Answer
Verified
478.2k+ views
Hint: To prove the given problem we have to take the standard equation of vector \[\overrightarrow r \]i.e., \[\overrightarrow r = x\mathop i\limits^ \wedge + y\mathop j\limits^ \wedge + z\mathop k\limits^ \wedge \]. So, use this concept to reach the solution of the given problem.
Complete step-by-step answer:
Given \[\overrightarrow r = \left( {\overrightarrow r .\mathop i\limits^ \wedge } \right)\mathop i\limits^ \wedge + \left( {\overrightarrow r .\mathop j\limits^ \wedge } \right)\mathop j\limits^ \wedge + \left( {\overrightarrow {r.} \mathop k\limits^ \wedge } \right)\mathop k\limits^ \wedge ..................................................\left( 1 \right)\]
Let \[\overrightarrow r = x\mathop i\limits^ \wedge + y\mathop j\limits^ \wedge + z\mathop k\limits^ \wedge ............................................................\left( 2 \right)\]
From equation (1) and (2) we have
\[\overrightarrow r = \left( {\left( {x\mathop i\limits^ \wedge + y\mathop j\limits^ \wedge + z\mathop k\limits^ \wedge } \right).\mathop i\limits^ \wedge } \right)\mathop i\limits^ \wedge + \left( {\left( {x\mathop i\limits^ \wedge + y\mathop j\limits^ \wedge + z\mathop k\limits^ \wedge } \right).\mathop j\limits^ \wedge } \right)\mathop j\limits^ \wedge + \left( {\left( {x\mathop i\limits^ \wedge + y\mathop j\limits^ \wedge + z\mathop k\limits^ \wedge } \right).\mathop k\limits^ \wedge } \right)\mathop k\limits^ \wedge \]
Now first consider \[\overrightarrow r = \left( {\left( {x\mathop i\limits^ \wedge + y\mathop j\limits^ \wedge + z\mathop k\limits^ \wedge } \right).\mathop i\limits^ \wedge } \right)\mathop i\limits^ \wedge \]
\[\overrightarrow r = \left( {x\mathop i\limits^ \wedge .\mathop i\limits^ \wedge + y\mathop j\limits^ \wedge .\mathop i\limits^ \wedge + z\mathop k\limits^ \wedge .\mathop i\limits^ \wedge } \right)\mathop i\limits^ \wedge \]
By using the formulae \[\mathop i\limits^ \wedge .\mathop i\limits^ \wedge = 1{\text{ , }}\mathop j\limits^ \wedge .\mathop i\limits^ \wedge = 0{\text{ and }}\mathop k\limits^ \wedge .\mathop i\limits^ \wedge = 0\] we have
\[\overrightarrow r = \left( {x\left( 1 \right) + y\left( 0 \right) + z\left( 0 \right)} \right)\mathop i\limits^ \wedge = x\mathop i\limits^ \wedge \]
Then consider \[\overrightarrow r = \left( {\left( {x\mathop i\limits^ \wedge + y\mathop j\limits^ \wedge + z\mathop k\limits^ \wedge } \right).\mathop j\limits^ \wedge } \right)\mathop j\limits^ \wedge \]
\[\overrightarrow r = \left( {x\mathop i\limits^ \wedge .\mathop j\limits^ \wedge + y\mathop j\limits^ \wedge .\mathop j\limits^ \wedge + z\mathop k\limits^ \wedge .\mathop j\limits^ \wedge } \right)\mathop j\limits^ \wedge \]
By using the formulae \[\mathop i\limits^ \wedge .\mathop j\limits^ \wedge = 0{\text{ , }}\mathop j\limits^ \wedge .\mathop j\limits^ \wedge = 1{\text{ and }}\mathop k\limits^ \wedge .\mathop j\limits^ \wedge = 0\] we have
\[\overrightarrow r = \left( {x\left( 0 \right) + y\left( 1 \right) + z\left( 0 \right)} \right)\mathop j\limits^ \wedge = y\mathop j\limits^ \wedge \]
Next consider \[\overrightarrow r = \left( {\left( {x\mathop i\limits^ \wedge + y\mathop j\limits^ \wedge + z\mathop k\limits^ \wedge } \right).\mathop k\limits^ \wedge } \right)\mathop k\limits^ \wedge \]
\[\overrightarrow r = \left( {x\mathop i\limits^ \wedge .\mathop k\limits^ \wedge + y\mathop j\limits^ \wedge .\mathop k\limits^ \wedge + z\mathop k\limits^ \wedge .\mathop k\limits^ \wedge } \right)\mathop k\limits^ \wedge \]
By using the formulae \[\mathop i\limits^ \wedge .\mathop k\limits^ \wedge = 0{\text{ , }}\mathop j\limits^ \wedge .\mathop k\limits^ \wedge = 0{\text{ and }}\mathop k\limits^ \wedge .\mathop k\limits^ \wedge = 1\]
\[\overrightarrow r = \left( {x\left( 0 \right) + y\left( 1 \right) + z\left( 1 \right)} \right)\mathop k\limits^ \wedge = z\mathop k\limits^ \wedge \]
Using the above information, we have
\[\overrightarrow r = \left( {\left( {x\mathop i\limits^ \wedge + y\mathop j\limits^ \wedge + z\mathop k\limits^ \wedge } \right).\mathop i\limits^ \wedge } \right)\mathop i\limits^ \wedge + \left( {\left( {x\mathop i\limits^ \wedge + y\mathop j\limits^ \wedge + z\mathop k\limits^ \wedge } \right).\mathop j\limits^ \wedge } \right)\mathop j\limits^ \wedge + \left( {\left( {x\mathop i\limits^ \wedge + y\mathop j\limits^ \wedge + z\mathop k\limits^ \wedge } \right).\mathop k\limits^ \wedge } \right)\mathop k\limits^ \wedge \] equals to
\[\overrightarrow r = x\mathop i\limits^ \wedge + y\mathop j\limits^ \wedge + z\mathop k\limits^ \wedge ...........................................\left( 3 \right)\]
From equations (2) and (3) we can conclude that
\[\overrightarrow r = \left( {\overrightarrow r .\mathop i\limits^ \wedge } \right)\mathop i\limits^ \wedge + \left( {\overrightarrow r .\mathop j\limits^ \wedge } \right)\mathop j\limits^ \wedge + \left( {\overrightarrow {r.} \mathop k\limits^ \wedge } \right)\mathop k\limits^ \wedge \]
Hence proved.
Note: Here we have used dot products of vectors. The formulae which are used in the solution are
\[\mathop i\limits^ \wedge .\mathop i\limits^ \wedge = 1{\text{ , }}\mathop i\limits^ \wedge . \mathop j\limits^ \wedge = 0{\text{ and }}\mathop i\limits^ \wedge .\mathop k\limits^ \wedge = 0 \\
\mathop j\limits^ \wedge .\mathop i\limits^ \wedge = 0{\text{ , }}\mathop j\limits^ \wedge .\mathop j\limits^ \wedge = 1{\text{ and }}\mathop j\limits^ \wedge .\mathop k\limits^ \wedge = 0 \\
\mathop i\limits^ \wedge .\mathop k\limits^ \wedge = 0{\text{ , }}\mathop j\limits^ \wedge .\mathop k\limits^ \wedge = 0{\text{ and }}\mathop k\limits^ \wedge .\mathop k\limits^ \wedge = 1 \\
\]
Complete step-by-step answer:
Given \[\overrightarrow r = \left( {\overrightarrow r .\mathop i\limits^ \wedge } \right)\mathop i\limits^ \wedge + \left( {\overrightarrow r .\mathop j\limits^ \wedge } \right)\mathop j\limits^ \wedge + \left( {\overrightarrow {r.} \mathop k\limits^ \wedge } \right)\mathop k\limits^ \wedge ..................................................\left( 1 \right)\]
Let \[\overrightarrow r = x\mathop i\limits^ \wedge + y\mathop j\limits^ \wedge + z\mathop k\limits^ \wedge ............................................................\left( 2 \right)\]
From equation (1) and (2) we have
\[\overrightarrow r = \left( {\left( {x\mathop i\limits^ \wedge + y\mathop j\limits^ \wedge + z\mathop k\limits^ \wedge } \right).\mathop i\limits^ \wedge } \right)\mathop i\limits^ \wedge + \left( {\left( {x\mathop i\limits^ \wedge + y\mathop j\limits^ \wedge + z\mathop k\limits^ \wedge } \right).\mathop j\limits^ \wedge } \right)\mathop j\limits^ \wedge + \left( {\left( {x\mathop i\limits^ \wedge + y\mathop j\limits^ \wedge + z\mathop k\limits^ \wedge } \right).\mathop k\limits^ \wedge } \right)\mathop k\limits^ \wedge \]
Now first consider \[\overrightarrow r = \left( {\left( {x\mathop i\limits^ \wedge + y\mathop j\limits^ \wedge + z\mathop k\limits^ \wedge } \right).\mathop i\limits^ \wedge } \right)\mathop i\limits^ \wedge \]
\[\overrightarrow r = \left( {x\mathop i\limits^ \wedge .\mathop i\limits^ \wedge + y\mathop j\limits^ \wedge .\mathop i\limits^ \wedge + z\mathop k\limits^ \wedge .\mathop i\limits^ \wedge } \right)\mathop i\limits^ \wedge \]
By using the formulae \[\mathop i\limits^ \wedge .\mathop i\limits^ \wedge = 1{\text{ , }}\mathop j\limits^ \wedge .\mathop i\limits^ \wedge = 0{\text{ and }}\mathop k\limits^ \wedge .\mathop i\limits^ \wedge = 0\] we have
\[\overrightarrow r = \left( {x\left( 1 \right) + y\left( 0 \right) + z\left( 0 \right)} \right)\mathop i\limits^ \wedge = x\mathop i\limits^ \wedge \]
Then consider \[\overrightarrow r = \left( {\left( {x\mathop i\limits^ \wedge + y\mathop j\limits^ \wedge + z\mathop k\limits^ \wedge } \right).\mathop j\limits^ \wedge } \right)\mathop j\limits^ \wedge \]
\[\overrightarrow r = \left( {x\mathop i\limits^ \wedge .\mathop j\limits^ \wedge + y\mathop j\limits^ \wedge .\mathop j\limits^ \wedge + z\mathop k\limits^ \wedge .\mathop j\limits^ \wedge } \right)\mathop j\limits^ \wedge \]
By using the formulae \[\mathop i\limits^ \wedge .\mathop j\limits^ \wedge = 0{\text{ , }}\mathop j\limits^ \wedge .\mathop j\limits^ \wedge = 1{\text{ and }}\mathop k\limits^ \wedge .\mathop j\limits^ \wedge = 0\] we have
\[\overrightarrow r = \left( {x\left( 0 \right) + y\left( 1 \right) + z\left( 0 \right)} \right)\mathop j\limits^ \wedge = y\mathop j\limits^ \wedge \]
Next consider \[\overrightarrow r = \left( {\left( {x\mathop i\limits^ \wedge + y\mathop j\limits^ \wedge + z\mathop k\limits^ \wedge } \right).\mathop k\limits^ \wedge } \right)\mathop k\limits^ \wedge \]
\[\overrightarrow r = \left( {x\mathop i\limits^ \wedge .\mathop k\limits^ \wedge + y\mathop j\limits^ \wedge .\mathop k\limits^ \wedge + z\mathop k\limits^ \wedge .\mathop k\limits^ \wedge } \right)\mathop k\limits^ \wedge \]
By using the formulae \[\mathop i\limits^ \wedge .\mathop k\limits^ \wedge = 0{\text{ , }}\mathop j\limits^ \wedge .\mathop k\limits^ \wedge = 0{\text{ and }}\mathop k\limits^ \wedge .\mathop k\limits^ \wedge = 1\]
\[\overrightarrow r = \left( {x\left( 0 \right) + y\left( 1 \right) + z\left( 1 \right)} \right)\mathop k\limits^ \wedge = z\mathop k\limits^ \wedge \]
Using the above information, we have
\[\overrightarrow r = \left( {\left( {x\mathop i\limits^ \wedge + y\mathop j\limits^ \wedge + z\mathop k\limits^ \wedge } \right).\mathop i\limits^ \wedge } \right)\mathop i\limits^ \wedge + \left( {\left( {x\mathop i\limits^ \wedge + y\mathop j\limits^ \wedge + z\mathop k\limits^ \wedge } \right).\mathop j\limits^ \wedge } \right)\mathop j\limits^ \wedge + \left( {\left( {x\mathop i\limits^ \wedge + y\mathop j\limits^ \wedge + z\mathop k\limits^ \wedge } \right).\mathop k\limits^ \wedge } \right)\mathop k\limits^ \wedge \] equals to
\[\overrightarrow r = x\mathop i\limits^ \wedge + y\mathop j\limits^ \wedge + z\mathop k\limits^ \wedge ...........................................\left( 3 \right)\]
From equations (2) and (3) we can conclude that
\[\overrightarrow r = \left( {\overrightarrow r .\mathop i\limits^ \wedge } \right)\mathop i\limits^ \wedge + \left( {\overrightarrow r .\mathop j\limits^ \wedge } \right)\mathop j\limits^ \wedge + \left( {\overrightarrow {r.} \mathop k\limits^ \wedge } \right)\mathop k\limits^ \wedge \]
Hence proved.
Note: Here we have used dot products of vectors. The formulae which are used in the solution are
\[\mathop i\limits^ \wedge .\mathop i\limits^ \wedge = 1{\text{ , }}\mathop i\limits^ \wedge . \mathop j\limits^ \wedge = 0{\text{ and }}\mathop i\limits^ \wedge .\mathop k\limits^ \wedge = 0 \\
\mathop j\limits^ \wedge .\mathop i\limits^ \wedge = 0{\text{ , }}\mathop j\limits^ \wedge .\mathop j\limits^ \wedge = 1{\text{ and }}\mathop j\limits^ \wedge .\mathop k\limits^ \wedge = 0 \\
\mathop i\limits^ \wedge .\mathop k\limits^ \wedge = 0{\text{ , }}\mathop j\limits^ \wedge .\mathop k\limits^ \wedge = 0{\text{ and }}\mathop k\limits^ \wedge .\mathop k\limits^ \wedge = 1 \\
\]
Recently Updated Pages
How many sigma and pi bonds are present in HCequiv class 11 chemistry CBSE
Mark and label the given geoinformation on the outline class 11 social science CBSE
When people say No pun intended what does that mea class 8 english CBSE
Name the states which share their boundary with Indias class 9 social science CBSE
Give an account of the Northern Plains of India class 9 social science CBSE
Change the following sentences into negative and interrogative class 10 english CBSE
Trending doubts
Fill the blanks with the suitable prepositions 1 The class 9 english CBSE
The Equation xxx + 2 is Satisfied when x is Equal to Class 10 Maths
In Indian rupees 1 trillion is equal to how many c class 8 maths CBSE
Which are the Top 10 Largest Countries of the World?
How do you graph the function fx 4x class 9 maths CBSE
Give 10 examples for herbs , shrubs , climbers , creepers
Difference Between Plant Cell and Animal Cell
Difference between Prokaryotic cell and Eukaryotic class 11 biology CBSE
Why is there a time difference of about 5 hours between class 10 social science CBSE