Answer
Verified
424.2k+ views
Hint: To prove the given problem we have to take the standard equation of vector \[\overrightarrow r \]i.e., \[\overrightarrow r = x\mathop i\limits^ \wedge + y\mathop j\limits^ \wedge + z\mathop k\limits^ \wedge \]. So, use this concept to reach the solution of the given problem.
Complete step-by-step answer:
Given \[\overrightarrow r = \left( {\overrightarrow r .\mathop i\limits^ \wedge } \right)\mathop i\limits^ \wedge + \left( {\overrightarrow r .\mathop j\limits^ \wedge } \right)\mathop j\limits^ \wedge + \left( {\overrightarrow {r.} \mathop k\limits^ \wedge } \right)\mathop k\limits^ \wedge ..................................................\left( 1 \right)\]
Let \[\overrightarrow r = x\mathop i\limits^ \wedge + y\mathop j\limits^ \wedge + z\mathop k\limits^ \wedge ............................................................\left( 2 \right)\]
From equation (1) and (2) we have
\[\overrightarrow r = \left( {\left( {x\mathop i\limits^ \wedge + y\mathop j\limits^ \wedge + z\mathop k\limits^ \wedge } \right).\mathop i\limits^ \wedge } \right)\mathop i\limits^ \wedge + \left( {\left( {x\mathop i\limits^ \wedge + y\mathop j\limits^ \wedge + z\mathop k\limits^ \wedge } \right).\mathop j\limits^ \wedge } \right)\mathop j\limits^ \wedge + \left( {\left( {x\mathop i\limits^ \wedge + y\mathop j\limits^ \wedge + z\mathop k\limits^ \wedge } \right).\mathop k\limits^ \wedge } \right)\mathop k\limits^ \wedge \]
Now first consider \[\overrightarrow r = \left( {\left( {x\mathop i\limits^ \wedge + y\mathop j\limits^ \wedge + z\mathop k\limits^ \wedge } \right).\mathop i\limits^ \wedge } \right)\mathop i\limits^ \wedge \]
\[\overrightarrow r = \left( {x\mathop i\limits^ \wedge .\mathop i\limits^ \wedge + y\mathop j\limits^ \wedge .\mathop i\limits^ \wedge + z\mathop k\limits^ \wedge .\mathop i\limits^ \wedge } \right)\mathop i\limits^ \wedge \]
By using the formulae \[\mathop i\limits^ \wedge .\mathop i\limits^ \wedge = 1{\text{ , }}\mathop j\limits^ \wedge .\mathop i\limits^ \wedge = 0{\text{ and }}\mathop k\limits^ \wedge .\mathop i\limits^ \wedge = 0\] we have
\[\overrightarrow r = \left( {x\left( 1 \right) + y\left( 0 \right) + z\left( 0 \right)} \right)\mathop i\limits^ \wedge = x\mathop i\limits^ \wedge \]
Then consider \[\overrightarrow r = \left( {\left( {x\mathop i\limits^ \wedge + y\mathop j\limits^ \wedge + z\mathop k\limits^ \wedge } \right).\mathop j\limits^ \wedge } \right)\mathop j\limits^ \wedge \]
\[\overrightarrow r = \left( {x\mathop i\limits^ \wedge .\mathop j\limits^ \wedge + y\mathop j\limits^ \wedge .\mathop j\limits^ \wedge + z\mathop k\limits^ \wedge .\mathop j\limits^ \wedge } \right)\mathop j\limits^ \wedge \]
By using the formulae \[\mathop i\limits^ \wedge .\mathop j\limits^ \wedge = 0{\text{ , }}\mathop j\limits^ \wedge .\mathop j\limits^ \wedge = 1{\text{ and }}\mathop k\limits^ \wedge .\mathop j\limits^ \wedge = 0\] we have
\[\overrightarrow r = \left( {x\left( 0 \right) + y\left( 1 \right) + z\left( 0 \right)} \right)\mathop j\limits^ \wedge = y\mathop j\limits^ \wedge \]
Next consider \[\overrightarrow r = \left( {\left( {x\mathop i\limits^ \wedge + y\mathop j\limits^ \wedge + z\mathop k\limits^ \wedge } \right).\mathop k\limits^ \wedge } \right)\mathop k\limits^ \wedge \]
\[\overrightarrow r = \left( {x\mathop i\limits^ \wedge .\mathop k\limits^ \wedge + y\mathop j\limits^ \wedge .\mathop k\limits^ \wedge + z\mathop k\limits^ \wedge .\mathop k\limits^ \wedge } \right)\mathop k\limits^ \wedge \]
By using the formulae \[\mathop i\limits^ \wedge .\mathop k\limits^ \wedge = 0{\text{ , }}\mathop j\limits^ \wedge .\mathop k\limits^ \wedge = 0{\text{ and }}\mathop k\limits^ \wedge .\mathop k\limits^ \wedge = 1\]
\[\overrightarrow r = \left( {x\left( 0 \right) + y\left( 1 \right) + z\left( 1 \right)} \right)\mathop k\limits^ \wedge = z\mathop k\limits^ \wedge \]
Using the above information, we have
\[\overrightarrow r = \left( {\left( {x\mathop i\limits^ \wedge + y\mathop j\limits^ \wedge + z\mathop k\limits^ \wedge } \right).\mathop i\limits^ \wedge } \right)\mathop i\limits^ \wedge + \left( {\left( {x\mathop i\limits^ \wedge + y\mathop j\limits^ \wedge + z\mathop k\limits^ \wedge } \right).\mathop j\limits^ \wedge } \right)\mathop j\limits^ \wedge + \left( {\left( {x\mathop i\limits^ \wedge + y\mathop j\limits^ \wedge + z\mathop k\limits^ \wedge } \right).\mathop k\limits^ \wedge } \right)\mathop k\limits^ \wedge \] equals to
\[\overrightarrow r = x\mathop i\limits^ \wedge + y\mathop j\limits^ \wedge + z\mathop k\limits^ \wedge ...........................................\left( 3 \right)\]
From equations (2) and (3) we can conclude that
\[\overrightarrow r = \left( {\overrightarrow r .\mathop i\limits^ \wedge } \right)\mathop i\limits^ \wedge + \left( {\overrightarrow r .\mathop j\limits^ \wedge } \right)\mathop j\limits^ \wedge + \left( {\overrightarrow {r.} \mathop k\limits^ \wedge } \right)\mathop k\limits^ \wedge \]
Hence proved.
Note: Here we have used dot products of vectors. The formulae which are used in the solution are
\[\mathop i\limits^ \wedge .\mathop i\limits^ \wedge = 1{\text{ , }}\mathop i\limits^ \wedge . \mathop j\limits^ \wedge = 0{\text{ and }}\mathop i\limits^ \wedge .\mathop k\limits^ \wedge = 0 \\
\mathop j\limits^ \wedge .\mathop i\limits^ \wedge = 0{\text{ , }}\mathop j\limits^ \wedge .\mathop j\limits^ \wedge = 1{\text{ and }}\mathop j\limits^ \wedge .\mathop k\limits^ \wedge = 0 \\
\mathop i\limits^ \wedge .\mathop k\limits^ \wedge = 0{\text{ , }}\mathop j\limits^ \wedge .\mathop k\limits^ \wedge = 0{\text{ and }}\mathop k\limits^ \wedge .\mathop k\limits^ \wedge = 1 \\
\]
Complete step-by-step answer:
Given \[\overrightarrow r = \left( {\overrightarrow r .\mathop i\limits^ \wedge } \right)\mathop i\limits^ \wedge + \left( {\overrightarrow r .\mathop j\limits^ \wedge } \right)\mathop j\limits^ \wedge + \left( {\overrightarrow {r.} \mathop k\limits^ \wedge } \right)\mathop k\limits^ \wedge ..................................................\left( 1 \right)\]
Let \[\overrightarrow r = x\mathop i\limits^ \wedge + y\mathop j\limits^ \wedge + z\mathop k\limits^ \wedge ............................................................\left( 2 \right)\]
From equation (1) and (2) we have
\[\overrightarrow r = \left( {\left( {x\mathop i\limits^ \wedge + y\mathop j\limits^ \wedge + z\mathop k\limits^ \wedge } \right).\mathop i\limits^ \wedge } \right)\mathop i\limits^ \wedge + \left( {\left( {x\mathop i\limits^ \wedge + y\mathop j\limits^ \wedge + z\mathop k\limits^ \wedge } \right).\mathop j\limits^ \wedge } \right)\mathop j\limits^ \wedge + \left( {\left( {x\mathop i\limits^ \wedge + y\mathop j\limits^ \wedge + z\mathop k\limits^ \wedge } \right).\mathop k\limits^ \wedge } \right)\mathop k\limits^ \wedge \]
Now first consider \[\overrightarrow r = \left( {\left( {x\mathop i\limits^ \wedge + y\mathop j\limits^ \wedge + z\mathop k\limits^ \wedge } \right).\mathop i\limits^ \wedge } \right)\mathop i\limits^ \wedge \]
\[\overrightarrow r = \left( {x\mathop i\limits^ \wedge .\mathop i\limits^ \wedge + y\mathop j\limits^ \wedge .\mathop i\limits^ \wedge + z\mathop k\limits^ \wedge .\mathop i\limits^ \wedge } \right)\mathop i\limits^ \wedge \]
By using the formulae \[\mathop i\limits^ \wedge .\mathop i\limits^ \wedge = 1{\text{ , }}\mathop j\limits^ \wedge .\mathop i\limits^ \wedge = 0{\text{ and }}\mathop k\limits^ \wedge .\mathop i\limits^ \wedge = 0\] we have
\[\overrightarrow r = \left( {x\left( 1 \right) + y\left( 0 \right) + z\left( 0 \right)} \right)\mathop i\limits^ \wedge = x\mathop i\limits^ \wedge \]
Then consider \[\overrightarrow r = \left( {\left( {x\mathop i\limits^ \wedge + y\mathop j\limits^ \wedge + z\mathop k\limits^ \wedge } \right).\mathop j\limits^ \wedge } \right)\mathop j\limits^ \wedge \]
\[\overrightarrow r = \left( {x\mathop i\limits^ \wedge .\mathop j\limits^ \wedge + y\mathop j\limits^ \wedge .\mathop j\limits^ \wedge + z\mathop k\limits^ \wedge .\mathop j\limits^ \wedge } \right)\mathop j\limits^ \wedge \]
By using the formulae \[\mathop i\limits^ \wedge .\mathop j\limits^ \wedge = 0{\text{ , }}\mathop j\limits^ \wedge .\mathop j\limits^ \wedge = 1{\text{ and }}\mathop k\limits^ \wedge .\mathop j\limits^ \wedge = 0\] we have
\[\overrightarrow r = \left( {x\left( 0 \right) + y\left( 1 \right) + z\left( 0 \right)} \right)\mathop j\limits^ \wedge = y\mathop j\limits^ \wedge \]
Next consider \[\overrightarrow r = \left( {\left( {x\mathop i\limits^ \wedge + y\mathop j\limits^ \wedge + z\mathop k\limits^ \wedge } \right).\mathop k\limits^ \wedge } \right)\mathop k\limits^ \wedge \]
\[\overrightarrow r = \left( {x\mathop i\limits^ \wedge .\mathop k\limits^ \wedge + y\mathop j\limits^ \wedge .\mathop k\limits^ \wedge + z\mathop k\limits^ \wedge .\mathop k\limits^ \wedge } \right)\mathop k\limits^ \wedge \]
By using the formulae \[\mathop i\limits^ \wedge .\mathop k\limits^ \wedge = 0{\text{ , }}\mathop j\limits^ \wedge .\mathop k\limits^ \wedge = 0{\text{ and }}\mathop k\limits^ \wedge .\mathop k\limits^ \wedge = 1\]
\[\overrightarrow r = \left( {x\left( 0 \right) + y\left( 1 \right) + z\left( 1 \right)} \right)\mathop k\limits^ \wedge = z\mathop k\limits^ \wedge \]
Using the above information, we have
\[\overrightarrow r = \left( {\left( {x\mathop i\limits^ \wedge + y\mathop j\limits^ \wedge + z\mathop k\limits^ \wedge } \right).\mathop i\limits^ \wedge } \right)\mathop i\limits^ \wedge + \left( {\left( {x\mathop i\limits^ \wedge + y\mathop j\limits^ \wedge + z\mathop k\limits^ \wedge } \right).\mathop j\limits^ \wedge } \right)\mathop j\limits^ \wedge + \left( {\left( {x\mathop i\limits^ \wedge + y\mathop j\limits^ \wedge + z\mathop k\limits^ \wedge } \right).\mathop k\limits^ \wedge } \right)\mathop k\limits^ \wedge \] equals to
\[\overrightarrow r = x\mathop i\limits^ \wedge + y\mathop j\limits^ \wedge + z\mathop k\limits^ \wedge ...........................................\left( 3 \right)\]
From equations (2) and (3) we can conclude that
\[\overrightarrow r = \left( {\overrightarrow r .\mathop i\limits^ \wedge } \right)\mathop i\limits^ \wedge + \left( {\overrightarrow r .\mathop j\limits^ \wedge } \right)\mathop j\limits^ \wedge + \left( {\overrightarrow {r.} \mathop k\limits^ \wedge } \right)\mathop k\limits^ \wedge \]
Hence proved.
Note: Here we have used dot products of vectors. The formulae which are used in the solution are
\[\mathop i\limits^ \wedge .\mathop i\limits^ \wedge = 1{\text{ , }}\mathop i\limits^ \wedge . \mathop j\limits^ \wedge = 0{\text{ and }}\mathop i\limits^ \wedge .\mathop k\limits^ \wedge = 0 \\
\mathop j\limits^ \wedge .\mathop i\limits^ \wedge = 0{\text{ , }}\mathop j\limits^ \wedge .\mathop j\limits^ \wedge = 1{\text{ and }}\mathop j\limits^ \wedge .\mathop k\limits^ \wedge = 0 \\
\mathop i\limits^ \wedge .\mathop k\limits^ \wedge = 0{\text{ , }}\mathop j\limits^ \wedge .\mathop k\limits^ \wedge = 0{\text{ and }}\mathop k\limits^ \wedge .\mathop k\limits^ \wedge = 1 \\
\]
Recently Updated Pages
Basicity of sulphurous acid and sulphuric acid are
Assertion The resistivity of a semiconductor increases class 13 physics CBSE
The Equation xxx + 2 is Satisfied when x is Equal to Class 10 Maths
What is the stopping potential when the metal with class 12 physics JEE_Main
The momentum of a photon is 2 times 10 16gm cmsec Its class 12 physics JEE_Main
Using the following information to help you answer class 12 chemistry CBSE
Trending doubts
Difference between Prokaryotic cell and Eukaryotic class 11 biology CBSE
Difference Between Plant Cell and Animal Cell
Fill the blanks with the suitable prepositions 1 The class 9 english CBSE
Change the following sentences into negative and interrogative class 10 english CBSE
Give 10 examples for herbs , shrubs , climbers , creepers
What organs are located on the left side of your body class 11 biology CBSE
Write an application to the principal requesting five class 10 english CBSE
What is the type of food and mode of feeding of the class 11 biology CBSE
Name 10 Living and Non living things class 9 biology CBSE