
Let \[S\] be the set of real numbers. A relation \[R = \left\{ {\left( {a,b} \right):1 + ab > 0} \right\}\] on \[S\]. Then which of the following option is correct for the relation.
A. Reflexive and symmetric but not transitive
B. Reflexive and transitive but not symmetric
C. Symmetric, transitive but not reflexive
D. Reflexive, transitive and symmetric
E. None of the above is true
Answer
164.1k+ views
Hint:To check reflexive property, we will check whether \[\left( {a,a} \right) \in R\]. To check the symmetric property, we will check whether \[\left( {a,b} \right) \in R\] implies \[\left( {b,a} \right) \in R\]. To check the transitive property, we will check whether \[\left( {a,b} \right) \in R\], \[\left( {b,c} \right) \in R\] implies \[\left( {a,c} \right) \in R\].
Formula Used:
If a relation reflexive then \[\left( {a,a} \right) \in R\].
If a relation symmetric, then \[\left( {a,b} \right) \in R\] implies \[\left( {b,a} \right) \in R\].
If a relation transitive, then \[\left( {a,b} \right) \in R\], \[\left( {b,c} \right) \in R\] implies \[\left( {a,c} \right) \in R\].
Complete step by step solution:
Given relation is \[R = \left\{ {\left( {a,b} \right):1 + ab > 0} \right\}\].
We know that the square of a real number is always greater than 0.
Let \[a\] be a real number.
So \[{a^2} > 0\]
Add 1 both sides of the inequality.
\[1 + {a^2} > 1 + 0\]
\[ \Rightarrow 1 + a \cdot a > 1\]
\[ \Rightarrow 1 + a \cdot a > 0\]
So, \[\left( {a,a} \right) \in R\]. Thus \[R\] is reflexive.
Let \[a\] and \[b\] be any two real numbers such that \[\left( {a,b} \right) \in R\].
Since \[\left( {a,b} \right) \in R\], so \[1 + ab > 0\].
We can rewrite the inequality as \[1 + ba > 0\], since multiplication follows commutative property.
The inequality \[1 + ba > 0\] implies \[\left( {b,a} \right) \in R\].
Thus \[R\] is symmetric.
Let \[a\], \[b\], and \[c\] be any three real numbers such that \[\left( {a,b} \right) \in R\] and \[\left( {b,c} \right) \in R\].
Let \[a = - 12\], \[b = - 3\], and \[c = \frac{1}{6}\]
\[1 + ab = 1 + \left( { - 12} \right)\left( { - 3} \right) = 37 > 0\]
\[1 + bc = 1 + \left( { - 3} \right)\left( {\frac{1}{6}} \right) = 0.5 > 0\]
\[1 + ac = 1 + \left( { - 12} \right)\left( {\frac{1}{6}} \right) = - 2\ngtr{ 0}\]
Here \[1 + ac\ngtr{ 0 }\], so \[\left( {a,c} \right) \notin R\].
Hence \[R\] is not transitive.
Hence option A is the correct option.
Note:Student often use the inequalities \[1 + ab > 0\], \[1 + bc > 0\] to reach the inequality \[1 + ac > 0\]. But in this process, it impossible to reach the result. The easiest way to check transitive property is by letting the value of \[a\], \[b\] and \[c\]and then put the value of it’s in the inequality.
Formula Used:
If a relation reflexive then \[\left( {a,a} \right) \in R\].
If a relation symmetric, then \[\left( {a,b} \right) \in R\] implies \[\left( {b,a} \right) \in R\].
If a relation transitive, then \[\left( {a,b} \right) \in R\], \[\left( {b,c} \right) \in R\] implies \[\left( {a,c} \right) \in R\].
Complete step by step solution:
Given relation is \[R = \left\{ {\left( {a,b} \right):1 + ab > 0} \right\}\].
We know that the square of a real number is always greater than 0.
Let \[a\] be a real number.
So \[{a^2} > 0\]
Add 1 both sides of the inequality.
\[1 + {a^2} > 1 + 0\]
\[ \Rightarrow 1 + a \cdot a > 1\]
\[ \Rightarrow 1 + a \cdot a > 0\]
So, \[\left( {a,a} \right) \in R\]. Thus \[R\] is reflexive.
Let \[a\] and \[b\] be any two real numbers such that \[\left( {a,b} \right) \in R\].
Since \[\left( {a,b} \right) \in R\], so \[1 + ab > 0\].
We can rewrite the inequality as \[1 + ba > 0\], since multiplication follows commutative property.
The inequality \[1 + ba > 0\] implies \[\left( {b,a} \right) \in R\].
Thus \[R\] is symmetric.
Let \[a\], \[b\], and \[c\] be any three real numbers such that \[\left( {a,b} \right) \in R\] and \[\left( {b,c} \right) \in R\].
Let \[a = - 12\], \[b = - 3\], and \[c = \frac{1}{6}\]
\[1 + ab = 1 + \left( { - 12} \right)\left( { - 3} \right) = 37 > 0\]
\[1 + bc = 1 + \left( { - 3} \right)\left( {\frac{1}{6}} \right) = 0.5 > 0\]
\[1 + ac = 1 + \left( { - 12} \right)\left( {\frac{1}{6}} \right) = - 2\ngtr{ 0}\]
Here \[1 + ac\ngtr{ 0 }\], so \[\left( {a,c} \right) \notin R\].
Hence \[R\] is not transitive.
Hence option A is the correct option.
Note:Student often use the inequalities \[1 + ab > 0\], \[1 + bc > 0\] to reach the inequality \[1 + ac > 0\]. But in this process, it impossible to reach the result. The easiest way to check transitive property is by letting the value of \[a\], \[b\] and \[c\]and then put the value of it’s in the inequality.
Recently Updated Pages
Geometry of Complex Numbers – Topics, Reception, Audience and Related Readings

JEE Main 2021 July 25 Shift 1 Question Paper with Answer Key

JEE Main 2021 July 22 Shift 2 Question Paper with Answer Key

JEE Atomic Structure and Chemical Bonding important Concepts and Tips

JEE Amino Acids and Peptides Important Concepts and Tips for Exam Preparation

JEE Electricity and Magnetism Important Concepts and Tips for Exam Preparation

Trending doubts
JEE Main 2025 Session 2: Application Form (Out), Exam Dates (Released), Eligibility, & More

Atomic Structure - Electrons, Protons, Neutrons and Atomic Models

Displacement-Time Graph and Velocity-Time Graph for JEE

JEE Main 2025: Derivation of Equation of Trajectory in Physics

Learn About Angle Of Deviation In Prism: JEE Main Physics 2025

Electric Field Due to Uniformly Charged Ring for JEE Main 2025 - Formula and Derivation

Other Pages
JEE Advanced Marks vs Ranks 2025: Understanding Category-wise Qualifying Marks and Previous Year Cut-offs

JEE Advanced Weightage 2025 Chapter-Wise for Physics, Maths and Chemistry

Degree of Dissociation and Its Formula With Solved Example for JEE

Instantaneous Velocity - Formula based Examples for JEE

JEE Main 2025: Conversion of Galvanometer Into Ammeter And Voltmeter in Physics

JEE Advanced 2025 Notes
