An integer $m$ is said to be related to another integer $n$ if $m$ is a multiple of $n$. Then find the type of relation.
A. Reflexive and symmetric
B. Reflexive and transitive
C. Symmetric and transitive
D. Equivalence relation
Answer
249.9k+ views
Hint: First we will assume a relation $R$ that is defined by an integer $m$ is said to be related to another integer $n$ if $m$ is a multiple of $n$. Then we will check whether it satisfies the reflexive property, symmetric property, and transitive property.
Formula Used:
Equivalent Relation:
If $\left( {x,x} \right) \in R$ then $R$ is reflexive.
If $\left( {x,y} \right) \in R$ and $\left( {y,x} \right) \in R$ then $R$ is symmetric.
If $\left( {x,y} \right) \in R$ and $\left( {y,z} \right) \in R$ implies $\left( {x,z} \right) \in R$, then $R$ is transitive.
Complete step by step solution
Given that, an integer $m$ is said to be related to another integer $n$ if $m$ is a multiple of $n$. This means $n$ divisible by $m$.
We know that a number is divisible by itself.
Let $m$ be a number. Then $m$ is divisible by $m$.
Thus, $\left( {m,m} \right) \in R$. Hence the relation is reflexive.
Let $m$ and $n$ be two numbers and $\left( {m,n} \right) \in R$. Since $\left( {m,n} \right) \in R$, so $m$ is divisible by $n$.
Therefore, $\dfrac{m}{n} = k$ where $k$ is an integer.
$ \Rightarrow \dfrac{n}{m} = \dfrac{1}{k}$, but $\dfrac{1}{k}$ is not an integer.
Thus, $n$ is not divisible by $m$. So, $\left( {n,m} \right) \notin R$.
Hence $R$ is not symmetric.
Let $m$, $n$, and $p$ be two numbers and $\left( {m,n} \right) \in R$ and $\left( {n,p} \right) \in R$.
Since $\left( {m,n} \right) \in R$, so $m$ is divisible by $n$. This implies $\dfrac{m}{n} = {k_1}$ where ${k_1}$ is an integer.
Since $\left( {n,p} \right) \in R$, so $n$ is divisible by $p$. This implies $\dfrac{n}{p} = {k_2}$ where ${k_2}$ is an integer.
Multiply $\dfrac{m}{n} = {k_1}$ and $\dfrac{n}{p} = {k_2}$
$\dfrac{m}{n} \cdot \dfrac{n}{p} = {k_1} \cdot {k_2}$
$ \Rightarrow \dfrac{m}{p} = {k_1}{k_2}$
Since ${k_1}{k_2}$ is an integer. So $m$ is divisible by $p$. This implies $\left( {m,p} \right) \in R$.
Hence $R$ is transitive.
Option ‘C’ is correct
Note: Whenever you get this type of question the key concept of solving is you have first knowledge of all the relations like reflexive, symmetric, and transitive. A relation is equivalent if and only if the relation is reflexive, symmetric, and transitive. Since the relation is not symmetric, the relation never is an equivalence relation.
Formula Used:
Equivalent Relation:
If $\left( {x,x} \right) \in R$ then $R$ is reflexive.
If $\left( {x,y} \right) \in R$ and $\left( {y,x} \right) \in R$ then $R$ is symmetric.
If $\left( {x,y} \right) \in R$ and $\left( {y,z} \right) \in R$ implies $\left( {x,z} \right) \in R$, then $R$ is transitive.
Complete step by step solution
Given that, an integer $m$ is said to be related to another integer $n$ if $m$ is a multiple of $n$. This means $n$ divisible by $m$.
We know that a number is divisible by itself.
Let $m$ be a number. Then $m$ is divisible by $m$.
Thus, $\left( {m,m} \right) \in R$. Hence the relation is reflexive.
Let $m$ and $n$ be two numbers and $\left( {m,n} \right) \in R$. Since $\left( {m,n} \right) \in R$, so $m$ is divisible by $n$.
Therefore, $\dfrac{m}{n} = k$ where $k$ is an integer.
$ \Rightarrow \dfrac{n}{m} = \dfrac{1}{k}$, but $\dfrac{1}{k}$ is not an integer.
Thus, $n$ is not divisible by $m$. So, $\left( {n,m} \right) \notin R$.
Hence $R$ is not symmetric.
Let $m$, $n$, and $p$ be two numbers and $\left( {m,n} \right) \in R$ and $\left( {n,p} \right) \in R$.
Since $\left( {m,n} \right) \in R$, so $m$ is divisible by $n$. This implies $\dfrac{m}{n} = {k_1}$ where ${k_1}$ is an integer.
Since $\left( {n,p} \right) \in R$, so $n$ is divisible by $p$. This implies $\dfrac{n}{p} = {k_2}$ where ${k_2}$ is an integer.
Multiply $\dfrac{m}{n} = {k_1}$ and $\dfrac{n}{p} = {k_2}$
$\dfrac{m}{n} \cdot \dfrac{n}{p} = {k_1} \cdot {k_2}$
$ \Rightarrow \dfrac{m}{p} = {k_1}{k_2}$
Since ${k_1}{k_2}$ is an integer. So $m$ is divisible by $p$. This implies $\left( {m,p} \right) \in R$.
Hence $R$ is transitive.
Option ‘C’ is correct
Note: Whenever you get this type of question the key concept of solving is you have first knowledge of all the relations like reflexive, symmetric, and transitive. A relation is equivalent if and only if the relation is reflexive, symmetric, and transitive. Since the relation is not symmetric, the relation never is an equivalence relation.
Recently Updated Pages
JEE Isolation, Preparation and Properties of Non-metals Important Concepts and Tips for Exam Preparation

Isoelectronic Definition in Chemistry: Meaning, Examples & Trends

Ionisation Energy and Ionisation Potential Explained

Iodoform Reactions - Important Concepts and Tips for JEE

Introduction to Dimensions: Understanding the Basics

Instantaneous Velocity Explained: Formula, Examples & Graphs

Trending doubts
JEE Main 2026: Exam Dates, Session 2 Updates, City Slip, Admit Card & Latest News

Hybridisation in Chemistry – Concept, Types & Applications

JEE Main 2026 Application Login: Direct Link, Registration, Form Fill, and Steps

Understanding the Electric Field of a Uniformly Charged Ring

Derivation of Equation of Trajectory Explained for Students

JEE Main Marking Scheme 2026- Paper-Wise Marks Distribution and Negative Marking Details

Other Pages
JEE Advanced Marks vs Ranks 2025: Understanding Category-wise Qualifying Marks and Previous Year Cut-offs

CBSE Class 12 Maths 2026 Question Paper: Free PDF & Solutions

JEE Advanced 2026 - Exam Date (Released), Syllabus, Registration, Eligibility, Preparation, and More

JEE Advanced Weightage 2025 Chapter-Wise for Physics, Maths and Chemistry

Understanding the Angle of Deviation in a Prism

Understanding Centrifugal Force in Physics

