
To find $\underset{x\to {{0}^{-}}}{\mathop{\lim }}\,{{(\ln (\{x\}+|[x]|))}^{\{x\}}}$, where {} denotes fractional part function and [] denotes greatest integer function, is?
(a) 0
(b) 1
(c) ln 2
(d) ln $\dfrac{1}{2}$
Answer
619.5k+ views
Hint: To solve the above problem, concepts of greatest integer function, fractional part function and basics of limits are required. Greatest integer function of any number x is the nearest integer to x which is less than or equal to x. Fractional part function basically gives the decimal part of any number (for 1.6, {1.6} = 0.6). We will use these properties to simplify the above function given inside the limits. In addition, we will also make use of the property, [x] = x – {x}.
Complete step by step answer:
Before beginning the problem, we try to understand the basic concepts which will be required to solve the problem. The greatest integer function ([x]) basically gives the nearest integer to x which is less than or equal to x. Thus, for example, for 1.9, we have [1.9] =1.
Further, [-1.2] = -2 and so on. In the case of the fractional part, this function gives the decimal part of any number. For example, in case of 1.6, {1.6} = 0.6). Now, we come back to the problem in hand, we have,
=$\underset{x\to {{0}^{-}}}{\mathop{\lim }}\,{{(\ln (\{x\}+|[x]|))}^{\{x\}}}$
Now, if x$\to {{0}^{-}}$, we can have h (for h>0) , x$\to $-h. Thus, we have
= $\underset{h\to 0}{\mathop{\lim }}\,{{(\ln (\{-h\}+|[-h]|))}^{\{-h\}}}$
Since, h is close to zero and positive quantity, -h would be negative and close to zero (say
-0.001). Thus, [-h] = -1. Thus, substituting above,
= $\underset{h\to 0}{\mathop{\lim }}\,{{(\ln (\{-h\}+|-1|))}^{\{-h\}}}$
Now, |-1| = 1 (since, the absolute function of any number is the positive part of that number.
That is, |-2| =2 and so on.)
= $\underset{h\to 0}{\mathop{\lim }}\,{{(\ln (\{-h\}+1))}^{\{-h\}}}$
Now, using, [h]=h-{h}, we have,
= $\underset{h\to 0}{\mathop{\lim }}\,{{(\ln ((-h-[-h])+1))}^{(-h-[-h])}}$
Since, [-h] = -1, we have,
= $\underset{h\to 0}{\mathop{\lim }}\,{{(\ln ((-h-(-1))+1))}^{(-h-(-1))}}$
= $\underset{h\to 0}{\mathop{\lim }}\,{{(\ln ((-h+1)+1))}^{(-h+1)}}$
= $\underset{h\to 0}{\mathop{\lim }}\,{{(\ln (2-h))}^{(-h+1)}}$
Now, we can put h=0 in this above expression, we get,
= ln (2)
Hence, the correct answer is (c) ln (2).
Note: While solving questions related to one sided limits ($x\to {{0}^{+}}$ or $x\to {{0}^{-}}$), we substitute h in place of x (for $x\to {{0}^{+}}$) and (-h) [for $x\to {{0}^{-}}$] and then solve for h$\to $0. We try to solve the function inside the limits till we can successfully substitute h=0 (without getting an indeterminate form).
Complete step by step answer:
Before beginning the problem, we try to understand the basic concepts which will be required to solve the problem. The greatest integer function ([x]) basically gives the nearest integer to x which is less than or equal to x. Thus, for example, for 1.9, we have [1.9] =1.
Further, [-1.2] = -2 and so on. In the case of the fractional part, this function gives the decimal part of any number. For example, in case of 1.6, {1.6} = 0.6). Now, we come back to the problem in hand, we have,
=$\underset{x\to {{0}^{-}}}{\mathop{\lim }}\,{{(\ln (\{x\}+|[x]|))}^{\{x\}}}$
Now, if x$\to {{0}^{-}}$, we can have h (for h>0) , x$\to $-h. Thus, we have
= $\underset{h\to 0}{\mathop{\lim }}\,{{(\ln (\{-h\}+|[-h]|))}^{\{-h\}}}$
Since, h is close to zero and positive quantity, -h would be negative and close to zero (say
-0.001). Thus, [-h] = -1. Thus, substituting above,
= $\underset{h\to 0}{\mathop{\lim }}\,{{(\ln (\{-h\}+|-1|))}^{\{-h\}}}$
Now, |-1| = 1 (since, the absolute function of any number is the positive part of that number.
That is, |-2| =2 and so on.)
= $\underset{h\to 0}{\mathop{\lim }}\,{{(\ln (\{-h\}+1))}^{\{-h\}}}$
Now, using, [h]=h-{h}, we have,
= $\underset{h\to 0}{\mathop{\lim }}\,{{(\ln ((-h-[-h])+1))}^{(-h-[-h])}}$
Since, [-h] = -1, we have,
= $\underset{h\to 0}{\mathop{\lim }}\,{{(\ln ((-h-(-1))+1))}^{(-h-(-1))}}$
= $\underset{h\to 0}{\mathop{\lim }}\,{{(\ln ((-h+1)+1))}^{(-h+1)}}$
= $\underset{h\to 0}{\mathop{\lim }}\,{{(\ln (2-h))}^{(-h+1)}}$
Now, we can put h=0 in this above expression, we get,
= ln (2)
Hence, the correct answer is (c) ln (2).
Note: While solving questions related to one sided limits ($x\to {{0}^{+}}$ or $x\to {{0}^{-}}$), we substitute h in place of x (for $x\to {{0}^{+}}$) and (-h) [for $x\to {{0}^{-}}$] and then solve for h$\to $0. We try to solve the function inside the limits till we can successfully substitute h=0 (without getting an indeterminate form).
Recently Updated Pages
Master Class 10 Computer Science: Engaging Questions & Answers for Success

Master Class 10 General Knowledge: Engaging Questions & Answers for Success

Master Class 10 English: Engaging Questions & Answers for Success

Master Class 10 Social Science: Engaging Questions & Answers for Success

Master Class 10 Maths: Engaging Questions & Answers for Success

Master Class 10 Science: Engaging Questions & Answers for Success

Trending doubts
What is the median of the first 10 natural numbers class 10 maths CBSE

Which women's tennis player has 24 Grand Slam singles titles?

Who is the Brand Ambassador of Incredible India?

Why is there a time difference of about 5 hours between class 10 social science CBSE

Write a letter to the principal requesting him to grant class 10 english CBSE

A moving boat is observed from the top of a 150 m high class 10 maths CBSE

