
The electric dipole of moment \[\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}
{\overrightarrow p }& = &{( - \widehat i - 3\widehat j + 2\widehat k) \times {{10}^{ - 29}}Cm}
\end{array}\]is at the origin (0,0,0). The electric field due to this dipole at \[\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}
{\overrightarrow r }& = &{(\widehat i + 3\widehat j + 5\widehat k)}
\end{array}\]is parallel to [Note that \[\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}
{\overrightarrow {r.} \overrightarrow p }& = &0
\end{array}\]]
A) \[\widehat i - 3\widehat j - 2\widehat k\]
B) \[ - \widehat i - 3\widehat j + 2\widehat k\]
C ) \[\widehat i + 3\widehat j - 2\widehat k\]
D) \[ - \widehat i + 3\widehat j - 2\widehat k\]
Answer
216k+ views
Hint: In this question, we have given a condition:
(\[\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}
{\overrightarrow {r.} \overrightarrow p }& = &0
\end{array}\]),
Therefore, According to the given condition we will get to know that the \[\overrightarrow p \]and position vector \[\overrightarrow r \]will be perpendicular to each other. Due to the opposite direction of the electric field to the electric dipole moment, the electric field vector will be the same as the electric dipole moment but in a negative sign. Hence, we will get a suitable answer.
Complete answer:
Basically, the direction of the electric dipole moment is from negative charge to positive charge while the direction of the electric field is from positive charge to negative charge. In other words, we can say that the direction of the electric field is opposite to the electric dipole moment. Hence, as per the given note \[\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}
{\overrightarrow {r.} \overrightarrow p }& = &0
\end{array}\], we can conclude that the electric dipole moment and electric field will be perpendicular to each other but will be in opposite directions.
Electric dipole moment vector and position vector are given,
\[\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}
{ \Rightarrow \overrightarrow p }& = &{( - \widehat i - 3\widehat j + 2\widehat k) \times {{10}^{ - 29}}Cm}
\end{array}\] and position vector \[\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}
{\overrightarrow r }& = &{(\widehat i + 3\widehat j + 5\widehat k)}
\end{array}\]
Therefore, As per given the condition, we can write that
\[\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}
{ \Rightarrow \overrightarrow {r.} \overrightarrow p }& = &0
\end{array}\]
The \[\overrightarrow p \]and \[\overrightarrow r \]are perpendicular to each other. It means that the electric field will also be perpendicular to the position vector \[\overrightarrow r \].
\[\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}
{ \Rightarrow (\widehat i + 3\widehat j + 5\widehat k).( - \widehat i - 3\widehat j + 2\widehat k)}& = &0
\end{array}\]
Now, we know that the electric field is directly proportional to the electric dipole moment, but will be in the opposite direction. There will be a constant. Whose value will be greater than 0.
\[\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}
{ \Rightarrow \overrightarrow E }& = &{ - \lambda \overrightarrow p }
\end{array}\]
Here, a negative sign indicates that the electric field is in the opposite direction to the electric dipole moment. Therefore,
\[\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}
{ \Rightarrow \overrightarrow E }& = &{ - \lambda ( - \widehat i - 3\widehat j + 2\widehat k) \times {{10}^{ - 29}}}
\end{array}\]
\[\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}
{ \Rightarrow \overrightarrow E }& = &{\lambda (\widehat i + 3\widehat j - 2\widehat k) \times {{10}^{ - 29}}}
\end{array}\]
Therefore,\[\overrightarrow E \]will be parallel to the \[(\widehat i + 3\widehat j - 2\widehat k)\]
Now, the final answer is \[(\widehat i + 3\widehat j - 2\widehat k)\]. So, the correct option is C.
Note: In this question, the first point is to keep in mind that the \[\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}
\lambda & > &0
\end{array}\], Where, \[\lambda \]is constant which is the replacement of the proportionality sign.
(\[\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}
{\overrightarrow {r.} \overrightarrow p }& = &0
\end{array}\]),
Therefore, According to the given condition we will get to know that the \[\overrightarrow p \]and position vector \[\overrightarrow r \]will be perpendicular to each other. Due to the opposite direction of the electric field to the electric dipole moment, the electric field vector will be the same as the electric dipole moment but in a negative sign. Hence, we will get a suitable answer.
Complete answer:
Basically, the direction of the electric dipole moment is from negative charge to positive charge while the direction of the electric field is from positive charge to negative charge. In other words, we can say that the direction of the electric field is opposite to the electric dipole moment. Hence, as per the given note \[\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}
{\overrightarrow {r.} \overrightarrow p }& = &0
\end{array}\], we can conclude that the electric dipole moment and electric field will be perpendicular to each other but will be in opposite directions.
Electric dipole moment vector and position vector are given,
\[\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}
{ \Rightarrow \overrightarrow p }& = &{( - \widehat i - 3\widehat j + 2\widehat k) \times {{10}^{ - 29}}Cm}
\end{array}\] and position vector \[\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}
{\overrightarrow r }& = &{(\widehat i + 3\widehat j + 5\widehat k)}
\end{array}\]
Therefore, As per given the condition, we can write that
\[\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}
{ \Rightarrow \overrightarrow {r.} \overrightarrow p }& = &0
\end{array}\]
The \[\overrightarrow p \]and \[\overrightarrow r \]are perpendicular to each other. It means that the electric field will also be perpendicular to the position vector \[\overrightarrow r \].
\[\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}
{ \Rightarrow (\widehat i + 3\widehat j + 5\widehat k).( - \widehat i - 3\widehat j + 2\widehat k)}& = &0
\end{array}\]
Now, we know that the electric field is directly proportional to the electric dipole moment, but will be in the opposite direction. There will be a constant. Whose value will be greater than 0.
\[\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}
{ \Rightarrow \overrightarrow E }& = &{ - \lambda \overrightarrow p }
\end{array}\]
Here, a negative sign indicates that the electric field is in the opposite direction to the electric dipole moment. Therefore,
\[\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}
{ \Rightarrow \overrightarrow E }& = &{ - \lambda ( - \widehat i - 3\widehat j + 2\widehat k) \times {{10}^{ - 29}}}
\end{array}\]
\[\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}
{ \Rightarrow \overrightarrow E }& = &{\lambda (\widehat i + 3\widehat j - 2\widehat k) \times {{10}^{ - 29}}}
\end{array}\]
Therefore,\[\overrightarrow E \]will be parallel to the \[(\widehat i + 3\widehat j - 2\widehat k)\]
Now, the final answer is \[(\widehat i + 3\widehat j - 2\widehat k)\]. So, the correct option is C.
Note: In this question, the first point is to keep in mind that the \[\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}
\lambda & > &0
\end{array}\], Where, \[\lambda \]is constant which is the replacement of the proportionality sign.
Recently Updated Pages
Wheatstone Bridge Explained: Working, Formula & Uses

Young’s Double Slit Experiment Derivation Explained

JEE Atomic Structure and Chemical Bonding important Concepts and Tips

JEE Amino Acids and Peptides Important Concepts and Tips for Exam Preparation

Electricity and Magnetism Explained: Key Concepts & Applications

Chemical Properties of Hydrogen - Important Concepts for JEE Exam Preparation

Trending doubts
JEE Main 2026: Application Form Open, Exam Dates, Syllabus, Eligibility & Question Papers

Derivation of Equation of Trajectory Explained for Students

Hybridisation in Chemistry – Concept, Types & Applications

Understanding the Angle of Deviation in a Prism

Understanding Collisions: Types and Examples for Students

How to Convert a Galvanometer into an Ammeter or Voltmeter

Other Pages
JEE Advanced Marks vs Ranks 2025: Understanding Category-wise Qualifying Marks and Previous Year Cut-offs

Ideal and Non-Ideal Solutions Explained for Class 12 Chemistry

Degree of Dissociation: Meaning, Formula, Calculation & Uses

Understanding Electromagnetic Waves and Their Importance

Understanding the Electric Field of a Uniformly Charged Ring

Understanding Average and RMS Value in Electrical Circuits

