
1mol of ferric oxalate is oxidized by ‘x’ mol of $Mn{{O}_{4}}^{-}$in acidic medium. Hence, the value of x is-
[A] 1.2
[B] 1.6
[C] 1.8
[D] 1.5
Answer
145.2k+ views
Hint: The reaction given to us is a redox reaction. Here carbon will be oxidised and manganese is reduced. We can solve this question by calculating the valency factor and number of moles of each. We can equate the equivalents of the oxidised and the reduced units and solve for x to get the answer.
Complete step by step answer:
We know that the formula of ferric oxalate is$F{{e}_{2}}{{({{C}_{2}}{{O}_{4}})}_{3}}$.
According to the question, ferric oxalate is oxidized by$Mn{{O}_{4}}^{-}$in acidic medium.
We can write the dissociation of ferric oxalate as-
\[F{{e}_{2}}{{({{C}_{2}}{{O}_{4}})}_{3}}\to 2F{{e}^{3+}}+3{{C}_{2}}{{O}_{4}}^{2-}\]
Here, iron is in +3 oxidation state which is its highest oxidation state therefore we cannot oxidize it further. Therefore, we have carbon left for oxidising. We can write the reaction as-
\[{{C}_{2}}{{O}_{4}}^{2-}\to 2{{C}^{4+}}\]
Here, the oxidation state of carbon changes from +3 to +4. For one molecule of ${{C}_{2}}{{O}_{4}}^{2-}$we have two molecules of ${{C}^{4+}}$and we have three molecules${{C}_{2}}{{O}_{4}}^{2-}$. Therefore, if we want to write the oxidation reaction for ${{({{C}_{2}}{{O}_{4}})}_{3}}^{2-}$atoms considering only the carbon atom, we will get-
\[3{{({{C}^{3+}})}_{2}}\to 6{{C}^{4+}}+6{{e}^{-}}\]
Here, carbon is oxidised from +3 to +6 by losing six electrons. Therefore, the valency factor will be 6.
Similarly, manganese in $Mn{{O}_{4}}^{-}$is reduced from +7 to +2. We can write the reaction as-
\[M{{n}^{+7}}+5{{e}^{-}}\to M{{n}^{2+}}\]
As we can see, manganese changes its oxidation state from +7 to +2 by accepting five electrons. Therefore, the valency factor will be 5.
We can equate the equivalents of the oxidised and the reduced as it is a redox reaction.
Therefore, number of moles of $F{{e}_{2}}{{({{C}_{2}}{{O}_{4}})}_{3}}$$\times $valency factor = number of moles of$Mn{{O}_{4}}^{-}$$\times $valency factor.
As we can see in the question, number of moles of $F{{e}_{2}}{{({{C}_{2}}{{O}_{4}})}_{3}}$is given as 1 and that of$Mn{{O}_{4}}^{-}$is x and we have calculated that the valency factor of $F{{e}_{2}}{{({{C}_{2}}{{O}_{4}})}_{3}}$is 6 and that of$Mn{{O}_{4}}^{-}$is 1.
Therefore, putting these values we will get-
\[1\times 6=x\times 5\]
Or, $x=\dfrac{6}{5}=1.2$
Therefore, from the above calculations, we have found that x is 1.2.
Therefore the correct answer is option [A] 1.2.
Note:
As the above reaction is a redox reaction where ferric oxalate is oxidised by$Mn{{O}_{4}}^{-}$, it is a redox reaction as carbon is oxidised and manganese is reduced, we can also write that n-factor will be the change in oxidation numbers of carbon and manganese and it will give us the same result as change in oxidation state for manganese is +7 to +2 which gives us 5 and for carbon it is +3 to +4 which gives us +1 but we have 6 carbon atoms in the balanced reaction therefore, it will be $6(no. Of moles)\times 1$ (change in oxidation state) which will be 6.
Complete step by step answer:
We know that the formula of ferric oxalate is$F{{e}_{2}}{{({{C}_{2}}{{O}_{4}})}_{3}}$.
According to the question, ferric oxalate is oxidized by$Mn{{O}_{4}}^{-}$in acidic medium.
We can write the dissociation of ferric oxalate as-
\[F{{e}_{2}}{{({{C}_{2}}{{O}_{4}})}_{3}}\to 2F{{e}^{3+}}+3{{C}_{2}}{{O}_{4}}^{2-}\]
Here, iron is in +3 oxidation state which is its highest oxidation state therefore we cannot oxidize it further. Therefore, we have carbon left for oxidising. We can write the reaction as-
\[{{C}_{2}}{{O}_{4}}^{2-}\to 2{{C}^{4+}}\]
Here, the oxidation state of carbon changes from +3 to +4. For one molecule of ${{C}_{2}}{{O}_{4}}^{2-}$we have two molecules of ${{C}^{4+}}$and we have three molecules${{C}_{2}}{{O}_{4}}^{2-}$. Therefore, if we want to write the oxidation reaction for ${{({{C}_{2}}{{O}_{4}})}_{3}}^{2-}$atoms considering only the carbon atom, we will get-
\[3{{({{C}^{3+}})}_{2}}\to 6{{C}^{4+}}+6{{e}^{-}}\]
Here, carbon is oxidised from +3 to +6 by losing six electrons. Therefore, the valency factor will be 6.
Similarly, manganese in $Mn{{O}_{4}}^{-}$is reduced from +7 to +2. We can write the reaction as-
\[M{{n}^{+7}}+5{{e}^{-}}\to M{{n}^{2+}}\]
As we can see, manganese changes its oxidation state from +7 to +2 by accepting five electrons. Therefore, the valency factor will be 5.
We can equate the equivalents of the oxidised and the reduced as it is a redox reaction.
Therefore, number of moles of $F{{e}_{2}}{{({{C}_{2}}{{O}_{4}})}_{3}}$$\times $valency factor = number of moles of$Mn{{O}_{4}}^{-}$$\times $valency factor.
As we can see in the question, number of moles of $F{{e}_{2}}{{({{C}_{2}}{{O}_{4}})}_{3}}$is given as 1 and that of$Mn{{O}_{4}}^{-}$is x and we have calculated that the valency factor of $F{{e}_{2}}{{({{C}_{2}}{{O}_{4}})}_{3}}$is 6 and that of$Mn{{O}_{4}}^{-}$is 1.
Therefore, putting these values we will get-
\[1\times 6=x\times 5\]
Or, $x=\dfrac{6}{5}=1.2$
Therefore, from the above calculations, we have found that x is 1.2.
Therefore the correct answer is option [A] 1.2.
Note:
As the above reaction is a redox reaction where ferric oxalate is oxidised by$Mn{{O}_{4}}^{-}$, it is a redox reaction as carbon is oxidised and manganese is reduced, we can also write that n-factor will be the change in oxidation numbers of carbon and manganese and it will give us the same result as change in oxidation state for manganese is +7 to +2 which gives us 5 and for carbon it is +3 to +4 which gives us +1 but we have 6 carbon atoms in the balanced reaction therefore, it will be $6(no. Of moles)\times 1$ (change in oxidation state) which will be 6.
Recently Updated Pages
Difference Between Vapor and Gas: JEE Main 2024

Area of an Octagon Formula - Explanation, and FAQs

Charle's Law Formula - Definition, Derivation and Solved Examples

Central Angle of a Circle Formula - Definition, Theorem and FAQs

Average Force Formula - Magnitude, Solved Examples and FAQs

Boyles Law Formula - Boyles Law Equation | Examples & Definitions

Trending doubts
JEE Main 2025 Session 2: Application Form (Out), Exam Dates (Released), Eligibility, & More

JEE Main 2025: Derivation of Equation of Trajectory in Physics

JEE Main Exam Marking Scheme: Detailed Breakdown of Marks and Negative Marking

Electric Field Due to Uniformly Charged Ring for JEE Main 2025 - Formula and Derivation

Degree of Dissociation and Its Formula With Solved Example for JEE

Learn About Angle Of Deviation In Prism: JEE Main Physics 2025

Other Pages
JEE Advanced Marks vs Ranks 2025: Understanding Category-wise Qualifying Marks and Previous Year Cut-offs

JEE Advanced 2025: Dates, Registration, Syllabus, Eligibility Criteria and More

JEE Advanced Weightage 2025 Chapter-Wise for Physics, Maths and Chemistry

Hydrocarbons Class 11 Notes: CBSE Chemistry Chapter 9

NCERT Solutions for Class 11 Chemistry In Hindi Chapter 1 Some Basic Concepts of Chemistry

Thermodynamics Class 11 Notes: CBSE Chapter 5
