Question

The post of common adjudicator is now and again joined with the employment of Chief legal justice and can attempt cases culpable with Imprisonment for a very long time and fine?
1) True
2) False

Answer 1

Hint:
1. A Judge is a person on whom the decision taking power is vested in the court of law.
2. He might act either alone or with a group of judges. A magistrate is someone who is prior to the judge. In civil cases, he has authority in administering law enforcement.

Complete answer:
a) A Civil Judge is called a Sessions Judge when dealing criminal matters. While a Chief Judicial Magistrate is a position appropriately for a criminal adjudicator himself. Now and then in certain spots, because of absence of appropriate organization and appropriately authorized number of required adjudicators/officers in a locale, the Civil Judge is likewise given charge of the CJM and the other way around.
b) In particular comes their powers and forces. In CJM, just issues having a sentence up to greatest detainment for a very long time can be heard and given decisions. Same goes for Chief Metropolitan Magistrate. Yet, to the extent respected about the Assistant Sessions Judge, he may hear and choose the issues which have detainment up to 10 years yet can't pass a capital punishment.)
Thus,
From the above points we can say that yes, Civil judges can try cases punishable with imprisonment for seven years.

Thus, the given statement is True.

Note:
1) Jurisdiction for the Sessions Judge or an Additional Sessions Judge is more than that of these Magistrates or even an Assistant Sessions Judge.
2) Now, the Sessions Judge may hear and give even a death penalty in cases having such punishment described but only after the consent of their High Court.