
An integer $m$ is said to be related to another integer $n$ if $m$ is a multiple of $n$. Then find the type of relation.
A. Reflexive and symmetric
B. Reflexive and transitive
C. Symmetric and transitive
D. Equivalence relation
Answer
164.4k+ views
Hint: First we will assume a relation $R$ that is defined by an integer $m$ is said to be related to another integer $n$ if $m$ is a multiple of $n$. Then we will check whether it satisfies the reflexive property, symmetric property, and transitive property.
Formula Used:
Equivalent Relation:
If $\left( {x,x} \right) \in R$ then $R$ is reflexive.
If $\left( {x,y} \right) \in R$ and $\left( {y,x} \right) \in R$ then $R$ is symmetric.
If $\left( {x,y} \right) \in R$ and $\left( {y,z} \right) \in R$ implies $\left( {x,z} \right) \in R$, then $R$ is transitive.
Complete step by step solution
Given that, an integer $m$ is said to be related to another integer $n$ if $m$ is a multiple of $n$. This means $n$ divisible by $m$.
We know that a number is divisible by itself.
Let $m$ be a number. Then $m$ is divisible by $m$.
Thus, $\left( {m,m} \right) \in R$. Hence the relation is reflexive.
Let $m$ and $n$ be two numbers and $\left( {m,n} \right) \in R$. Since $\left( {m,n} \right) \in R$, so $m$ is divisible by $n$.
Therefore, $\dfrac{m}{n} = k$ where $k$ is an integer.
$ \Rightarrow \dfrac{n}{m} = \dfrac{1}{k}$, but $\dfrac{1}{k}$ is not an integer.
Thus, $n$ is not divisible by $m$. So, $\left( {n,m} \right) \notin R$.
Hence $R$ is not symmetric.
Let $m$, $n$, and $p$ be two numbers and $\left( {m,n} \right) \in R$ and $\left( {n,p} \right) \in R$.
Since $\left( {m,n} \right) \in R$, so $m$ is divisible by $n$. This implies $\dfrac{m}{n} = {k_1}$ where ${k_1}$ is an integer.
Since $\left( {n,p} \right) \in R$, so $n$ is divisible by $p$. This implies $\dfrac{n}{p} = {k_2}$ where ${k_2}$ is an integer.
Multiply $\dfrac{m}{n} = {k_1}$ and $\dfrac{n}{p} = {k_2}$
$\dfrac{m}{n} \cdot \dfrac{n}{p} = {k_1} \cdot {k_2}$
$ \Rightarrow \dfrac{m}{p} = {k_1}{k_2}$
Since ${k_1}{k_2}$ is an integer. So $m$ is divisible by $p$. This implies $\left( {m,p} \right) \in R$.
Hence $R$ is transitive.
Option ‘C’ is correct
Note: Whenever you get this type of question the key concept of solving is you have first knowledge of all the relations like reflexive, symmetric, and transitive. A relation is equivalent if and only if the relation is reflexive, symmetric, and transitive. Since the relation is not symmetric, the relation never is an equivalence relation.
Formula Used:
Equivalent Relation:
If $\left( {x,x} \right) \in R$ then $R$ is reflexive.
If $\left( {x,y} \right) \in R$ and $\left( {y,x} \right) \in R$ then $R$ is symmetric.
If $\left( {x,y} \right) \in R$ and $\left( {y,z} \right) \in R$ implies $\left( {x,z} \right) \in R$, then $R$ is transitive.
Complete step by step solution
Given that, an integer $m$ is said to be related to another integer $n$ if $m$ is a multiple of $n$. This means $n$ divisible by $m$.
We know that a number is divisible by itself.
Let $m$ be a number. Then $m$ is divisible by $m$.
Thus, $\left( {m,m} \right) \in R$. Hence the relation is reflexive.
Let $m$ and $n$ be two numbers and $\left( {m,n} \right) \in R$. Since $\left( {m,n} \right) \in R$, so $m$ is divisible by $n$.
Therefore, $\dfrac{m}{n} = k$ where $k$ is an integer.
$ \Rightarrow \dfrac{n}{m} = \dfrac{1}{k}$, but $\dfrac{1}{k}$ is not an integer.
Thus, $n$ is not divisible by $m$. So, $\left( {n,m} \right) \notin R$.
Hence $R$ is not symmetric.
Let $m$, $n$, and $p$ be two numbers and $\left( {m,n} \right) \in R$ and $\left( {n,p} \right) \in R$.
Since $\left( {m,n} \right) \in R$, so $m$ is divisible by $n$. This implies $\dfrac{m}{n} = {k_1}$ where ${k_1}$ is an integer.
Since $\left( {n,p} \right) \in R$, so $n$ is divisible by $p$. This implies $\dfrac{n}{p} = {k_2}$ where ${k_2}$ is an integer.
Multiply $\dfrac{m}{n} = {k_1}$ and $\dfrac{n}{p} = {k_2}$
$\dfrac{m}{n} \cdot \dfrac{n}{p} = {k_1} \cdot {k_2}$
$ \Rightarrow \dfrac{m}{p} = {k_1}{k_2}$
Since ${k_1}{k_2}$ is an integer. So $m$ is divisible by $p$. This implies $\left( {m,p} \right) \in R$.
Hence $R$ is transitive.
Option ‘C’ is correct
Note: Whenever you get this type of question the key concept of solving is you have first knowledge of all the relations like reflexive, symmetric, and transitive. A relation is equivalent if and only if the relation is reflexive, symmetric, and transitive. Since the relation is not symmetric, the relation never is an equivalence relation.
Recently Updated Pages
Geometry of Complex Numbers – Topics, Reception, Audience and Related Readings

JEE Main 2021 July 25 Shift 1 Question Paper with Answer Key

JEE Main 2021 July 22 Shift 2 Question Paper with Answer Key

JEE Atomic Structure and Chemical Bonding important Concepts and Tips

JEE Amino Acids and Peptides Important Concepts and Tips for Exam Preparation

JEE Electricity and Magnetism Important Concepts and Tips for Exam Preparation

Trending doubts
JEE Main 2025 Session 2: Application Form (Out), Exam Dates (Released), Eligibility, & More

Atomic Structure - Electrons, Protons, Neutrons and Atomic Models

Displacement-Time Graph and Velocity-Time Graph for JEE

JEE Main 2025: Derivation of Equation of Trajectory in Physics

Learn About Angle Of Deviation In Prism: JEE Main Physics 2025

Electric Field Due to Uniformly Charged Ring for JEE Main 2025 - Formula and Derivation

Other Pages
JEE Advanced Marks vs Ranks 2025: Understanding Category-wise Qualifying Marks and Previous Year Cut-offs

JEE Advanced Weightage 2025 Chapter-Wise for Physics, Maths and Chemistry

Instantaneous Velocity - Formula based Examples for JEE

JEE Advanced 2025 Notes

JEE Main Chemistry Question Paper with Answer Keys and Solutions

Degree of Dissociation and Its Formula With Solved Example for JEE
