
J (Joule’s mechanical equivalent of heat) is equal to
A) 2400 J
B) $4.18\,{\text{J/cal}}$
C) $2.2\,\,{\text{J/cal}}$
D) 1000 J
Answer
218.7k+ views
Hint: The Joule’s mechanical equivalent of heat is defined as the amount of work that must be done in the form of mechanical energy on a system to produce heat energy. It is defined as the ratio of the work done on the system and heat energy generated by the system.
Complete step by step answer:
The term mechanical equivalent of heat suggests that the mechanical equivalent of energy, motion, and heat energy associated with Joules are mutually interchangeable. This implies that for some systems, work and heat energy can be converted into each other and we can provide one kind of energy to make the system do work in another form. For example, we can use heat energy generated by steam to power a turbine which is in the form of mechanical energy.
The mechanical equivalent of heat is the ratio of the mechanical work done by a system to the heat supplied to the system. The number of units of work or energy equals one unit of heat, as \[4.1858\], which equals one small calorie and is the classical definition of the mechanical equivalent of heat.
Hence the correct choice is option (B).
Note: In practical scenarios, there is always some energy loss while converting from mechanical to heat energy or vice versa. Joule’s mechanical equivalent of heat is a dimensionless constant which tells us the amount of work that can be done by providing heat energy to the system. Since it is a dimensionless term, we can eliminate options (A) and (D) directly since they have dimensions of energy/work done.
Complete step by step answer:
The term mechanical equivalent of heat suggests that the mechanical equivalent of energy, motion, and heat energy associated with Joules are mutually interchangeable. This implies that for some systems, work and heat energy can be converted into each other and we can provide one kind of energy to make the system do work in another form. For example, we can use heat energy generated by steam to power a turbine which is in the form of mechanical energy.
The mechanical equivalent of heat is the ratio of the mechanical work done by a system to the heat supplied to the system. The number of units of work or energy equals one unit of heat, as \[4.1858\], which equals one small calorie and is the classical definition of the mechanical equivalent of heat.
Hence the correct choice is option (B).
Note: In practical scenarios, there is always some energy loss while converting from mechanical to heat energy or vice versa. Joule’s mechanical equivalent of heat is a dimensionless constant which tells us the amount of work that can be done by providing heat energy to the system. Since it is a dimensionless term, we can eliminate options (A) and (D) directly since they have dimensions of energy/work done.
Recently Updated Pages
Two discs which are rotating about their respective class 11 physics JEE_Main

A ladder rests against a frictionless vertical wall class 11 physics JEE_Main

Two simple pendulums of lengths 1 m and 16 m respectively class 11 physics JEE_Main

The slopes of isothermal and adiabatic curves are related class 11 physics JEE_Main

A trolly falling freely on an inclined plane as shown class 11 physics JEE_Main

The masses M1 and M2M2 M1 are released from rest Using class 11 physics JEE_Main

Trending doubts
Understanding Collisions: Types and Examples for Students

Understanding Atomic Structure for Beginners

Understanding Centrifugal Force in Physics

Understanding Electromagnetic Waves and Their Importance

What Are Elastic Collisions in One Dimension?

Understanding Excess Pressure Inside a Liquid Drop

Other Pages
NCERT Solutions For Class 11 Physics Chapter 4 Laws Of Motion

NCERT Solutions for Class 11 Physics Chapter 3 Motion In A Plane 2025-26

NCERT Solutions For Class 11 Physics Chapter 12 Kinetic Theory - 2025-26

NCERT Solutions For Class 11 Physics Chapter 13 Oscillations - 2025-26

Motion In A Plane Class 11 Physics Chapter 3 CBSE Notes - 2025-26

Understanding Elastic Collisions in Two Dimensions

