Courses
Courses for Kids
Free study material
Offline Centres
More
Store Icon
Store
seo-qna
SearchIcon
banner

In ……………………, laws were made in the interest of women labourers.
A.1891
B.1881
C.1871
D.1861

Answer
VerifiedVerified
558.9k+ views
Hint: The Age of Consent Act of 1891 (also known as Act No. X of 1891) was a legislation promulgated in British India on March 19, 1891, which changed the age of consent for sexual intercourse for all married or unmarried girls from 10 years old. Raise to 12 years old. In all jurisdictions, violations will be subject to criminal prosecution and be regarded as rape.

Complete answer:
The Age of Consent Act is an amendment to the Indian Penal Code and Criminal Procedure Act of 1882 (the "Rape Case") and was introduced as a bill by Sir Andrew Scoble in the Governor’s Legislative Council on January 9, 1891. Indian general in Kolkata. There was a debate on the day of the meeting and it was opposed by Council Member Sir Romesh Chand Mitter (from Bangladesh) on the grounds that it interfered with the orthodox Hindu code, but it was obtained by Council member Rao Bahadur Krishnaji Lakshman Nulkar (From Mumbai) and the support of the Chairman of the Islamic Conference. Council, Governor and Governor Lord Lansdowne.

Cases: In 1884, Rukhmabai, a 20-year-old woman, was taken to the Bombay High Court by her husband Bhikaji after she refused to live with Bhikaji. He married him when he was 11 years old, never married, and lived separately for nearly 8 years, so he refused to move back with him. She eventually lost the case. The trial is one of the prerequisites for the passage of the legislation. In 1889, Phulmoni Dasi, an 11-year-old Bengali girl, died after being brutally raped by her 35-year-old husband Hari Mohan Maitee, which was a catalyst for its legislation. He was charged with rape, but was found guilty of causing death inadvertently due to rash and negligence.

Hence, the correct answer is option (A).

Note:The bill was opposed by many Orthodox leaders, who considered it an interference in Hinduism. Bal Gangadhar Tilak opposed the bill, stating that “we don’t want the government to be involved in regulating our social customs or lifestyles, and even think that government actions will be very beneficial and appropriate measures”.