left( \mathbf{25}\text{ }\mathbf{cm} \right)\]?

Ans: When the final image is formed at \[d\], the formula for magnifying power of telescope is given by:

$m=\frac{{{f}_{o}}}{{{f}_{e}}}\left( 1+\frac{{{f}_{e}}}{d} \right)$

$\Rightarrow m=\frac{140}{5}\left( 1+\frac{5}{25} \right)=28[1+0.2]$

\[\Rightarrow m=33.6\]

35. 

a) For the telescope described in Exercise 9.34 (a), what is the separation between the objective lens and the eyepiece?

Ans: Given that,

Focal length of the objective lens, \[{{f}_{o}}=140\text{ }cm\]

Focal length of the eyepiece, \[{{f}_{e}}=5\text{ }cm\]

The separation between the objective lens and the eyepiece in normal adjustment $={{f}_{o}}+{{f}_{e}}=(140+5)\text{ }cm=145cm$

b) If this telescope is used to view a \[\mathbf{100}\text{ }\mathbf{m}\] tall tower \[\mathbf{3}\text{ }\mathbf{km}\] away, what is the height of the image of the tower formed by the objective lens? 

Ans: Given that,

Height of the tower, \[{{h}_{1}}=100\text{ }m\]

Distance of the tower from the telescope, \[u\text{ }=\text{ }3\text{ }km\text{ }=\text{ }3000\text{ }m\]

The angle subtended by the tower at the telescope is given as:

$\theta =\frac{{{h}_{1}}}{u}$

$\Rightarrow \theta =\frac{100}{3000}=\frac{1}{30}rad$

The angle subtended by the image made by the objective lens is given by:

$\theta =\frac{{{h}_{2}}}{{{f}_{o}}}$

$\Rightarrow \frac{1}{30}=\frac{{{h}_{2}}}{140}$

$\therefore {{h}_{2}}=4.7cm$

Therefore, the objective lens forms a \[4.7cm\] tall image of the tower.

c) What is the height of the final image of the tower if it is formed at \[\mathbf{25}\text{ }\mathbf{cm}\]?

Ans: Given that,

Image is formed at a distance, \[d\text{ }=\text{ }25cm\]

The eyepiece’s magnification is given by:

$m=1+\frac{d}{{{f}_{e}}}$

\[\Rightarrow m=1+\frac{25}{5}\]

$\Rightarrow m=6$

Height of the final image, $=m\times {{h}_{2}}=6\times 4.7=28.2cm$ 

Hence, the final image’ height of the tower is \[28.2cm\].

36. A Cassegrain telescope uses two mirrors as shown in figure. Such a telescope is built with the mirrors \[\mathbf{20}\text{ }\mathbf{mm}\] apart. If the radius of curvature of the large mirror is \[\mathbf{220}\text{ }\mathbf{mm}\] and these all mirror is \[\mathbf{140mm}\], where will the final image of an object at infinity be?

(Image will be uploaded soon)

Ans: A Cassegrain telescope contains two mirrors, one is an objective mirror and the second one is the secondary mirror. We need to find the distance of the final image from the secondary mirror. 

Given: distance between the objective mirror and the secondary mirror, \[d=20mm\]

Radius of curvature of the objective mirror, \[{{R}_{1}}=220\text{ }mm\]

Hence, objective mirror’s focal length, ${{f}_{1}}=\frac{{{R}_{1}}}{2}=110mm$

Secondary mirror’s radius of curvature, \[{{R}_{2}}=140\text{ }mm\]

Secondary mirror’s focal length, ${{f}_{2}}=\frac{{{R}_{2}}}{2}=70mm$

The image of an object set at infinity, made by the objective mirror, will serve as a virtual object for the secondary mirror.

Hence, the secondary mirror’s virtual object distance, $u={{f}_{1}}-d$

$\Rightarrow u=110-20=90mm$

Using mirror formula,

$\frac{1}{u}+\frac{1}{v}=\frac{1}{{{f}_{2}}}$

$\Rightarrow \frac{1}{v}=\frac{1}{{{f}_{2}}}-\frac{1}{u}$

Now, we put given values,

$\Rightarrow \frac{1}{v}=\frac{1}{70}-\frac{1}{90}$

$\Rightarrow \frac{1}{v}=\frac{9-7}{630}$

$\Rightarrow \frac{1}{v}=\frac{2}{630}$

$\Rightarrow v=315mm$

Clearly, the final image will be made \[315\text{ }mm\] away from the secondary mirror.

37. Light incident normally on a plane mirror attached to a galvanometer coil retraces backwards as shown in figure. A current in the coil produces a deflection of \[\mathbf{3}.\mathbf{5}{}^\circ \] from the mirror. What is the displacement of the reflected spot of light on a screen placed \[\mathbf{1}.\mathbf{5}\text{ }\mathbf{m}\] away?

Ans: Angle of deflection, $\theta =\mathbf{3}.\mathbf{5}{}^\circ $

Screen distance from the mirror, \[D=1.5\text{ }m\]

The reflected rays will deflect by an amount twice the deflection angle,  $2\theta =7{}^\circ $.

The displacement of the light’s reflected spot on the screen is given as:

$\tan 2\theta =\frac{d}{1.5}$

$\therefore d=1.5\times \tan 7{}^\circ =0.184m=18.4cm$

Hence, the displacement of the reflected spot of light is \[18.4\text{ }cm.\]

38. Figure shows an equiconvex lens (of refractive index \[\mathbf{1}.\mathbf{50}\]) in contact with a liquid layer on top of a plane mirror. A small needle with its tip on the principal axis is moved along the axis until its inverted image is found at the position of the needle. The distance of the needle from the lens is measured to be \[\mathbf{45}.\mathbf{0}\text{ }\mathbf{cm}\]. The liquid is removed and the experiment is repeated. The new distance is measured to be \[\mathbf{30}.\mathbf{0}\text{ }\mathbf{cm}\]. What is the refractive index of the liquid?

Ans: An equiconvex lens is in touch with a liquid layer on a plane mirror top. A small needle placed on the principal axis is moved along the axis until its inverted image will be at the position of the needle.

Convex lens focal length, \[{{f}_{1}}=30\text{ }cm\]

The liquid will behave as a mirror. 

Liquid’s focal length \[=\text{ }f{}_{2}\]

System’s focal length, \[f\text{ }=\text{ }45\text{ }cm\]

The equivalent focal length is given as:

$\frac{1}{f}=\frac{1}{{{f}_{1}}}+\frac{1}{{{f}_{2}}}$

$\Rightarrow \frac{1}{{{f}_{2}}}=\frac{1}{f}-\frac{1}{{{f}_{1}}}$

$\Rightarrow \frac{1}{{{f}_{2}}}=\frac{1}{45}-\frac{1}{30}=-\frac{1}{90}$

$\therefore {{f}_{2}}=-90cm$

Let the lens’s refractive index be ${{\mu }_{1}}$ and curvature radius of one surface be \[R.\]

Hence, the curvature radius of the other surface is \[\text{ }R\].

We use,

$\frac{1}{{{f}_{1}}}=\left( {{\mu }_{1}}-1 \right)\left[ \frac{1}{R}-\frac{1}{-R} \right]$

$\Rightarrow \frac{1}{30}=\left( 1.5-1 \right)\left[ \frac{2}{R} \right]$

$\therefore R=30cm$

Let ${{\mu }_{2}}$ be the liquid’s refractive index.

Liquid’s curvature radius on the side of the plane mirror $=\infty $.

Curvature radius of the liquid on the side of the lens, \[R=-\text{ }30\text{ }cm\].

We use,

$\frac{1}{{{f}_{2}}}=\left( {{\mu }_{2}}-1 \right)\left[ \frac{1}{R}-\frac{1}{\infty } \right]$

$\Rightarrow \frac{-1}{90}=\left( {{\mu }_{2}}-1 \right)\left[ \frac{1}{-30}-0 \right]$

$\Rightarrow \left( {{\mu }_{2}}-1 \right)=\frac{1}{3}$

$\Rightarrow {{\mu }_{2}}=1.33$

Clearly, the liquid’s refractive index is \[1.33.\]

Related Study Materials for Class 12 Physics Chapter 9 Ray Optics and Optical Instruments

• Class 12 Physics Revision Notes for Chapter 9 - Ray Optics and Optical Instruments

• Important Questions for CBSE Class 12 Physics Chapter 9 - Ray Optics and Optical Instruments

• NCERT Exemplar for Class 12 Physics Chapter-9 (Book Solutions)

• CBSE Sample Papers 2024-25 for Class 12 Physics

• Previous Year Question Paper for CBSE Class 12 Physics (2023-2013)

NCERT Class 12 Physics Solutions - Free PDF Download

• Chapter 1 - Electric Charges and Fields

• Chapter 2 - Electrostatic Potential and Capacitance

• Chapter 3 - Current Electricity

• Chapter 4 - Moving Charges and Magnetism

• Chapter 5 - Magnetism And Matter

• Chapter 6 - Electromagnetic Induction

• Chapter 7 - Alternating Current

• Chapter 8 - Electromagnetic Waves

• Chapter 9 - Ray Optics and Optical Instruments

• Chapter 10 - Wave Optics

• Chapter 11 - Dual Nature of Radiation and Matter

• Chapter 12 - Atoms

• Chapter 13 - Nuclei

• Chapter 14 - Semiconductor Electronic: Material, Devices And Simple Circuits

• Chapter 15 - Communication Systems

Ray Optics Class 12 NCERT Solutions PDF

For those getting ready for their 12th-grade board exams, NCERT Solutions for Physics Chapter 9 offers valuable assistance. Crafted by Vedantu's subject experts in line with CBSE guidelines, these solutions foster a robust comprehension of all concepts. Particularly beneficial for those struggling with ray optics, these NCERT solutions provide clarity. Additionally, opting for online classes can enhance the learning experience for a more comprehensive understanding.

Important Concepts of Chapter 9

Chapter 9 - Ray Optics and Optical Instruments cover the following topics:

• Reflection 

• Refraction 

• Scattering 

• Optical instruments. 

Key Points at a Glance

Why Choose Ray Optics Class 12 NCERT Solutions?

Firstly students should not feel discouraged if they are unable to work out the exercise questions by themselves. For students struggling with the NCERT questions of this chapter, Ray Optics Class 12 solutions are a safe bet. On referring to these Ray Optics class 12 NCERT Solutions they will be able to understand and solve the questions on their own.

Ray Optics for Class 12 NCERT solutions are prepared concisely, making it helpful for all students. Some of the features of the Ray Optics class 12 NCERT PDF are as follows.

The below-given picture shows one of the solutions.

• Comprehensive explanations for each exercise and questions, promoting a deeper understanding of the subject.

• Clear and structured presentation for easy comprehension.

• Accurate answers aligned with the curriculum, boosting students' confidence in their knowledge.

• Visual aids like diagrams and illustrations to simplify complex concepts.

• Additional tips and insights to enhance students' performance.

• Chapter summaries for quick revision.

• Online accessibility and downloadable resources for flexible study and revision.

(Image will be uploaded soon)

Ray Optics Class 12 NCERT PDF will be beneficial to all students. By using the solutions PDF students can save time and address their doubts effectively. Hence, all students are recommended to download the solutions to Ray Optics class 12 NCERT.

Conclusion

The NCERT Solutions for Class 12 Chapter 9 - “Ray Optical Instruments”, provided by Vedantu, is a valuable tool for Class 12 students. It helps introduce Science concepts in an accessible manner. The provided solutions and explanations simplify complex ideas, making it easier for Class 12 Students to understand the material. By using Vedantu's resources, Students can develop a deeper understanding of NCERT concepts. These solutions are a helpful aid for Class 12 students, empowering them to excel in their studies and develop a genuine appreciation for Ray Optical Instruments.