
Assertion: The emf of the driver cell in the potentiometer experiment should be greater than the emf of the cell to be determined.
Reason: The fall of potential across the potentiometer wire should not be less than the emf of the cell to be determined.
(A) Both Assertion and Reason are correct and Reason is the correct explanation for Assertion
(B) Both Assertion and Reason are correct but Reason is not the correct explanation for Assertion
(C) Assertion is correct but Reason is incorrect
(D) Assertion is incorrect but Reason is correct
Answer
529.5k+ views
Hint: If emf of the driver cell in the potentiometer is not greater than the emf of the cell, the fall of potential across the potentiometer wire would not be greater than the emf of the cell to be determined and there will be no balance point.
Complete step by step solution:
In this experiment, we determine the emf of a cell which is not known to us using a potentiometer. A potentiometer has a wire which is generally several meters long. It is stretched between two points A and B on a wooden board. We take two cells with emf’s \[{E_1}{\text{ }}\] and ${E_2}$ out of which one of them is known to us. The positive terminal of \[{E_1}\] is connected to the end A and negative terminal to a jockey and galvanometer.
When a steady current starts flowing through the circuit, we start moving our jockey along wire AB in a way such that the deflection in the galvanometer becomes zero. This is our balance point.

At this point the potential drop across this particular length of wire balances the emf When a steady current starts flowing through the circuit, we start moving our jockey along wire AB in a way such that the deflection in the galvanometer becomes zero. This is our balance point. At this point the potential drop across this particular length of wire balances the emf \[{E_1}\] that we are supposed to determine. Then we use the formula: \[{E_1} = \dfrac{{{L_1}}}{{{L_2}}}{E_2}\] to determine \[{E_1}\].
However, if the emf of the driving cell (\[{E_2}\]) was not greater than the emf to be determined (\[{E_1}\]), the potential drop across wire AB would also have been lesser than the emf to be determined (\[{E_1}\]) and we would never have obtained a balance point, i.e. \[{L_1}\] or \[{L_2}\].
Therefore, both the Assertion and Reason given in the question are correct and the given Reason is also the correct explanation for the Assertion.
Option (A) is correct.
Note: The basic principle on which a potentiometer works is that the potential drop across the potentiometer wire is directly proportional to its length$ \Rightarrow E \propto L \Rightarrow \dfrac{{{E_1}}}{{{E_2}}} = \dfrac{{{L_1}}}{{{L_2}}} \Rightarrow {E_1} = \dfrac{{{L_1}}}{{{L_2}}}{E_2}$.
Complete step by step solution:
In this experiment, we determine the emf of a cell which is not known to us using a potentiometer. A potentiometer has a wire which is generally several meters long. It is stretched between two points A and B on a wooden board. We take two cells with emf’s \[{E_1}{\text{ }}\] and ${E_2}$ out of which one of them is known to us. The positive terminal of \[{E_1}\] is connected to the end A and negative terminal to a jockey and galvanometer.
When a steady current starts flowing through the circuit, we start moving our jockey along wire AB in a way such that the deflection in the galvanometer becomes zero. This is our balance point.

At this point the potential drop across this particular length of wire balances the emf When a steady current starts flowing through the circuit, we start moving our jockey along wire AB in a way such that the deflection in the galvanometer becomes zero. This is our balance point. At this point the potential drop across this particular length of wire balances the emf \[{E_1}\] that we are supposed to determine. Then we use the formula: \[{E_1} = \dfrac{{{L_1}}}{{{L_2}}}{E_2}\] to determine \[{E_1}\].
However, if the emf of the driving cell (\[{E_2}\]) was not greater than the emf to be determined (\[{E_1}\]), the potential drop across wire AB would also have been lesser than the emf to be determined (\[{E_1}\]) and we would never have obtained a balance point, i.e. \[{L_1}\] or \[{L_2}\].
Therefore, both the Assertion and Reason given in the question are correct and the given Reason is also the correct explanation for the Assertion.
Option (A) is correct.
Note: The basic principle on which a potentiometer works is that the potential drop across the potentiometer wire is directly proportional to its length$ \Rightarrow E \propto L \Rightarrow \dfrac{{{E_1}}}{{{E_2}}} = \dfrac{{{L_1}}}{{{L_2}}} \Rightarrow {E_1} = \dfrac{{{L_1}}}{{{L_2}}}{E_2}$.
Recently Updated Pages
Circuit Switching vs Packet Switching: Key Differences Explained

JEE General Topics in Chemistry Important Concepts and Tips

JEE Extractive Metallurgy Important Concepts and Tips for Exam Preparation

JEE Amino Acids and Peptides Important Concepts and Tips for Exam Preparation

JEE Atomic Structure and Chemical Bonding important Concepts and Tips

Electricity and Magnetism Explained: Key Concepts & Applications

Trending doubts
JEE Main 2026: Session 2 Registration Open, City Intimation Slip, Exam Dates, Syllabus & Eligibility

JEE Main 2026 Application Login: Direct Link, Registration, Form Fill, and Steps

JEE Main Marking Scheme 2026- Paper-Wise Marks Distribution and Negative Marking Details

Understanding the Angle of Deviation in a Prism

Hybridisation in Chemistry – Concept, Types & Applications

How to Convert a Galvanometer into an Ammeter or Voltmeter

Other Pages
JEE Advanced Marks vs Ranks 2025: Understanding Category-wise Qualifying Marks and Previous Year Cut-offs

Dual Nature of Radiation and Matter Class 12 Physics Chapter 11 CBSE Notes - 2025-26

Understanding Uniform Acceleration in Physics

Understanding the Electric Field of a Uniformly Charged Ring

JEE Advanced Weightage 2025 Chapter-Wise for Physics, Maths and Chemistry

Derivation of Equation of Trajectory Explained for Students

