Before heading onto the advantages and disadvantages of Centralization and Decentralization, one needs to understand properly, what do the terms- Centralization and Decentralization. Only then, you can fully understand the merits and demerits of Centralization, also, the merits and demerits of Decentralization. As they both help us to determine the fiscal situation of a firm or country.
What is Centralization?
Centralization is an organizational structure that gives the ability of decision-making responsibilities to higher management. Few selected members are given the authority to create and determine strategies and goals. It also clarifies the motives and mission of the organization which must follow to achieve its goals.
In centralization, the type of organizational structure allows higher management to create the rules including procedures that are used to communicate with lower-level employees. Lower-level employees have to obey the rules made by the higher management organization without doubting the rules and regulations.
What is Decentralization?
Decentralization is an organizational structure where the delegates are assigned to manage the organization. They are selected by the higher authorities. The selected candidates are mostly their middle and lower subordinates.
The decentralization type of management helps to organize daily duties. They also participate in minor decision-making. A lot of responsibilities are given to the middle and lower levels subordinates.
Due to the well-distributed job roles, the higher management authorities get a chance to focus more on major business decisions.
Advantages and Disadvantages of Centralization
Merits of centralization:
Whenever the employees of middle to lower-level management face a problem regarding work and need a few changes, they can go to the higher-level management authorities. Centralization makes the decision-making, problem-solving matters easy as it helps them to keep them in proper order and all the final decisions are taken by the higher management authority.
All the middle to lower-level employees are the workers under higher management authorities. Whatever works they are given by higher-level management they keep a check on them because every lower lever worker is answerable to higher authorities. So, in fear of supervision, they tend to do their daily duties properly. It is one of the reasons for a better quality of work with high productivity.
The higher-level of management has more experience than other people. They tend to have more business experience and knowledge. They have the idea of how to deal with specific situations and how to not. With their knowledge based on their experience, they tend to be better decision-makers for the centralized organization.
Every organization be it centralized or other they have a plan or a vision that they want to see to accomplish in the coming years. For the success in the future, it can’t be expected from the efforts but if they have centralized or higher-level authorities which have power in the hand for deciding for the company’s good. They can decide on their vision for the future with full focus.
They will make the workers of the company achieve the goals for the company.
So, having a centralized organization will have only the top management for decision making while the employees will be responsible for only work not for decision making.
Demerits of Centralization:
The lower-level authorities work under the guidance of their superiors, who are eligible to take any decisions whenever required.
They don’t have the exposure to show their skills as they have to follow the rules and order by the higher authorities. They feel demotivated while working as they have no chance of getting a promotion.
In a centralized organization, the decision-maker has the power. Employees tend to work under them according to their rules. In such situations, their work outcome is not creative. With the controlled nature of the centralized organization, their productivity suffers the most.
As the worker is constantly working under rules and supervision via higher authorities, they get the feeling of slaves rather than organization employees. This leads to disloyalty and they tend to leave when they receive a better opportunity.
Employees at lower levels need to depend on the decision made by top management which decreases productivity. They tend to waste time on the decision-making processes by the higher authorities.
Merits and Demerits of Decentralization
There are several advantages and disadvantages of fiscal decentralization. Decentralized decision-making advantages and disadvantages also, helps us to understand the correct way to approach any fiscal problem and take adequate decisions. So without any further adieu, let's find out the advantages and disadvantages of Decentralization.
Merits of Decentralization:
Decentralization allows middle to lower authorities to participate in the decision-making processes. It helps to reduce the pressure of higher authorities. Higher authorities can easily focus on more important works rather than on minor decision-making processes.
Decentralization allows the employee to show their creativity and skills. It helps the employee for their power and independence.
In a decentralized organization, the decision-making process is quite quicker than centralization. From the middle to the lower level, employees are allowed to make minor decisions. Based on the situation, they can take ownership of the required action and implementation.
Decentralization motivates their employees as there are chances to show their skills without the interference of top management. This allows improving the quality of work.
Demerits of Decentralization
In a decentralized organization, many employees are required to be hired according to their work experiences and knowledge. This criterion increases the cost of the company, as more money is spent to hire the most eligible people for the job profile.
In decentralization, there is no uniformity because every manager has their ways to make people work.
Decentralization is not effective for building small firms. It is effective because it involves a high amount of cost to run the organization.