Courses
Courses for Kids
Free study material
Offline Centres
More
Store Icon
Store
seo-qna
SearchIcon
banner

The equivalent capacitance across A and B is: (all capacitances are in $\mu F$ )
seo images

$\begin{align}
  & (A)\dfrac{28}{3}\mu F \\
 & (B)\dfrac{15}{2}\mu F \\
 & (C)15\mu F \\
 & (D)\text{None of these} \\
\end{align}$

Answer
VerifiedVerified
518.4k+ views
Hint: We will first break down the above circuits into much smaller and easier to understand equivalent capacitance systems. Once, we do that we will use the formula for net capacitance in series and parallel to solve each branch step by step. And, then we can finally get the required capacitance between the two points A and B.

Complete step-by-step answer:
We will first solve the branches that are easy to solve and then simplify our circuit.
In the first step we will work on the dashed section shown in the figure below:
seo images

The $23\mu F$ and $12\mu F$capacitors are connected in parallel so their resultant could be written as $35\mu F$ . Also, when going through point B the two $1\mu F$ capacitors are connected in parallel, so their resultant will be $2\mu F$ .
Thus, our new circuit will be reconstructed as follows:
seo images

Now, this circuit looks like a wheatstone bridge. So, we will check for the condition of a balanced wheatstone bridge.
In the left-hand side of the divider capacitance, we have:
$\begin{align}
  & \Rightarrow L.H.S.=\dfrac{35}{10} \\
 & \therefore L.H.S.=3.5 \\
\end{align}$
And in the right-hand side of the divider capacitance, we have:
$\begin{align}
  & \Rightarrow R.H.S.=\dfrac{7}{2} \\
 & \therefore R.H.S.=3.5 \\
\end{align}$
This implies that the ratio of capacitance is equal at both the sides of the divider. Thus, it is a perfectly balanced wheatstone bridge. So the divider capacitor will act as an open circuit. Thus our new circuit becomes:
                                                
seo images

The above circuit is a simple circuit having series and parallel capacitors.
In the top branch of the circuit, equivalent capacitance (say${{C}_{1}}$ ) is equal to:
$\begin{align}
  & \Rightarrow {{C}_{1}}=\dfrac{35\times 7}{35+7}\mu F \\
 & \therefore {{C}_{1}}=\dfrac{35}{6}\mu F \\
\end{align}$
And, in the bottom branch of the circuit, equivalent capacitance (say${{C}_{2}}$) is equal to:
$\begin{align}
  & \Rightarrow {{C}_{2}}=\dfrac{10\times 2}{10+2}\mu F \\
 & \therefore {{C}_{2}}=\dfrac{10}{6}\mu F \\
\end{align}$
Now, the net capacitance between A and B could be given by the summation of ${{C}_{1}}$and ${{C}_{2}}$as they are connected in parallel. This circuit is represented below:
                                
seo images

Thus, the equivalent capacitance between A and B is:
$\begin{align}
  & \Rightarrow {{C}_{AB}}=\dfrac{35}{6}+\dfrac{10}{6} \\
 & \Rightarrow {{C}_{AB}}=\dfrac{45}{6}\mu F \\
 & \therefore {{C}_{AB}}=\dfrac{15}{2}\mu F \\
\end{align}$
Hence, the equivalent capacitance across A and B is $\dfrac{15}{2}\mu F$.

So, the correct answer is “Option B”.

Note: In complex circuit problems like these, we should break the circuit into a smaller and easier to understand circuit at every step of the process. Also, we should keep looking for special conditions like Wheatstone bridge, as they make our problems significantly easier to solve and less complex.