Ratio of intensities in consecutive maxima in a diffraction pattern due to a single slit is
A. $ 1:2:3 $
B. $ 1:4:9 $
C. $ 1:\dfrac{2}{{{\pi ^2}}}:\dfrac{3}{{{\pi ^2}}} $
D. $ 1:\dfrac{4}{{9{\pi ^2}}}:\dfrac{4}{{25{\pi ^2}}} $
Answer
516k+ views
Hint: In this question, we need to find the ratio of intensities in consecutive maxima in a single slit diffraction pattern. The general condition for Constructive Interference in a single slit diffraction pattern is $ a sin \theta = \left( {\dfrac{{2n + 1}}{2}} \right)\lambda $ and intensity of single slit diffraction pattern is given by $ I = {I_0}{\left[ {\dfrac{{ sin \varphi /2}}{{\varphi /2}}} \right]^2} $ . Using this, we can find the ratio of intensities.
For constructive interference, $ a sin \theta = \left( {\dfrac{{2n + 1}}{2}} \right)\lambda $
Where $ a $ is the width of the slit
$ \lambda $ is the wavelength of the incident light
$ I = {I_0}{\left[ {\dfrac{{ sin \varphi /2}}{{\varphi /2}}} \right]^2} $
Where $ {I_0} $ is the intensity at $ \theta = {0^ \circ } $.
Complete step by step solution:
The general condition for Constructive Interference or $ {\text{nth}} $ maxima in a single slit diffraction $ a sin \theta = \left( {\dfrac{{2n + 1}}{2}} \right)\lambda $
Intensity at an angle $ \theta $ of a single slit diffraction pattern is given by $ I = {I_0}{\left[ {\dfrac{{ sin \varphi /2}}{{\varphi /2}}} \right]^2} - - - - - - - \left( 1 \right) $
Here, $ \dfrac{\varphi }{2} = \dfrac{{\pi a sin \theta }}{\lambda } $
But we know, $ \dfrac{{a sin \theta }}{\lambda } = \left( {\dfrac{{2n + 1}}{2}} \right) $
Substituting this in the above equation we get,
Hence, $ \dfrac{\varphi }{2} = \left( {\dfrac{{2n + 1}}{2}} \right)\pi $
Replacing this in equation $ \left( 1 \right) $ we get,
$ I = {I_0}{\left[ {\dfrac{{ sin \left( {\dfrac{{2n + 1}}{2}} \right)\pi }}{{\left( {\dfrac{{2n + 1}}{2}} \right)\pi }}} \right]^2} $
But $ {\left[ { sin \left( {\dfrac{{2n + 1}}{2}} \right)\pi } \right]^2} = 1 $
As $ \left( {\dfrac{{2n + 1}}{2}} \right)\pi $ is an integral multiple of $ \dfrac{\pi }{2} $
$ I = \dfrac{{{I_0}}}{{{{\left[ {\left( {\dfrac{{2n + 1}}{2}} \right)\pi } \right]}^2}}} $
For consecutive maxima take the values of $ n = 1,2 $
Let the intensities of consecutive maximas be $ {I_1},{I_2} $
Intensity of central maxima is $ {I_0} $
Intensity at the first maxima is $ {I_1} = \dfrac{{{I_0}}}{{{{\left[ {\left( {\dfrac{3}{2}} \right)\pi } \right]}^2}}} $
Intensity at the second maxima is $ {I_2} = \dfrac{{{I_0}}}{{{{\left[ {\left( {\dfrac{5}{2}} \right)\pi } \right]}^2}}} - $
The ratio of consecutive maximas is given by $ {I_0}:{I_1}:{I_2} $
$ {I_0}:{I_1}:{I_2} = {I_0}:\dfrac{{{I_0}}}{{{{\left[ {\left( {\dfrac{3}{2}} \right)\pi } \right]}^2}}}:\dfrac{{{I_0}}}{{{{\left[ {\left( {\dfrac{5}{2}} \right)\pi } \right]}^2}}} $
On solving we get,
$ \Rightarrow {I_0}:{I_1}:{I_2} = 1:\dfrac{4}{{9{\pi ^2}}}:\dfrac{4}{{25{\pi ^2}}} $
Thus, ratio of Intensities of the consecutive maxima is $ 1:\dfrac{4}{{9{\pi ^2}}}:\dfrac{4}{{25{\pi ^2}}} $
Hence, the correct option is option D.
Note:
That $ sin \theta = 0 $ , corresponds to the central maxima while $ \dfrac{{\pi a sin \theta }}{\lambda } = \pi $ corresponds to the first minima. The general condition for destructive interference is $ a sin \theta = n\lambda $ . This equation gives the values of $ \theta $ for which the diffraction pattern has zero light intensity—that is, when a dark fringe is formed. However, it tells us nothing about the variation in light intensity along the screen.
For constructive interference, $ a sin \theta = \left( {\dfrac{{2n + 1}}{2}} \right)\lambda $
Where $ a $ is the width of the slit
$ \lambda $ is the wavelength of the incident light
$ I = {I_0}{\left[ {\dfrac{{ sin \varphi /2}}{{\varphi /2}}} \right]^2} $
Where $ {I_0} $ is the intensity at $ \theta = {0^ \circ } $.
Complete step by step solution:
The general condition for Constructive Interference or $ {\text{nth}} $ maxima in a single slit diffraction $ a sin \theta = \left( {\dfrac{{2n + 1}}{2}} \right)\lambda $
Intensity at an angle $ \theta $ of a single slit diffraction pattern is given by $ I = {I_0}{\left[ {\dfrac{{ sin \varphi /2}}{{\varphi /2}}} \right]^2} - - - - - - - \left( 1 \right) $
Here, $ \dfrac{\varphi }{2} = \dfrac{{\pi a sin \theta }}{\lambda } $
But we know, $ \dfrac{{a sin \theta }}{\lambda } = \left( {\dfrac{{2n + 1}}{2}} \right) $
Substituting this in the above equation we get,
Hence, $ \dfrac{\varphi }{2} = \left( {\dfrac{{2n + 1}}{2}} \right)\pi $
Replacing this in equation $ \left( 1 \right) $ we get,
$ I = {I_0}{\left[ {\dfrac{{ sin \left( {\dfrac{{2n + 1}}{2}} \right)\pi }}{{\left( {\dfrac{{2n + 1}}{2}} \right)\pi }}} \right]^2} $
But $ {\left[ { sin \left( {\dfrac{{2n + 1}}{2}} \right)\pi } \right]^2} = 1 $
As $ \left( {\dfrac{{2n + 1}}{2}} \right)\pi $ is an integral multiple of $ \dfrac{\pi }{2} $
$ I = \dfrac{{{I_0}}}{{{{\left[ {\left( {\dfrac{{2n + 1}}{2}} \right)\pi } \right]}^2}}} $
For consecutive maxima take the values of $ n = 1,2 $
Let the intensities of consecutive maximas be $ {I_1},{I_2} $
Intensity of central maxima is $ {I_0} $
Intensity at the first maxima is $ {I_1} = \dfrac{{{I_0}}}{{{{\left[ {\left( {\dfrac{3}{2}} \right)\pi } \right]}^2}}} $
Intensity at the second maxima is $ {I_2} = \dfrac{{{I_0}}}{{{{\left[ {\left( {\dfrac{5}{2}} \right)\pi } \right]}^2}}} - $
The ratio of consecutive maximas is given by $ {I_0}:{I_1}:{I_2} $
$ {I_0}:{I_1}:{I_2} = {I_0}:\dfrac{{{I_0}}}{{{{\left[ {\left( {\dfrac{3}{2}} \right)\pi } \right]}^2}}}:\dfrac{{{I_0}}}{{{{\left[ {\left( {\dfrac{5}{2}} \right)\pi } \right]}^2}}} $
On solving we get,
$ \Rightarrow {I_0}:{I_1}:{I_2} = 1:\dfrac{4}{{9{\pi ^2}}}:\dfrac{4}{{25{\pi ^2}}} $
Thus, ratio of Intensities of the consecutive maxima is $ 1:\dfrac{4}{{9{\pi ^2}}}:\dfrac{4}{{25{\pi ^2}}} $
Hence, the correct option is option D.
Note:
That $ sin \theta = 0 $ , corresponds to the central maxima while $ \dfrac{{\pi a sin \theta }}{\lambda } = \pi $ corresponds to the first minima. The general condition for destructive interference is $ a sin \theta = n\lambda $ . This equation gives the values of $ \theta $ for which the diffraction pattern has zero light intensity—that is, when a dark fringe is formed. However, it tells us nothing about the variation in light intensity along the screen.
Recently Updated Pages
Master Class 10 Computer Science: Engaging Questions & Answers for Success

Master Class 10 General Knowledge: Engaging Questions & Answers for Success

Master Class 10 English: Engaging Questions & Answers for Success

Master Class 10 Social Science: Engaging Questions & Answers for Success

Master Class 10 Maths: Engaging Questions & Answers for Success

Master Class 10 Science: Engaging Questions & Answers for Success

Trending doubts
Which is more stable and why class 12 chemistry CBSE

Which are the Top 10 Largest Countries of the World?

Draw a labelled sketch of the human eye class 12 physics CBSE

Differentiate between homogeneous and heterogeneous class 12 chemistry CBSE

What are the major means of transport Explain each class 12 social science CBSE

Sulphuric acid is known as the king of acids State class 12 chemistry CBSE

