
Who rediscovered Mendel’s work?
Answer
573.3k+ views
Hint:-In the year 1900, a decade after Mendel wrote his papers, three botanists independently re-discovered the work of Mendel. They helped broaden understanding in the science world of the Mendelian laws of inheritance.
Complete step-by-step solution:-Mendel performed analyses of 34 different strains of peas after exploring different animal and plant environments, and selected 22 kinds for further experimentation. He preferred to study characteristics that were distinct and discontinuous and demonstrated strong superiority and recessiveness trends.
Often known as the first law of Mendel, the "law of segregation" applies to Mendel 's evidence that recessive characteristics reappear in predictable patterns. The now-famous 3:1 ratios were generated by crosses of peas which varied in one characteristic. Complex studies which followed the variations of two or three characteristics led to the recombination patterns now known as the second law of Mendel, or the "law of independent assortment."
At a meeting of the Brno Society for Natural History in March 1865, Mendel presented his findings and published in the 1866 issue of the Society's Proceedings his paper "Work on Plant Hybrids." He also submitted reprints to influential scientists of his paper, but got no publicity and almost no comprehension.
Contemporaries tended to disregard the "numbers and percentages" of Mendel as purely numerical and devoid of a respectable system of philosophy. However, Sir Ronald A. Fisher argued that the experimental design recorded in the classic paper of Mendel was so exquisite that the experiments had to be a proof, or demonstration, of a hypothesis previously proposed by Mendel.
In addition, Fisher concluded that Mendel's ratios are closer to the statistical expectation than the theory of sampling would suggest, and he maintained that without a "pure miracle of chance" certain findings could not be achieved. While Mendel was discouraged by the scientific community's lack of reaction, he remained persuaded of the fundamental importance and universality of his work.
However, Mendel and his laws were 'rediscovered' by Hugo Marie de Vries, Karl Franz Joseph Correns, and Erich Tschermak von Seysenegg at the beginning of the twentieth century, securely adding the name of Mendel to the fundamental laws of genetics. William Bateson, who, through his own research, came close to rediscover Mendel 's laws, became one of the earliest proponents of Mendelian genetics.
So from these discussions we can conclude that Hugo Marie de Vries, Karl Franz Joseph Correns, and Erich Tschermak von Seysenegg were the one who rediscovered Mendel’s work.
Note:- While the name of Gregor Mendel is now linked to the basic laws of genetics, for over thirty years his study was largely neglected and mistaken. A modern system able to fit Mendel's "ratios and numbers" was developed between the 1860s and 1900 in the study of cell division, fertilisation, and the behaviour of subcellular structures.
Science historians say that, before discovering Mendel 's article, de Vries, Correns, and Tschermak sought to highlight their own ingenuity by pretending to have found the rules of inheritance. Citing the previous work of Mendel also helped them escape a target war.
Complete step-by-step solution:-Mendel performed analyses of 34 different strains of peas after exploring different animal and plant environments, and selected 22 kinds for further experimentation. He preferred to study characteristics that were distinct and discontinuous and demonstrated strong superiority and recessiveness trends.
Often known as the first law of Mendel, the "law of segregation" applies to Mendel 's evidence that recessive characteristics reappear in predictable patterns. The now-famous 3:1 ratios were generated by crosses of peas which varied in one characteristic. Complex studies which followed the variations of two or three characteristics led to the recombination patterns now known as the second law of Mendel, or the "law of independent assortment."
At a meeting of the Brno Society for Natural History in March 1865, Mendel presented his findings and published in the 1866 issue of the Society's Proceedings his paper "Work on Plant Hybrids." He also submitted reprints to influential scientists of his paper, but got no publicity and almost no comprehension.
Contemporaries tended to disregard the "numbers and percentages" of Mendel as purely numerical and devoid of a respectable system of philosophy. However, Sir Ronald A. Fisher argued that the experimental design recorded in the classic paper of Mendel was so exquisite that the experiments had to be a proof, or demonstration, of a hypothesis previously proposed by Mendel.
In addition, Fisher concluded that Mendel's ratios are closer to the statistical expectation than the theory of sampling would suggest, and he maintained that without a "pure miracle of chance" certain findings could not be achieved. While Mendel was discouraged by the scientific community's lack of reaction, he remained persuaded of the fundamental importance and universality of his work.
However, Mendel and his laws were 'rediscovered' by Hugo Marie de Vries, Karl Franz Joseph Correns, and Erich Tschermak von Seysenegg at the beginning of the twentieth century, securely adding the name of Mendel to the fundamental laws of genetics. William Bateson, who, through his own research, came close to rediscover Mendel 's laws, became one of the earliest proponents of Mendelian genetics.
So from these discussions we can conclude that Hugo Marie de Vries, Karl Franz Joseph Correns, and Erich Tschermak von Seysenegg were the one who rediscovered Mendel’s work.
Note:- While the name of Gregor Mendel is now linked to the basic laws of genetics, for over thirty years his study was largely neglected and mistaken. A modern system able to fit Mendel's "ratios and numbers" was developed between the 1860s and 1900 in the study of cell division, fertilisation, and the behaviour of subcellular structures.
Science historians say that, before discovering Mendel 's article, de Vries, Correns, and Tschermak sought to highlight their own ingenuity by pretending to have found the rules of inheritance. Citing the previous work of Mendel also helped them escape a target war.
Recently Updated Pages
The number of solutions in x in 02pi for which sqrt class 12 maths CBSE

Write any two methods of preparation of phenol Give class 12 chemistry CBSE

Differentiate between action potential and resting class 12 biology CBSE

Two plane mirrors arranged at right angles to each class 12 physics CBSE

Which of the following molecules is are chiral A I class 12 chemistry CBSE

Name different types of neurons and give one function class 12 biology CBSE

Trending doubts
Which are the Top 10 Largest Countries of the World?

What are the major means of transport Explain each class 12 social science CBSE

Draw a labelled sketch of the human eye class 12 physics CBSE

Differentiate between insitu conservation and exsitu class 12 biology CBSE

State the principle of an ac generator and explain class 12 physics CBSE

Differentiate between homogeneous and heterogeneous class 12 chemistry CBSE

