Question

Which one of the following was annexed on the basis of Dalhousie’s ‘Doctrine of Lapse’?
A. Punjab
B. Awadh
C. Satara
D. Hyderabad

Answer 1

Hint: In the year 1848, Lord Dalhousie came to India as the Governor-General. He was from the earliest starting point resolved to expand direct British standard over as huge territory as could reasonably be expected.

Complete step-by-step solution:
The company took control over the princely state of Satara in 1848. The annexation policy of doctrine of lapse was applied by the British East India Company in India until 1859. According to the doctrine, any Indian princely state under the British East India Company upon the death of the King will have to give up their throne if the King dies without having any male child as the heir. What's more, the British chose whether potential rulers were sufficiently equipped. The doctrine and its applications were widely regarded as illegitimate. Nonetheless, it was explained by the Court of Directors of the East India Company as right on time as 1847, and a few more modest states had just been attached under this tenet before Dalhousie assumed control over the post of Governor-General. Dalhousie utilized the strategy most energetically and broadly, however, so it is commonly connected with him.

Thus, option (C) is correct.

Note: At the hour of its appropriation, the British East India Company had supreme regulatory locale over wide districts of the subcontinent. The organization assumed control over the regal conditions of Satara (1848), Jaitpur and Sambalpur (1849), Bhagat (1850), Jhansi (1853), Nagpur (1854), Tore and Arcot(1855) under the details of the regulation of slip by. Oudh (1856) is generally accepted to have been added under the Doctrine of Lapse. Anyway, it was annexed by Lord Dalhousie under the guise of misgovernance. Generally guaranteeing that the ruler was not controlling appropriately, the Company added around 4,000,000 pounds real to its yearly income by the goodness of this precept.