Question

Which type of Constitution is easy to amend?
A. Rigid Constitution
B. Unitary Constitution
C. Flexible Constitution
D. Federal Constitution

Answer 1

Hint: A Constitutional Amendment is an adjustment of the constitution of a commonwealth, association, or another kind of substance. The Constitution which is easy to amend is of the nature opposite of the rigid constitution.
- An example of such a Constitution is the British Constitution.

Complete answer:
-The structure of the constitution can be chosen as the premise of alterations.
Let us review the options and discuss the answer.
Option A. If the amendment is troublesome or not at all possible, it is known as the Rigid Constitution. Thus, it is an incorrect option.
Option B. Unitary Constitution: - the entire authority is with a single entity which is the central government. There is no provision for amendments. Thus, it is an incorrect option.
Option C: - In the event that the revision is simple, it is called Flexible Constitution. It is viewed as unwritten or unmodified. It is handily corrected without the utilization of an uncommon methodology. In a Flexible Constitution, the Parliament can modify the constitution by passing a law. Thus, it is the correct option.
Option D. Federal Constitution: - A federal-state gets its reality from the constitution. The constitution is viewed as the preeminent rule that everyone must follow and nobody is over the constitution. Each federal state has a composed and rigid constitution. It is different to amend. Thus, it is an incorrect option.

Additional Information
-Article 368 of the Indian Constitution makes reference to two kinds of revisions to the Indian Constitution. One kind of change is by an extraordinarily larger part of the Parliament (Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha) and the second sort of alteration is by a special majority of the Parliament with the approval by half of the all-out states.

Therefore, the correct answer is Option C.

Note:The current position is that the Parliament under Article 368 can change any piece of the Constitution including the Fundamental Rights however without influencing the 'essential structure' of the Constitution. Nonetheless, the Supreme Court is yet to characterize or explain what establishes the 'fundamental structure' of the Constitution.