
An integer $m$ is said to be related to another integer $n$ if $m$ is a multiple of $n$. Then find the type of relation.
A. Reflexive and symmetric
B. Reflexive and transitive
C. Symmetric and transitive
D. Equivalence relation
Answer
232.8k+ views
Hint: First we will assume a relation $R$ that is defined by an integer $m$ is said to be related to another integer $n$ if $m$ is a multiple of $n$. Then we will check whether it satisfies the reflexive property, symmetric property, and transitive property.
Formula Used:
Equivalent Relation:
If $\left( {x,x} \right) \in R$ then $R$ is reflexive.
If $\left( {x,y} \right) \in R$ and $\left( {y,x} \right) \in R$ then $R$ is symmetric.
If $\left( {x,y} \right) \in R$ and $\left( {y,z} \right) \in R$ implies $\left( {x,z} \right) \in R$, then $R$ is transitive.
Complete step by step solution
Given that, an integer $m$ is said to be related to another integer $n$ if $m$ is a multiple of $n$. This means $n$ divisible by $m$.
We know that a number is divisible by itself.
Let $m$ be a number. Then $m$ is divisible by $m$.
Thus, $\left( {m,m} \right) \in R$. Hence the relation is reflexive.
Let $m$ and $n$ be two numbers and $\left( {m,n} \right) \in R$. Since $\left( {m,n} \right) \in R$, so $m$ is divisible by $n$.
Therefore, $\dfrac{m}{n} = k$ where $k$ is an integer.
$ \Rightarrow \dfrac{n}{m} = \dfrac{1}{k}$, but $\dfrac{1}{k}$ is not an integer.
Thus, $n$ is not divisible by $m$. So, $\left( {n,m} \right) \notin R$.
Hence $R$ is not symmetric.
Let $m$, $n$, and $p$ be two numbers and $\left( {m,n} \right) \in R$ and $\left( {n,p} \right) \in R$.
Since $\left( {m,n} \right) \in R$, so $m$ is divisible by $n$. This implies $\dfrac{m}{n} = {k_1}$ where ${k_1}$ is an integer.
Since $\left( {n,p} \right) \in R$, so $n$ is divisible by $p$. This implies $\dfrac{n}{p} = {k_2}$ where ${k_2}$ is an integer.
Multiply $\dfrac{m}{n} = {k_1}$ and $\dfrac{n}{p} = {k_2}$
$\dfrac{m}{n} \cdot \dfrac{n}{p} = {k_1} \cdot {k_2}$
$ \Rightarrow \dfrac{m}{p} = {k_1}{k_2}$
Since ${k_1}{k_2}$ is an integer. So $m$ is divisible by $p$. This implies $\left( {m,p} \right) \in R$.
Hence $R$ is transitive.
Option ‘C’ is correct
Note: Whenever you get this type of question the key concept of solving is you have first knowledge of all the relations like reflexive, symmetric, and transitive. A relation is equivalent if and only if the relation is reflexive, symmetric, and transitive. Since the relation is not symmetric, the relation never is an equivalence relation.
Formula Used:
Equivalent Relation:
If $\left( {x,x} \right) \in R$ then $R$ is reflexive.
If $\left( {x,y} \right) \in R$ and $\left( {y,x} \right) \in R$ then $R$ is symmetric.
If $\left( {x,y} \right) \in R$ and $\left( {y,z} \right) \in R$ implies $\left( {x,z} \right) \in R$, then $R$ is transitive.
Complete step by step solution
Given that, an integer $m$ is said to be related to another integer $n$ if $m$ is a multiple of $n$. This means $n$ divisible by $m$.
We know that a number is divisible by itself.
Let $m$ be a number. Then $m$ is divisible by $m$.
Thus, $\left( {m,m} \right) \in R$. Hence the relation is reflexive.
Let $m$ and $n$ be two numbers and $\left( {m,n} \right) \in R$. Since $\left( {m,n} \right) \in R$, so $m$ is divisible by $n$.
Therefore, $\dfrac{m}{n} = k$ where $k$ is an integer.
$ \Rightarrow \dfrac{n}{m} = \dfrac{1}{k}$, but $\dfrac{1}{k}$ is not an integer.
Thus, $n$ is not divisible by $m$. So, $\left( {n,m} \right) \notin R$.
Hence $R$ is not symmetric.
Let $m$, $n$, and $p$ be two numbers and $\left( {m,n} \right) \in R$ and $\left( {n,p} \right) \in R$.
Since $\left( {m,n} \right) \in R$, so $m$ is divisible by $n$. This implies $\dfrac{m}{n} = {k_1}$ where ${k_1}$ is an integer.
Since $\left( {n,p} \right) \in R$, so $n$ is divisible by $p$. This implies $\dfrac{n}{p} = {k_2}$ where ${k_2}$ is an integer.
Multiply $\dfrac{m}{n} = {k_1}$ and $\dfrac{n}{p} = {k_2}$
$\dfrac{m}{n} \cdot \dfrac{n}{p} = {k_1} \cdot {k_2}$
$ \Rightarrow \dfrac{m}{p} = {k_1}{k_2}$
Since ${k_1}{k_2}$ is an integer. So $m$ is divisible by $p$. This implies $\left( {m,p} \right) \in R$.
Hence $R$ is transitive.
Option ‘C’ is correct
Note: Whenever you get this type of question the key concept of solving is you have first knowledge of all the relations like reflexive, symmetric, and transitive. A relation is equivalent if and only if the relation is reflexive, symmetric, and transitive. Since the relation is not symmetric, the relation never is an equivalence relation.
Recently Updated Pages
Geometry of Complex Numbers Explained

JEE General Topics in Chemistry Important Concepts and Tips

JEE Extractive Metallurgy Important Concepts and Tips for Exam Preparation

JEE Amino Acids and Peptides Important Concepts and Tips for Exam Preparation

JEE Atomic Structure and Chemical Bonding important Concepts and Tips

Electricity and Magnetism Explained: Key Concepts & Applications

Trending doubts
JEE Main 2026: Session 2 Registration Open, City Intimation Slip, Exam Dates, Syllabus & Eligibility

JEE Main 2026 Application Login: Direct Link, Registration, Form Fill, and Steps

JEE Main Marking Scheme 2026- Paper-Wise Marks Distribution and Negative Marking Details

Understanding the Angle of Deviation in a Prism

Hybridisation in Chemistry – Concept, Types & Applications

How to Convert a Galvanometer into an Ammeter or Voltmeter

Other Pages
JEE Advanced Marks vs Ranks 2025: Understanding Category-wise Qualifying Marks and Previous Year Cut-offs

Understanding the Electric Field of a Uniformly Charged Ring

JEE Advanced Weightage 2025 Chapter-Wise for Physics, Maths and Chemistry

Derivation of Equation of Trajectory Explained for Students

Understanding Electromagnetic Waves and Their Importance

Understanding How a Current Loop Acts as a Magnetic Dipole

