Courses
Courses for Kids
Free study material
Offline Centres
More
Store Icon
Store

Cayley Hamilton Theorem

ffImage
Last updated date: 28th Apr 2024
Total views: 440.7k
Views today: 12.40k
hightlight icon
highlight icon
highlight icon
share icon
copy icon

What is the Cayley Hamilton Theorem?

Cayley–Hamilton theorem says that each square matrix over a commutative ring (including the real or complex field) agrees with its equation. If A is assumed as n×n matrix and In is the identity matrix, then the distinctive polynomial of A is expressed as

 

P(x) = det (xln - A)

 

Where det stands for determinant operation and for the scalar element of the base ring, the variable would be considered as x. As the inputs of the matrix are (linear or polynomial) in x, the det or determinant is also considered as an nth order monic polynomial in x.

 

A polynomial m(x) is therefore said to be the minimal polynomial of A if (i) m(A) = 0; (ii) m(x) is a monic polynomial (the coefficient of the highest degree term is 1); (iii) if a polynomial g(x) is such that g(A) = 0, then m(x) divides g(x).

 

History of Cayley-Hamilton Theorem

Hamilton Theorem was proved in the year 1855 in terms of a linear function of the quaternion, a non-commutative ring by Cayley-Hamilton. This theorem persists for general quaternion matrices. This complies with the specific illustration of certain real 4x4 matrices over 2x2 complex matrices. Cayley–Hamilton stated Hamilton Theorem for 3x3 small matrices, but able to publish a proof for the 2x2 case. The general case was initially verified by Frobenius in 1878.

Computation of the Matrix Exponential e At The matrix exponential is simply one case of an analytic function as described above. e At = nX−1 k=0 αkAk (5) where the αi ’s are determined from the set of equations given by the eigenvalues of A. e λit = nX−1 k=0 αkλ k i

Every square matrix satisfies its characteristic equation, that is, if f(x) is the characteristic polynomial of a square matrix A, then f(A) = 0.

A polynomial m(x) is said to be the minimal polynomial of A if (a) m(A) = 0; (b) m(x) is a monic polynomial ( i.e, the coefficient of the highest degree term is 1); (c) if a polynomial g(x) is such that g(A) = 0, then m(x) divides g(x). 

The minimal polynomial of a matrix is unique. The minimal polynomial divides its characteristic polynomial.

The minimal polynomial and the characteristic polynomial have the same roots. Here is the proof : If we let f(x) and m(x) be the characteristic and minimal polynomial of a matrix respectively, then f(x) = g(x)m(x). If α is a root of m(x), then it is also a root of f(x). Simultaneously, if α is a root of f(x), then α is an eigenvalue of the matrix. Thus, there is also  a non-zero eigenvector v such that Av = αv, this implies m(A)v = m(α)v, i.e., m(α)v = 0, and v 6= 0 so that m(α) = 0.

Similar matrices have the same minimal polynomials. Here is the proof : If we let A and B be two similar matrices, then A = P −1BP for some invertible matrix P. Let m1(x) = a0 + a1x + . . . + x n and m2(x) = b0 + b1x + . . . + x l be the respective minimal polynomials of A and B. Then m2(A) = 0, which implies m1(x)|m2(x). Similarly m1(B) = 0, which implies m2(x)|m1(x). 

Let A ∈ Mn(F) and λ1, λ2, . . . , λk ∈ F be all eigenvalues of A, where λi 6= λj

for i 6= j. The matrix A is diagonalizable if and only if its minimal polynomial is a product of distinct linear polynomials,

that is, m(x) = (x − λ1)(x − λ2)· · ·(x − λk), where λi’s are distinct elements of F.

A matrix A ∈ Mn(R) such that A2 − 3A + 2I = 0 is diagonalizable. Let’s take g(x) = x 2 − 3x + 2, then g(A) = 0. Note that g(x) = (x − 1)(x − 2) and the minimal polynomial m(x) of A divides g(x). Therefore, either m(x) = (x − 1) or m(x) = (x − 2) or m(x) = (x − 1)(x − 2). In either case, the minimal polynomial is a product of distinct linear polynomials, hence diagonalizable.

 

Hamilton Theorem Proof

The Hamilton theorem states that if matrices A will be replaced instead of x in polynomial, p (x) = det (xln- A), it will give away the zero matrices, such as

P (A) = 0

The theory states that the nxn matrix is eradicated by its characteristic polynomial det (ti- a) which is monic of degree n. The power of A is found by replacing the power of x, which is identified by recurrent matrix multiplication, the constant term of p(x) yields a multiple of the power A₀, which power is indicated as identity matrix. This theorem permits Aᶯ to be considered as a linear combination of matrix power of A. If the ring is assumed as a field, the Cayley–Hamilton theorem would be equal to the statement which states that the smallest polynomial of a square matrix will be divided by its characteristic polynomial.

Computation of the Matrix Exponential e At The matrix exponential is simply one case of an analytic function as described above. e At = nX−1 k=0 αkAk (5) where the αi ’s are determined from the set of equations given by the eight values of A. e λit = NX−1 k=0 αkλ k i.

 

Cayley-Hamilton Theorem Example

Here you can see, Cayley-Hamilton theorem example based on Cayley-Hamilton Theorem proof which is stated above.

Example- If A is 3×3 matrix, then is characteristics equation would be considered as

=  │A-λI│ = 0

= λ³ + C1 λ2 + C2λ + C3I

= Substituting λ with A

= A³ +C1A2 + C2A + C3I

 

Explanation –

Let us consider A as n×n as a square matrix, then its characteristics polynomial will be stated as:

P (λ) =│A-λ In │ = 0

In = Identity matrix similar order as A

According to the Hamilton theorem:

P (A) = 0

Here 0, signifies the zero matrices of same order A

 

Cayley-Hamilton Theorem Solved Example - Will be uploaded soon.

Quiz Time

1. The Cayley-Hamilton theorem proof deals only with

a) Inverse Matrix

b) Square Matrix

c) Identity Matrix

d) Orthogonal Matrix

2. The number of rows and columns in the square matrix is

a) More than 10

b) Similar

c) Multiples of each other

d) Different


3.  Find characteristic polynomials, if the 2×2 matrix has 2 and 3 in the first row, 0 and 1 in the second row.

a) λ² - 3 λ + 2

b) λ² + 2

c) λ² + 3

d) λ² - 2 λ + 3


Fun Facts

  • The Cayley-Hamilton theorem was initially proved in the year 1853, in the form of the inverse of linear equation by a quaternion, a non -commutative ring through Hamilton

  • The result of the theory was first verified by Frobenius in the year 1878.

  • The first record of the Cayley-Hamilton theorem was accidentally created by William Rowan Hamilton in his book “Lectures on Quaternions”.

  • Arthur Cayley in 1858 applied Hamilton theory in the world of the matrix.

  • The expected results can be seen when the same theory is applied by Cayley in the matrix of size 3×3. Thus the Cayley-Hamilton theorem was discovered.

FAQs on Cayley Hamilton Theorem

1. What is known as the Characteristics Polynomial in Hamilton Theorem?

The characteristic polynomial is a polynomial that gives information about the matrix. It is closely associated with the determinant of the matrix and the roots of the characteristic polynomial are eigenvalues of a matrix.

          

The characteristics equation of the characteristics polynomial sets the matrix equation to zero.


The characteristics polynomial P(x) of an n×n matrix M is given in the below equation:


P(x) = det (xI –M)


I in the above equation denote the identity Matrix.


Two matrices M and N will be considered identical if there exists a Matrix A such that  N=A-1MA


= det (xI –M) = det (A-1 A) det (Xi –M)


= det (A-1) det (xI –M) det (A)


= det (A-1 xIA- A - A-1 MA)


= det(x A-1 A-N)


= det (Xi –N)


Hence and N are similar characteristics polynomial

2. State and Prove Cayley-Hamilton Theorem

Cayley-Hamilton theorem states that a matrix agrees with its own equation. If the characteristics equation of an n×n matrix A will be λᶯ + aᶯ‾1 λᶯ‾1 + a₁ λ +a₀ = 0, then


Aᶯ + an-1 Aᶯ‾1 +…… + a₁A +a₀I = 0


Now we will prove the above theorem with an example:- will be updated soon

3. What is a polynomial?

A polynomial is an expression or a term in an appropriate language. Given a ring R, we can more appropriately define a polynomial as follows. First, we need to give a name to every element of the ring R, and we also need to give a name λ to a fixed new variable. where a1, a2, . . . are names of elements of the ring R. In the definition of polynomials we will also assume that the variable λ commutes with every element of the ring R. The evaluation operator substitutes the name of an element of R for the variable λ. Lemma 1 describes conditions under which certain polynomial identities are preserved under such a substitution. Such a definition more appropriately represents what is meant by a polynomial. In such a definition, polynomials belong to the syntax of the language describing the ring. When one studies the algebraic properties of polynomials, one needs to introduce an algebraic formalism to study the syntax. This was done in the formal definition of polynomials above in a way that the syntactic aspect of polynomials was only mentioned as an aside.  

4. Why should one refer to Vedantu?

All the reading materials at Vedantu are curated by subject-matter experts who have years of experience in the respective field. The content is well-researched and compiled into an easily readable format for the benefit of students. Students can refer to these resources with ease and learn things at their own pace. Most importantly all the content on Vedantu is provided for free and it can be easily downloaded into PDF from both the website and mobile application of Vedantu. 

5. How can I download reading material from Vedantu?

Accessing material from Vedantu is extremely easy and student-friendly. Students have to simply visit the website of  Vedantu and create an account. Once you have created the account you can simply explore the subjects and chapters that you are looking for. Click on the download button available on the website on Vedantu to download the reading material in PDF format. You can also access all the resources by downloading the Vedantu app from the play store.