If [.] denotes the greatest integer function, then find the value of $\mathop {\lim }\limits_{n \to \infty } \dfrac{{\left[ x \right] + \left[ {2x} \right] + .......... + \left[ {nx} \right]}}{{{n^2}}}$ is,
Answer
282.3k+ views
Hint: In this particular question use the concept that [x] is greater than or less than equal to x, so [x] is written as, $x - 1 < \left[ x \right] \leqslant x$, and later on use the concept of sandwich theorem, so use these concepts to reach the solution of the question.
Complete step-by-step answer:
Given data
[.] denotes the greatest integer function.
So according to the definition of the greatest integer function we have,
$ \Rightarrow x - 1 < \left[ x \right] \leqslant x$................ (1)
Similarly,
$ \Rightarrow 2x - 1 < \left[ {2x} \right] \leqslant 2x$
$ \Rightarrow 3x - 1 < \left[ {3x} \right] \leqslant 3x$
.
.
.
$ \Rightarrow nx - 1 < \left[ {nx} \right] \leqslant nx$
Now add all these equation we have,
$ \Rightarrow \left( {x + 2x + 3x + .... + nx} \right) - \left( {1 + 1 + 1 + ...... + 1} \right) < \left( {\left[ x \right] + \left[ {2x} \right] + \left[ {3x} \right] + ....... + \left[ {nx} \right]} \right) \leqslant \left( {x + 2x + 3x + .....nx} \right)$
Now as we know that 1 + 1 + 1 +...... + 1 up to n terms is equal to n so we have,
$ \Rightarrow x\left( {1 + 2 + 3 + .... + n} \right) - n < \left( {\left[ x \right] + \left[ {2x} \right] + \left[ {3x} \right] + ....... + \left[ {nx} \right]} \right) \leqslant x\left( {1 + 2 + 3 + .....n} \right)$
Now as we know that 1 + 2 + 3 +...... + n is the summation of first n terms whose sum is given as, $\dfrac{{n\left( {n + 1} \right)}}{2}$ so we have,
$ \Rightarrow x\left( {\dfrac{{n\left( {n + 1} \right)}}{2}} \right) - n < \left( {\left[ x \right] + \left[ {2x} \right] + \left[ {3x} \right] + ....... + \left[ {nx} \right]} \right) \leqslant x\dfrac{{n\left( {n + 1} \right)}}{2}$
Now divide by ${n^2}$ throughout we have,
$ \Rightarrow \dfrac{{x\left( {\dfrac{{n\left( {n + 1} \right)}}{2}} \right) - n}}{{{n^2}}} < \left( {\dfrac{{\left[ x \right] + \left[ {2x} \right] + \left[ {3x} \right] + ....... + \left[ {nx} \right]}}{{{n^2}}}} \right) \leqslant \dfrac{{x\dfrac{{n\left( {n + 1} \right)}}{2}}}{{{n^2}}}$
$ \Rightarrow x\left( {\dfrac{{n\left( {n + 1} \right)}}{{2{n^2}}}} \right) - \dfrac{1}{n} < \left( {\dfrac{{\left[ x \right] + \left[ {2x} \right] + \left[ {3x} \right] + ....... + \left[ {nx} \right]}}{{{n^2}}}} \right) \leqslant x\dfrac{{n\left( {n + 1} \right)}}{{2{n^2}}}$
$ \Rightarrow \dfrac{x}{2}\left( {1 + \dfrac{1}{n}} \right) - \dfrac{1}{n} < \left( {\dfrac{{\left[ x \right] + \left[ {2x} \right] + \left[ {3x} \right] + ....... + \left[ {nx} \right]}}{{{n^2}}}} \right) \leqslant \dfrac{x}{2}\left( {1 + \dfrac{1}{n}} \right)$
Now apply $\mathop {\lim }\limits_{n \to \infty } $in all of the terms we have,
$ \Rightarrow \mathop {\lim }\limits_{n \to \infty } \left( {\dfrac{x}{2}\left( {1 + \dfrac{1}{n}} \right) - \dfrac{1}{n}} \right) < \mathop {\lim }\limits_{n \to \infty } \left( {\dfrac{{\left[ x \right] + \left[ {2x} \right] + \left[ {3x} \right] + ....... + \left[ {nx} \right]}}{{{n^2}}}} \right) \leqslant \mathop {\lim }\limits_{n \to \infty } \left( {\dfrac{x}{2}\left( {1 + \dfrac{1}{n}} \right)} \right)$
Now as we know that when, $n \to \infty \Rightarrow \dfrac{1}{n} \to 0$ so we have,
$ \Rightarrow \dfrac{x}{2} < \mathop {\lim }\limits_{n \to \infty } \left( {\dfrac{{\left[ x \right] + \left[ {2x} \right] + \left[ {3x} \right] + ....... + \left[ {nx} \right]}}{{{n^2}}}} \right) \leqslant \dfrac{x}{2}$
Now according to sandwich theorem if, $\mathop {\lim }\limits_{x \to \infty } h\left( x \right) < \mathop {\lim }\limits_{x \to \infty } g\left( x \right) \leqslant \mathop {\lim }\limits_{x \to \infty } f\left( x \right)$ and $\mathop {\lim }\limits_{x \to \infty } h\left( x \right) = \mathop {\lim }\limits_{x \to \infty } f\left( x \right) = P$ then $\mathop {\lim }\limits_{x \to \infty } g\left( x \right) = P$ so we have,
$ \Rightarrow \mathop {\lim }\limits_{n \to \infty } \left( {\dfrac{{\left[ x \right] + \left[ {2x} \right] + \left[ {3x} \right] + ....... + \left[ {nx} \right]}}{{{n^2}}}} \right) = \dfrac{x}{2}$
So this is the required answer.
Note: Whenever we face such types of questions the key concept we have to remember is that always recall the sum of first n terms and always recall the sandwich theorem that if $\mathop {\lim }\limits_{x \to \infty } h\left( x \right) < \mathop {\lim }\limits_{x \to \infty } g\left( x \right) \leqslant \mathop {\lim }\limits_{x \to \infty } f\left( x \right)$, and $\mathop {\lim }\limits_{x \to \infty } h\left( x \right) = \mathop {\lim }\limits_{x \to \infty } f\left( x \right) = P$ then $\mathop {\lim }\limits_{x \to \infty } g\left( x \right) = P$
Complete step-by-step answer:
Given data
[.] denotes the greatest integer function.
So according to the definition of the greatest integer function we have,
$ \Rightarrow x - 1 < \left[ x \right] \leqslant x$................ (1)
Similarly,
$ \Rightarrow 2x - 1 < \left[ {2x} \right] \leqslant 2x$
$ \Rightarrow 3x - 1 < \left[ {3x} \right] \leqslant 3x$
.
.
.
$ \Rightarrow nx - 1 < \left[ {nx} \right] \leqslant nx$
Now add all these equation we have,
$ \Rightarrow \left( {x + 2x + 3x + .... + nx} \right) - \left( {1 + 1 + 1 + ...... + 1} \right) < \left( {\left[ x \right] + \left[ {2x} \right] + \left[ {3x} \right] + ....... + \left[ {nx} \right]} \right) \leqslant \left( {x + 2x + 3x + .....nx} \right)$
Now as we know that 1 + 1 + 1 +...... + 1 up to n terms is equal to n so we have,
$ \Rightarrow x\left( {1 + 2 + 3 + .... + n} \right) - n < \left( {\left[ x \right] + \left[ {2x} \right] + \left[ {3x} \right] + ....... + \left[ {nx} \right]} \right) \leqslant x\left( {1 + 2 + 3 + .....n} \right)$
Now as we know that 1 + 2 + 3 +...... + n is the summation of first n terms whose sum is given as, $\dfrac{{n\left( {n + 1} \right)}}{2}$ so we have,
$ \Rightarrow x\left( {\dfrac{{n\left( {n + 1} \right)}}{2}} \right) - n < \left( {\left[ x \right] + \left[ {2x} \right] + \left[ {3x} \right] + ....... + \left[ {nx} \right]} \right) \leqslant x\dfrac{{n\left( {n + 1} \right)}}{2}$
Now divide by ${n^2}$ throughout we have,
$ \Rightarrow \dfrac{{x\left( {\dfrac{{n\left( {n + 1} \right)}}{2}} \right) - n}}{{{n^2}}} < \left( {\dfrac{{\left[ x \right] + \left[ {2x} \right] + \left[ {3x} \right] + ....... + \left[ {nx} \right]}}{{{n^2}}}} \right) \leqslant \dfrac{{x\dfrac{{n\left( {n + 1} \right)}}{2}}}{{{n^2}}}$
$ \Rightarrow x\left( {\dfrac{{n\left( {n + 1} \right)}}{{2{n^2}}}} \right) - \dfrac{1}{n} < \left( {\dfrac{{\left[ x \right] + \left[ {2x} \right] + \left[ {3x} \right] + ....... + \left[ {nx} \right]}}{{{n^2}}}} \right) \leqslant x\dfrac{{n\left( {n + 1} \right)}}{{2{n^2}}}$
$ \Rightarrow \dfrac{x}{2}\left( {1 + \dfrac{1}{n}} \right) - \dfrac{1}{n} < \left( {\dfrac{{\left[ x \right] + \left[ {2x} \right] + \left[ {3x} \right] + ....... + \left[ {nx} \right]}}{{{n^2}}}} \right) \leqslant \dfrac{x}{2}\left( {1 + \dfrac{1}{n}} \right)$
Now apply $\mathop {\lim }\limits_{n \to \infty } $in all of the terms we have,
$ \Rightarrow \mathop {\lim }\limits_{n \to \infty } \left( {\dfrac{x}{2}\left( {1 + \dfrac{1}{n}} \right) - \dfrac{1}{n}} \right) < \mathop {\lim }\limits_{n \to \infty } \left( {\dfrac{{\left[ x \right] + \left[ {2x} \right] + \left[ {3x} \right] + ....... + \left[ {nx} \right]}}{{{n^2}}}} \right) \leqslant \mathop {\lim }\limits_{n \to \infty } \left( {\dfrac{x}{2}\left( {1 + \dfrac{1}{n}} \right)} \right)$
Now as we know that when, $n \to \infty \Rightarrow \dfrac{1}{n} \to 0$ so we have,
$ \Rightarrow \dfrac{x}{2} < \mathop {\lim }\limits_{n \to \infty } \left( {\dfrac{{\left[ x \right] + \left[ {2x} \right] + \left[ {3x} \right] + ....... + \left[ {nx} \right]}}{{{n^2}}}} \right) \leqslant \dfrac{x}{2}$
Now according to sandwich theorem if, $\mathop {\lim }\limits_{x \to \infty } h\left( x \right) < \mathop {\lim }\limits_{x \to \infty } g\left( x \right) \leqslant \mathop {\lim }\limits_{x \to \infty } f\left( x \right)$ and $\mathop {\lim }\limits_{x \to \infty } h\left( x \right) = \mathop {\lim }\limits_{x \to \infty } f\left( x \right) = P$ then $\mathop {\lim }\limits_{x \to \infty } g\left( x \right) = P$ so we have,
$ \Rightarrow \mathop {\lim }\limits_{n \to \infty } \left( {\dfrac{{\left[ x \right] + \left[ {2x} \right] + \left[ {3x} \right] + ....... + \left[ {nx} \right]}}{{{n^2}}}} \right) = \dfrac{x}{2}$
So this is the required answer.
Note: Whenever we face such types of questions the key concept we have to remember is that always recall the sum of first n terms and always recall the sandwich theorem that if $\mathop {\lim }\limits_{x \to \infty } h\left( x \right) < \mathop {\lim }\limits_{x \to \infty } g\left( x \right) \leqslant \mathop {\lim }\limits_{x \to \infty } f\left( x \right)$, and $\mathop {\lim }\limits_{x \to \infty } h\left( x \right) = \mathop {\lim }\limits_{x \to \infty } f\left( x \right) = P$ then $\mathop {\lim }\limits_{x \to \infty } g\left( x \right) = P$
Recently Updated Pages
Geometry of Complex Numbers Explained

Mutually Exclusive vs Independent Events: Key Differences Explained

Area vs Volume: Key Differences Explained for Students

JEE Main 2025-26 Mock Test: Binomial Theorem & Quick Practice

Properties of Solids and Liquids Mock Test 2025

JEE Main Mock Test 2025-26: Principles Related To Practical

Trending doubts
JEE Main 2026: Exam Dates, Session 2 Updates, City Slip, Admit Card & Latest News

Understanding the Electric Field of a Uniformly Charged Ring

Understanding Atomic Structure for Beginners

Derivation of Equation of Trajectory Explained for Students

Electron Gain Enthalpy and Electron Affinity Explained

How to Convert a Galvanometer into an Ammeter or Voltmeter

Other Pages
JEE Advanced Percentile vs Marks 2026: JEE Main Cutoff, AIR & IIT Admission Guide

JEE Advanced 2026 Notification Out with Exam Date, Registration (Extended), Syllabus and More

Understanding Instantaneous Velocity

Understanding Electromagnetic Waves and Their Importance

JEE Advanced Weightage Chapter Wise 2026 for Physics, Chemistry, and Mathematics

Understanding the Angle of Deviation in a Prism

