

Who was Philip?
King Amyntas III of Macedonia and his wife, Queen Eurydice, had a son named Phillipe. He was born in 383 BCE, and after his father passed away, his elder brother became king. He was sent as a captive to Thebes, which was briefly the preeminent power in Greece, in order to secure his brother's good behaviour. Later, a brother who had risen to the position of king was able to obtain his freedom.
Phillip's brother, King Peridiccas, was killed by an Illyrian army during an invasion of his country. Phillip was named regent of his brother's eldest son, who was crowned King of Macedonia when he reached the age of maturity. Phillip was the most powerful man in the realm, while not being the king.
Let us learn more about the philip of macedon unifies greece, and how did philip of macedon unify greece in this article, provided by Vedantu.
Early Life and Accession of Philip II
Amyntas III had a son named Philip. His elder brothers Alexander II and Perdiccas III, who each reigned for a short years, fought unsuccessfully against insubordination of their regional vassal rulers, interference of the strong Greek city Thebes, and invasion by the Illyrians of the northwest frontier during his childhood.
(Image will be uploaded soon)
Philip himself was kept hostage in Thebes (370–360 BCE), the leading city of the decade (together with Athens), where the great Epaminondas, the most inventive tactician of all Greek generals till then, was in charge of Greece's best army. These were probably Philip's most formative years in college. Perdiccas, his brother, found him ready for a command when he returned to Macedonia.
(Image will be uploaded soon)
The phalanx was improved by Macedonian King Philip II and his son Alexander the Great's battle formation.
When Perdiccas was killed in battle against an Illyrian invasion in 359, Philip ascended to the throne quickly and unexpectedly. The Illyrians were preparing to close in, while the Paeonians raided from the north and two claimants to the throne were backed by foreign powers. During this time, Philip showed a good sense of priorities by buying off his hostile neighbours and ceding Amphipolis to Athens through a treaty. He put the time he had saved into military preparations.
The army that later conquered Persia was built during the course of his reign, but the decisive innovations in arms—the sarissa, a nearly one-and-a-half-times-longer pike than the Greek spear—tactics, and training are thought to have occurred during this first year.
Macedonian Expansion
Invading Paeonia in 358, he then decisively defeated the Illyrians in a fight that already suggests a master of war. His marriage to Olympias, the Molossian princess of Epirus (mother of Alexander the Great) the next year helped to secure his western frontier. Now he set out to enrage Athens by recapturing Amphipolis, the strategic key safeguarding the eastern frontier and providing access into Thrace; and in 356 he captured the west Thracian Crenides (renamed Philippi by him), a town established to exploit new silver and gold discoveries in Mount Pangaeus.
These successes frightened his neighbours, prompting them to create a coalition against him, which included Athens, but it has achieved nothing.
(Image will be uploaded soon)
The 10-year "battle for Amphipolis" with Athens showed that, despite their naval power, the Athenians were unable to harm Macedonia's continental and military dominance, or even to save their own allies from Philip's attacks. Meanwhile, he went far into Thrace twice. And in the south, a split Thessaly provided him with a way into Greece. Central Greece was immersed in the Sacred War to free Delphi from the Phocians' occupation, allowing Philip to act as an ally of Thebes and the Thessalian League of city states.
In the field, his only major defeat was in Thessaly in 353, owing to overconfidence and a lack of reconnaissance. He retrieved it the following year with a brilliant victory, compelling the Athenians to hold Thermopylae and block his path south.
(Image will be uploaded soon)
Philip II of Macedon
Although he is best known as Alexander the Great's father, Philip II of Macedon (reigned 359 BCE - 336 BCE) was a competent king and military commander in his own right, preparing the ground for his son's triumph over Darius III and conquest of Persia. Philip inherited a poor, backward kingdom with an ineffective, undisciplined army, which he turned into a formidable, effective military force capable of subduing the areas surrounding Macedonia as well as most of Greece.
(Image will be uploaded soon)
Fig: In the late 1970s, claimed to have found this tomb of Philip of Macedon in Virginia, Greece, and decided that it was the grave of Philip II of Macedon. According to new evidence, his remains were laid in a nearby tomb (which is called the tomb of Philip of Macedon).
To keep his empire safe, he used bribery, warfare, and threats. However, history would have never heard of Alexander if it hadn't been for his vision and determination.
(Image will be uploaded soon)
How did Philip of Macedon Unify Greece?
Philip defeated two of the three major Greek-speaking powers: Thebes and Athens. He united several other Greek / Hellenic nations, like Sparta, who were often at the mercy of the major three. Thessaly, Macedonia's neighbor to the south, for example, was a close ally. As long-time maritime competitors to Athens, Corinth benefited greatly from Phillips' rise to power, while the latter was reduced as a power.
Being in league with Phillip increased their prosperity and status. It's also worth noting that Phillip was a member of the Argead dynasty, who ruled Macedon from around 700 to 310 BC. The name Argeads comes from the ancient Greek city of Argos in the Peloponnese region of southern Greece.
Did You Know?
FAQs on Philip of Macedon Unifies Greece
1. Who was Philip II of Macedon?
Philip II was the king of Macedon from 359–336 BCE, and the father of Alexander the Great. He is historically significant for transforming Macedon into a dominant military power and for accomplishing what the Greek city-states could not: unifying Greece under a single leader. His military and diplomatic strategies created the foundation for his son's later conquests of the Persian Empire.
2. How did Philip II unify the Greek city-states?
Philip II unified Greece through a masterful combination of military force, strategic diplomacy, and political organisation. His key methods included:
- Military Victories: His reformed Macedonian army secured decisive victories, most notably at the Battle of Chaeronea in 338 BCE against the combined forces of Athens and Thebes.
- Diplomacy and Alliances: He frequently used strategic marriages, bribery, and promises of support to create pro-Macedonian factions within the city-states, weakening them from the inside.
- The League of Corinth: After his military success, he established this federation to enforce a common peace and position himself as the hegemon (leader) of a unified Greece, effectively ending their internal conflicts and directing their focus outward.
3. What was the League of Corinth and what was its primary purpose?
The League of Corinth, established by Philip II in 337 BCE, was a federation of all major Greek city-states except for Sparta. Its official purpose was to maintain a common peace (koinē eirēnē) and security in Greece. However, its strategic purpose was to legitimise Macedonian dominance and to create a unified Pan-Hellenic army under Philip's command for a planned invasion of the Persian Empire.
4. What were the key military innovations that made Philip's army so effective?
Philip II's military success was built on several groundbreaking reforms. He introduced the Macedonian phalanx, where infantry soldiers were armed with an extremely long spear called the sarissa. This gave them a significant reach advantage over traditional hoplites. He also perfected combined arms tactics, coordinating his powerful infantry with elite cavalry units, known as the Companion Cavalry, to flank and shatter enemy formations. Finally, he greatly advanced siege warfare technology, allowing him to capture heavily fortified cities.
5. Why were powerful city-states like Athens and Thebes unable to stop Philip's rise?
The Greek city-states failed to stop Philip of Macedon for several critical reasons. Decades of internal conflict, especially the devastating Peloponnesian War, had severely weakened their military strength and economies. Deep-seated rivalries and political disunity prevented them from forming a lasting, effective alliance against the Macedonian threat. Many Greek leaders also underestimated Philip, viewing Macedonians as semi-barbaric and failing to recognise the sophistication of his military and diplomatic strategies until it was too late.
6. What were Philip II's ultimate goals after unifying Greece?
Philip's ambitions extended far beyond simply controlling Greece. His primary goal after unification was to lead the combined Greco-Macedonian forces in a massive invasion of the Achaemenid (Persian) Empire. This campaign was framed as a pan-Hellenic war of revenge for the Persian invasions of Greece a century earlier. It also served the practical purposes of securing immense wealth, new lands, and eternal glory for himself and Macedon.
7. How did Philip II's assassination in 336 BCE affect his plans for conquest?
Philip II's assassination was a pivotal moment but did not end his grand project. It created a brief power vacuum, prompting some Greek states to rebel. However, his son and heir, Alexander the Great, quickly and ruthlessly crushed these revolts. Alexander then inherited his father's supreme army, his unified Greek league, and the meticulously planned invasion of Persia. In effect, Philip's death passed the torch to a successor who would execute the plan on an even grander scale than Philip might have imagined, forever changing the map of the ancient world.



































