Question

Which of the following statements regarding Danish are correct?
1. They could not establish their position in India.
2. They sold all their settlements to Portuguese.
3. They were more concerned with missionary activities than trade.
4. They established their factory at Masulipatnam and Porto- Novo.
A. 1, 3 and 4
B. 2, 3 and 4
C. 1, 2 and 3
D. All of these

Answer 1

Hint:We have to remember that the Danish existence in India was of slight prominence to the leading European authorities as they exemplified neither a military nor a mercantile menace. Danish India was the caption assigned to the regions of Denmark in India, constructing trait of the Danish colonial kingdom. Denmark–Norway held colonial holdings in India for more than 202 years.

Complete answer:
We have to know instead of innumerable hindrances, the Danish - Norway interests survived to cling to their colonial possessions and, at times, to carve out a productive niche in international trade by seizing benefit of wars between gigantic countries and suggesting foreign trade under an unbiased flag.
By 1625 , a factory had been inaugurated at Masulipatnam (present-day Krishna district of Andhra Pradesh), the extensively crucial emporium in the province. Secondary trading offices were installed at Pipli and Balasore.
Despite this, by 1627 the settlement was in such an impoverished monetary state that it had just three ships left and was powerless to pay the agreed-upon homage to the Nayak, heightening local uncertainties. The Danish- Norwegian existence was also despised by English and Dutch traders who speculated them to be regulated under the preservation of their navies without suffering any of the expenses. However, they could not break down Danish - Norwegian trade, due to tactful significance related to their respective countries' interest in European conflicts.
We have to know that Denmark-Norway encompassing the town of Tharangambadi (in Tamil Nadu), Serampore (in West Bengal), and the Nicobar Islands.

Hence, the correct answer is option (B).

Note:We must remember that the Dano-Norwegian endeavours in India, as elsewhere, were generally undercapitalised and never proficient to conquer or monopolise commerce routes in the indistinguishable way that British, French, and Portuguese investments could.