
A metal is irradiated with light of wavelength\[600nm\]. Given that the work function of the metal is \[1.0eV\]. The de Broglie wavelength of the ejected electron is close to:
A. $6.6 \times {10^{ - 7}}m$
B. $8.9 \times {10^{ - 11}}m$
C. $1.3 \times {10^{ - 9}}m$
D. $6.6 \times {10^{ - 13}}m$
Answer
601.2k+ views
Hint: To solve this question we will consider the concepts of incident light and use the formula of energy of an incident light. Also, we will make use of the Kinetic energy of a photoelectron by de-Broglie's justification to Bohr’s assumption.
Complete step by step answer: Let’s first note down all the given quantities:
$\lambda $ (De Broglie’s wavelength) $ = 600nm = 600 \times {10^{ - 9}}m$
Work function, w.f. = $1.0eV = 1.0 \times {10^{ - 19}} \times 1.6J$
Also, we know that work function w.f. = $h{v_0}$
Thus, we know that total energy is equal to the summation of work function and kinetic energy. Therefore, it is represented as $hv = h{v_0} + K.E.$
From de Broglie’s justification to Bohr’s relationship we know that,
$K.E = \dfrac{{{p^2}}}{{2m}}$= $\dfrac{{{h^2}}}{{2m{\lambda ^2}}}$
Here, we also know that de Broglie’s wavelength $\lambda $ =$\dfrac{h}{p}$
As we know that the energy of an incident light is
$E = \dfrac{{hc}}{\lambda }$
where E is the photon energy, h is the Planck’s constant, $\lambda $ is the wavelength of a photoelectron and c is the speed of light in vacuum.
Then, also we know from Planck’s Einstein relation that
$E = h\vartheta $
Where h is the Planck’s constant and $\vartheta $ is the photon’s frequency.
Thus, E = $hv = \dfrac{{hc}}{\lambda }$
Let’s place all the values in this equation:
E= $\dfrac{{6.625 \times {{10}^{ - 34}} \times 3 \times {{10}^8}}}{{600 \times {{10}^{ - 9}}}}$ = $3.313 \times {10^{ - 9}}J$
Here, we will substitute the formula of kinetic energy
$K.E = hv - h{v_0}$ (Since,\[E = hv\] and $W = h{v_0}$ )
$K.E = E - W$ = (3.313-1.16)$ \times {10^{ - 9}}J$
As we know that, $\dfrac{{{h^2}}}{{2m{\lambda ^2}}} = 1.713 \times {10^{ - 19}}J$
Thus, ${\lambda ^2} = \dfrac{{{{(6.626 \times {{10}^{ - 34}})}^2}}}{{2(9.1 \times {{10}^{ - 31}})(1.713 \times {{10}^{ - 19}})}}$
So, $\lambda = 1.28 \times {10^{ - 9}}m$
Therefore, de Broglie’s wavelength of the ejected electron is approximately equal to $1.3 \times {10^{ - 9}}m$.
So, the correct answer is “Option C”.
Note: We must know that De Broglie did not have any actual experimental evidence for his conjecture. Clinton J. Davisson and Lester H. Germer were shooting electron particles in a nickel crystal. What they saw was electron diffraction similar to wave diffraction against crystals (x-rays). George P. Thomson also fired electrons into thin metal foil, giving him the same results as Davisson and Germer.
Complete step by step answer: Let’s first note down all the given quantities:
$\lambda $ (De Broglie’s wavelength) $ = 600nm = 600 \times {10^{ - 9}}m$
Work function, w.f. = $1.0eV = 1.0 \times {10^{ - 19}} \times 1.6J$
Also, we know that work function w.f. = $h{v_0}$
Thus, we know that total energy is equal to the summation of work function and kinetic energy. Therefore, it is represented as $hv = h{v_0} + K.E.$
From de Broglie’s justification to Bohr’s relationship we know that,
$K.E = \dfrac{{{p^2}}}{{2m}}$= $\dfrac{{{h^2}}}{{2m{\lambda ^2}}}$
Here, we also know that de Broglie’s wavelength $\lambda $ =$\dfrac{h}{p}$
As we know that the energy of an incident light is
$E = \dfrac{{hc}}{\lambda }$
where E is the photon energy, h is the Planck’s constant, $\lambda $ is the wavelength of a photoelectron and c is the speed of light in vacuum.
Then, also we know from Planck’s Einstein relation that
$E = h\vartheta $
Where h is the Planck’s constant and $\vartheta $ is the photon’s frequency.
Thus, E = $hv = \dfrac{{hc}}{\lambda }$
Let’s place all the values in this equation:
E= $\dfrac{{6.625 \times {{10}^{ - 34}} \times 3 \times {{10}^8}}}{{600 \times {{10}^{ - 9}}}}$ = $3.313 \times {10^{ - 9}}J$
Here, we will substitute the formula of kinetic energy
$K.E = hv - h{v_0}$ (Since,\[E = hv\] and $W = h{v_0}$ )
$K.E = E - W$ = (3.313-1.16)$ \times {10^{ - 9}}J$
As we know that, $\dfrac{{{h^2}}}{{2m{\lambda ^2}}} = 1.713 \times {10^{ - 19}}J$
Thus, ${\lambda ^2} = \dfrac{{{{(6.626 \times {{10}^{ - 34}})}^2}}}{{2(9.1 \times {{10}^{ - 31}})(1.713 \times {{10}^{ - 19}})}}$
So, $\lambda = 1.28 \times {10^{ - 9}}m$
Therefore, de Broglie’s wavelength of the ejected electron is approximately equal to $1.3 \times {10^{ - 9}}m$.
So, the correct answer is “Option C”.
Note: We must know that De Broglie did not have any actual experimental evidence for his conjecture. Clinton J. Davisson and Lester H. Germer were shooting electron particles in a nickel crystal. What they saw was electron diffraction similar to wave diffraction against crystals (x-rays). George P. Thomson also fired electrons into thin metal foil, giving him the same results as Davisson and Germer.
Recently Updated Pages
Basicity of sulphurous acid and sulphuric acid are

Master Class 11 Business Studies: Engaging Questions & Answers for Success

Master Class 11 Computer Science: Engaging Questions & Answers for Success

Master Class 11 Economics: Engaging Questions & Answers for Success

Master Class 11 Social Science: Engaging Questions & Answers for Success

Master Class 11 English: Engaging Questions & Answers for Success

Trending doubts
One Metric ton is equal to kg A 10000 B 1000 C 100 class 11 physics CBSE

The largest wind power cluster is located in the state class 11 social science CBSE

Explain zero factorial class 11 maths CBSE

State and prove Bernoullis theorem class 11 physics CBSE

Which among the following are examples of coming together class 11 social science CBSE

Can anyone list 10 advantages and disadvantages of friction

