Question

At Jallianwala Bagh meeting ______________ ordered to open fire.
A) Benn
B) Irwin
C) Dyer
D) Montagu

Answer 1

Hint:
Jallianwala Bagh is a noteworthy garden and 'remembrance of public significance' in Amritsar, India, safeguarded in the memory of those injured and murdered in the Jallianwala Bagh Massacre that happened on the site on the celebration of Baisakhi, 13 April 1919. It houses a historical center, display and various commemoration structures.The Jallianwala Bagh slaughter, otherwise called the Amritsar slaughter, occurred on 13 April 1919, when Acting Brigadier-General Reginald Dyer requested soldiers of the British Indian Army to discharge their rifles into a horde of unarmed Indian civilians in Jallianwala Bagh, Amritsar, Punjab, executing at any rate 379 individuals and harming more than 1,200 others.

Complete Answer:
On Sunday, 13 April 1919, Dyer, persuaded a significant insurgence could occur, prohibited all gatherings. This notification was not generally spread, and numerous locals accumulated in the Bagh to praise the significant Indian celebration of Baisakhi, and calmly fight the capture and removal of two public pioneers, Satyapal and Saifuddin Kitchlew. Dyer and his soldiers entered the nursery, hindering the principle entrance behind them, took up position on a raised bank, and with no notice started shooting at the group for around ten minutes, coordinating their slugs to a great extent towards the couple of open doors through which individuals were attempting to escape, until the ammo gracefully was nearly depleted. The next day Dyer expressed in a report that "I have heard that somewhere in the range of 200 and 300 of the group were killed. My gathering terminated 1,650 rounds".
The Hunter Commission report distributed the next year by the Government of India scrutinized both Dyer by and by and furthermore the Government of the Punjab for neglecting to order a definite loss check, and cited a figure offered by the Sewa Samati (a Social Services Society) of 379 recognized dead,[1] and roughly 1,200 injured, of whom 192 were genuinely injured. The loss number assessed by the Indian National Congress was in excess of 1,500 harmed, with around 1,000 dead.
Dyer was commended for his activities by some in Britain, and in reality turned into a saint among a considerable lot of the individuals who were legitimately profiting by the British Raj, for example, individuals from the House of Lords.He was, nonetheless, generally upbraided and condemned in the House of Commons, whose July 1920 advisory group of examination reproached him. Since he was a warrior following up on orders, he was unable to be pursued for homicide. The military decided not to bring him under the watchful eye of a court-military, and his solitary discipline was to be eliminated from his present arrangement, turned down for a proposed advancement, and banished from additional work in India. Dyer therefore resigned from the military and got back to England, where he kicked the bucket, unrepentant about his activities, in 1927.

Reactions captivated both the British and Indian people groups. Famous creator Rudyard Kipling pronounced at the time that Dyer "carried out his responsibility as he saw it". This episode stunned Rabindranath Tagore (the primary Indian and Asian Nobel laureate) so much that he denied his knighthood and expressed that "such mass killers aren't deserving of giving any title to anybody".

The slaughter caused a re-assessment by the British Army of its military function against regular citizens to negligible power at whatever point conceivable, albeit later British activities during the Mau insurrections in Kenya have driven history specialist Huw Bennett to take note of that the new strategy was not generally conveyed out. The military was retrained and grew less rough strategies for swarm control.

So the correct answer is C.

Note:
The degree of easy-going fierceness, and absence of any responsibility, paralyzed the whole nation, bringing about a tweaking loss of confidence of the overall Indian public in the aims of the UK.The insufficient request, along with the underlying awards for Dyer, fuelled incredible broad annoyance against the British among the Indian people, prompting the Non-collaboration Movement of 1920–22. Some students of history consider the scene an unequivocal advance towards the finish of British guidelines in India.
England never officially apologized for the slaughter yet communicated "lament" in 2019.