This curve is used to determine the possible projections of cost and output for the long term. While a short-term curve does exist, the factors that go into determining a short-term curve are a mixture of fixed inputs and variable inputs. However, given the sheer unpredictability of the future, the long-run average cost curve is mostly constructed using variable inputs. The long-run average total cost curve is used to determine productivity and cost in the long run.
Derivation of Long-run Average Cost Curve
To understand the reasoning behind the derivation of a long-run average cost curve, it is preferable to start with three short-run average cost curves.
[Image will be Uploaded Soon]
As the term suggests, short term average cost curves can be used for any firm in the short run. The firm can modify the increase or decrease in output and cost by changing the variable inputs appropriately. However, planning for the long run involves a little more creativity and understanding.
After closely examining each SAC (also referred to as plants, there may be more than 3 for a single firm), the firm will need to determine the most optimal curve to maximize production and minimize cost. To this end, the firm will need to choose the most optimal SAC, which will then be projected into the long term. While one SAC might give the firm the required results, another SAC might give them greater returns. This is why it is essential to consider multiple variables and create multiple SACs to determine the best cost vs output scenario. SACs are the key to how to find the long-run average total cost curve.
Long Run Average Cost Curve Definition
To define the long-run average cost curve, consider an array of SACs that will vary only slightly to form a specific gradation. In such a case, the curve that is formed by connecting the lowest points of each SAC will form the long-run average cost curve. Given that this long-run curve is drawn tangentially to all the increasingly graded SAC, it showcases the points with the lowest cost and thus gives the firm an idea of what SAC it can use to achieve the desired output.
[Image will be Uploaded Soon]
So if any point on the LAC is what the goal the firm wishes to reach, then the firm will employ the corresponding SAC that is closest to the point along the tangent. Multiple SACs along the tangent will be able to sustain a specific output, but only one will be able to do it at the lowest cost. Using the wrong SAC or improperly grading the curve will result in increased cost for the same output or (in cases of a faulty LAC) result in a decreased output for the expected cost.
The long-run average cost curve is used to plan the desired output for a specific cost, granting it the title of the planning curve. This is because a firm can plan their cost and productivity by choosing the right plant along the long-run average cost curve.
Q1. Why is the Long-run Average Cost Curve U-shaped?
Answer: The Long-run average cost curves are often of a U shape. There is a clear drop, a short stagnation, and the eventual rise of the LAC which can be due to the state of technology and of the economy itself. In a perfect world, the same process can be employed over and over again. However, the reality is quite different, and thus the modern long-run average cost curve is more of an L shape implying that the output can be kept at a constant value with minimum cost, thanks to ground-breaking technology.
Q2. How is the Long-run Average Cost Curve Used in Projections?
Answer: As mentioned previously, the long-run average cost curve is made by tangentially linking multiple SAC whose variables are changed incrementally but only slightly to form reference points. While the Long-run average cost curve is used as a reference in long term planning. It is more of a tool to determine which SAC would be ideal for a scenario. The long-run average cost curve also allows firms to take into account both internal and external economies.
Q3. How Often is the Long-run Average Cost Curve Used?
Answer: The long-run average cost curve is used in most meetings where all operations of a firm are being considered and are in the process of being optimized for low cost and high returns. While the traditional shape of the Long-run cost curve is U shape, the modern curve is more favourable to the L shape because technology allows for better optimization of new and old resources. The L shape of the long-run average cost curve implies that after a certain point, the cost can remain virtually the same. At the same time, the output continues to increase because of improved technology specific to that industry.