Courses
Courses for Kids
Free study material
Offline Centres
More
Store Icon
Store
seo-qna
SearchIcon
banner

Who was the Chief Justice of India when public interest litigation (PIL) was introduced to the Indian Judicial System?
(A) M. Hidayatullah
(B) A.M. Ahmadi
(C) A. S. Anand
(D) P.N. Bhagwati

Answer
VerifiedVerified
546.9k+ views
Hint: Public Interest Litigation in India is to ensure justice to the socially undeveloped classes of our community. In common, it comprises wide public issues and the practice of law to understand them.

Complete answer:
Public Interest litigation is the aim of law to assist furnish human rights and equivalence or put up questions of the vast social question. It assists to solve the crises and topics of minority or disadvantaged organizations and selves. Public interest outbreaks may ensue from both public and private entities. The belief of Public Interest Litigation initially originated in The United States of America in the mid-1980s. The phrase Public Interest Litigation was initially employed by an American titled Abraham Chayes. After the US acquired the PILL, many other countries commenced submitting it on the need of the residents of their country. In India, we had to stay till 1986 to acquire this system. It occurred under justice P.N. Bhagwati.
Public Interest Litigation is the judicial innovation which encourages any person who is public-spirited or who prefers to conduct on behalf of some people to catalogue a trial in the court. The Concept of PIL was acquainted by Justice PN Bhagwati.

Thus, option (D) is correct.

Note: Bhagwati initiated the beliefs of public interest litigation and absolute detriment to the Indian judicial system. The 17th Chief Justice of India, Bhagwati continued on the highest judicial post between July 1985 and December 1986. As a master of PILs, he had charged there was no need for a person to have any locus stand (the right or capacity to give rise to litigation or to emerge in a court) to hit the doors of a court on the topic of fundamental rights. He was also instrumental in increasing the purpose of criminals when he decreed that they too admired fundamental rights.