Ratio of intensities in consecutive maxima in a diffraction pattern due to a single slit is
A. $ 1:2:3 $
B. $ 1:4:9 $
C. $ 1:\dfrac{2}{{{\pi ^2}}}:\dfrac{3}{{{\pi ^2}}} $
D. $ 1:\dfrac{4}{{9{\pi ^2}}}:\dfrac{4}{{25{\pi ^2}}} $
Answer
557.1k+ views
Hint: In this question, we need to find the ratio of intensities in consecutive maxima in a single slit diffraction pattern. The general condition for Constructive Interference in a single slit diffraction pattern is $ a sin \theta = \left( {\dfrac{{2n + 1}}{2}} \right)\lambda $ and intensity of single slit diffraction pattern is given by $ I = {I_0}{\left[ {\dfrac{{ sin \varphi /2}}{{\varphi /2}}} \right]^2} $ . Using this, we can find the ratio of intensities.
For constructive interference, $ a sin \theta = \left( {\dfrac{{2n + 1}}{2}} \right)\lambda $
Where $ a $ is the width of the slit
$ \lambda $ is the wavelength of the incident light
$ I = {I_0}{\left[ {\dfrac{{ sin \varphi /2}}{{\varphi /2}}} \right]^2} $
Where $ {I_0} $ is the intensity at $ \theta = {0^ \circ } $.
Complete step by step solution:
The general condition for Constructive Interference or $ {\text{nth}} $ maxima in a single slit diffraction $ a sin \theta = \left( {\dfrac{{2n + 1}}{2}} \right)\lambda $
Intensity at an angle $ \theta $ of a single slit diffraction pattern is given by $ I = {I_0}{\left[ {\dfrac{{ sin \varphi /2}}{{\varphi /2}}} \right]^2} - - - - - - - \left( 1 \right) $
Here, $ \dfrac{\varphi }{2} = \dfrac{{\pi a sin \theta }}{\lambda } $
But we know, $ \dfrac{{a sin \theta }}{\lambda } = \left( {\dfrac{{2n + 1}}{2}} \right) $
Substituting this in the above equation we get,
Hence, $ \dfrac{\varphi }{2} = \left( {\dfrac{{2n + 1}}{2}} \right)\pi $
Replacing this in equation $ \left( 1 \right) $ we get,
$ I = {I_0}{\left[ {\dfrac{{ sin \left( {\dfrac{{2n + 1}}{2}} \right)\pi }}{{\left( {\dfrac{{2n + 1}}{2}} \right)\pi }}} \right]^2} $
But $ {\left[ { sin \left( {\dfrac{{2n + 1}}{2}} \right)\pi } \right]^2} = 1 $
As $ \left( {\dfrac{{2n + 1}}{2}} \right)\pi $ is an integral multiple of $ \dfrac{\pi }{2} $
$ I = \dfrac{{{I_0}}}{{{{\left[ {\left( {\dfrac{{2n + 1}}{2}} \right)\pi } \right]}^2}}} $
For consecutive maxima take the values of $ n = 1,2 $
Let the intensities of consecutive maximas be $ {I_1},{I_2} $
Intensity of central maxima is $ {I_0} $
Intensity at the first maxima is $ {I_1} = \dfrac{{{I_0}}}{{{{\left[ {\left( {\dfrac{3}{2}} \right)\pi } \right]}^2}}} $
Intensity at the second maxima is $ {I_2} = \dfrac{{{I_0}}}{{{{\left[ {\left( {\dfrac{5}{2}} \right)\pi } \right]}^2}}} - $
The ratio of consecutive maximas is given by $ {I_0}:{I_1}:{I_2} $
$ {I_0}:{I_1}:{I_2} = {I_0}:\dfrac{{{I_0}}}{{{{\left[ {\left( {\dfrac{3}{2}} \right)\pi } \right]}^2}}}:\dfrac{{{I_0}}}{{{{\left[ {\left( {\dfrac{5}{2}} \right)\pi } \right]}^2}}} $
On solving we get,
$ \Rightarrow {I_0}:{I_1}:{I_2} = 1:\dfrac{4}{{9{\pi ^2}}}:\dfrac{4}{{25{\pi ^2}}} $
Thus, ratio of Intensities of the consecutive maxima is $ 1:\dfrac{4}{{9{\pi ^2}}}:\dfrac{4}{{25{\pi ^2}}} $
Hence, the correct option is option D.
Note:
That $ sin \theta = 0 $ , corresponds to the central maxima while $ \dfrac{{\pi a sin \theta }}{\lambda } = \pi $ corresponds to the first minima. The general condition for destructive interference is $ a sin \theta = n\lambda $ . This equation gives the values of $ \theta $ for which the diffraction pattern has zero light intensity—that is, when a dark fringe is formed. However, it tells us nothing about the variation in light intensity along the screen.
For constructive interference, $ a sin \theta = \left( {\dfrac{{2n + 1}}{2}} \right)\lambda $
Where $ a $ is the width of the slit
$ \lambda $ is the wavelength of the incident light
$ I = {I_0}{\left[ {\dfrac{{ sin \varphi /2}}{{\varphi /2}}} \right]^2} $
Where $ {I_0} $ is the intensity at $ \theta = {0^ \circ } $.
Complete step by step solution:
The general condition for Constructive Interference or $ {\text{nth}} $ maxima in a single slit diffraction $ a sin \theta = \left( {\dfrac{{2n + 1}}{2}} \right)\lambda $
Intensity at an angle $ \theta $ of a single slit diffraction pattern is given by $ I = {I_0}{\left[ {\dfrac{{ sin \varphi /2}}{{\varphi /2}}} \right]^2} - - - - - - - \left( 1 \right) $
Here, $ \dfrac{\varphi }{2} = \dfrac{{\pi a sin \theta }}{\lambda } $
But we know, $ \dfrac{{a sin \theta }}{\lambda } = \left( {\dfrac{{2n + 1}}{2}} \right) $
Substituting this in the above equation we get,
Hence, $ \dfrac{\varphi }{2} = \left( {\dfrac{{2n + 1}}{2}} \right)\pi $
Replacing this in equation $ \left( 1 \right) $ we get,
$ I = {I_0}{\left[ {\dfrac{{ sin \left( {\dfrac{{2n + 1}}{2}} \right)\pi }}{{\left( {\dfrac{{2n + 1}}{2}} \right)\pi }}} \right]^2} $
But $ {\left[ { sin \left( {\dfrac{{2n + 1}}{2}} \right)\pi } \right]^2} = 1 $
As $ \left( {\dfrac{{2n + 1}}{2}} \right)\pi $ is an integral multiple of $ \dfrac{\pi }{2} $
$ I = \dfrac{{{I_0}}}{{{{\left[ {\left( {\dfrac{{2n + 1}}{2}} \right)\pi } \right]}^2}}} $
For consecutive maxima take the values of $ n = 1,2 $
Let the intensities of consecutive maximas be $ {I_1},{I_2} $
Intensity of central maxima is $ {I_0} $
Intensity at the first maxima is $ {I_1} = \dfrac{{{I_0}}}{{{{\left[ {\left( {\dfrac{3}{2}} \right)\pi } \right]}^2}}} $
Intensity at the second maxima is $ {I_2} = \dfrac{{{I_0}}}{{{{\left[ {\left( {\dfrac{5}{2}} \right)\pi } \right]}^2}}} - $
The ratio of consecutive maximas is given by $ {I_0}:{I_1}:{I_2} $
$ {I_0}:{I_1}:{I_2} = {I_0}:\dfrac{{{I_0}}}{{{{\left[ {\left( {\dfrac{3}{2}} \right)\pi } \right]}^2}}}:\dfrac{{{I_0}}}{{{{\left[ {\left( {\dfrac{5}{2}} \right)\pi } \right]}^2}}} $
On solving we get,
$ \Rightarrow {I_0}:{I_1}:{I_2} = 1:\dfrac{4}{{9{\pi ^2}}}:\dfrac{4}{{25{\pi ^2}}} $
Thus, ratio of Intensities of the consecutive maxima is $ 1:\dfrac{4}{{9{\pi ^2}}}:\dfrac{4}{{25{\pi ^2}}} $
Hence, the correct option is option D.
Note:
That $ sin \theta = 0 $ , corresponds to the central maxima while $ \dfrac{{\pi a sin \theta }}{\lambda } = \pi $ corresponds to the first minima. The general condition for destructive interference is $ a sin \theta = n\lambda $ . This equation gives the values of $ \theta $ for which the diffraction pattern has zero light intensity—that is, when a dark fringe is formed. However, it tells us nothing about the variation in light intensity along the screen.
Recently Updated Pages
Master Class 12 Physics: Engaging Questions & Answers for Success

Master Class 12 Social Science: Engaging Questions & Answers for Success

Master Class 12 English: Engaging Questions & Answers for Success

Master Class 12 Maths: Engaging Questions & Answers for Success

Master Class 12 Business Studies: Engaging Questions & Answers for Success

Master Class 12 Chemistry: Engaging Questions & Answers for Success

Trending doubts
Draw a labelled sketch of the human eye class 12 physics CBSE

Which are the Top 10 Largest Countries of the World?

Draw ray diagrams each showing i myopic eye and ii class 12 physics CBSE

Which is the correct genotypic ratio of mendel dihybrid class 12 biology CBSE

Give 10 examples of unisexual and bisexual flowers

What is the Full Form of PVC, PET, HDPE, LDPE, PP and PS ?

