
The compounds $[\text{Co(S}{{\text{O}}_{4}}){{(\text{N}{{\text{H}}_{3}})}_{5}}]\text{Br}$ and $[\text{Co(S}{{\text{O}}_{4}}){{(\text{N}{{\text{H}}_{3}})}_{5}}]\text{Cl}$ represent:
(A) linkage isomerism
(B) ionisation isomerism
(C) coordination isomerism
(D) no isomerism
Answer
578.1k+ views
Hint: Recall the types of isomerism given in the chapter Coordination compounds. Try to understand the types of isomerism given in the options with an example so as to check whether the compound given in question is that type of isomer or not. If the pair of complex compounds are not any type of isomers then there is no isomerism between the two compounds.
Complete step by step answer:
Chemical compounds that consist of an array of anions or neutral molecules that are bound to a central atom via coordinate covalent bonds are called coordination compounds. Coordination compounds are also referred to as coordination complexes.
The neutral molecules or ions that are bound to the central atom are referred to as ligands or complexing agents. They act as Lewis base and donate electron pairs to transition metal ions, thus a dative bond is formed between ligands and the transition metal ion. Hence these compounds are coordination complexes.
Linkage isomerism is the existence of coordination compounds that have the same composition but differ in their connectivity with the central metal atom. Example:
- Thiocyanate ($SC{{N}^{-}}$) and isothiocyanate ($NC{{S}^{-}}$),
- Selenocyanate ($SeC{{N}^{-}}$) and iso selenocyanate ($NCS{{e}^{-}}$).
Ionization isomers have the same composition and formula but give different ions upon dissociation. Example:
- \[[Co{{(N{{H}_{3}})}_{5}}Br]S{{O}_{4}}\]and \[[Co{{(N{{H}_{3}})}_{5}}S{{O}_{4}}]Br\]
Coordination isomerism is a form of structural isomerism in which the composition of complex ion is different in the pair of isomers. In a coordination isomer the total ratio of ligand to metal remains the same, but the ligands attached to a specific metal ion are different. Example:
- ${{[Zn{{(N{{H}_{3}})}_{4}}]}^{+2}}{{[CuC{{l}_{4}}]}^{-2}}$ and ${{[Cu{{(N{{H}_{3}})}_{4}}]}^{+2}}{{[ZnC{{l}_{4}}]}^{-2}}$.
From the above explanation we see that the given pair of complex compounds do not match with any of them examples mentioned. Hence there is no isomerism between the two complex compounds.
So, the correct answer is “Option D”.
Note: Like organic compounds, transition metal complexes show geometrical and optical isomers. For e.g. the below pair of complexes are in cis-trans form:
The complex ${{[Co{{(en)}_{3}}]}^{+3}}$ shows optical isomerism:
Complete step by step answer:
Chemical compounds that consist of an array of anions or neutral molecules that are bound to a central atom via coordinate covalent bonds are called coordination compounds. Coordination compounds are also referred to as coordination complexes.
The neutral molecules or ions that are bound to the central atom are referred to as ligands or complexing agents. They act as Lewis base and donate electron pairs to transition metal ions, thus a dative bond is formed between ligands and the transition metal ion. Hence these compounds are coordination complexes.
Linkage isomerism is the existence of coordination compounds that have the same composition but differ in their connectivity with the central metal atom. Example:
- Thiocyanate ($SC{{N}^{-}}$) and isothiocyanate ($NC{{S}^{-}}$),
- Selenocyanate ($SeC{{N}^{-}}$) and iso selenocyanate ($NCS{{e}^{-}}$).
Ionization isomers have the same composition and formula but give different ions upon dissociation. Example:
- \[[Co{{(N{{H}_{3}})}_{5}}Br]S{{O}_{4}}\]and \[[Co{{(N{{H}_{3}})}_{5}}S{{O}_{4}}]Br\]
Coordination isomerism is a form of structural isomerism in which the composition of complex ion is different in the pair of isomers. In a coordination isomer the total ratio of ligand to metal remains the same, but the ligands attached to a specific metal ion are different. Example:
- ${{[Zn{{(N{{H}_{3}})}_{4}}]}^{+2}}{{[CuC{{l}_{4}}]}^{-2}}$ and ${{[Cu{{(N{{H}_{3}})}_{4}}]}^{+2}}{{[ZnC{{l}_{4}}]}^{-2}}$.
From the above explanation we see that the given pair of complex compounds do not match with any of them examples mentioned. Hence there is no isomerism between the two complex compounds.
So, the correct answer is “Option D”.
Note: Like organic compounds, transition metal complexes show geometrical and optical isomers. For e.g. the below pair of complexes are in cis-trans form:
The complex ${{[Co{{(en)}_{3}}]}^{+3}}$ shows optical isomerism:
Recently Updated Pages
Why are manures considered better than fertilizers class 11 biology CBSE

Find the coordinates of the midpoint of the line segment class 11 maths CBSE

Distinguish between static friction limiting friction class 11 physics CBSE

The Chairman of the constituent Assembly was A Jawaharlal class 11 social science CBSE

The first National Commission on Labour NCL submitted class 11 social science CBSE

Number of all subshell of n + l 7 is A 4 B 5 C 6 D class 11 chemistry CBSE

Trending doubts
Differentiate between an exothermic and an endothermic class 11 chemistry CBSE

10 examples of friction in our daily life

One Metric ton is equal to kg A 10000 B 1000 C 100 class 11 physics CBSE

Difference Between Prokaryotic Cells and Eukaryotic Cells

1 Quintal is equal to a 110 kg b 10 kg c 100kg d 1000 class 11 physics CBSE

State the laws of reflection of light

