Question

Which of the following bills cannot be first introduced in Rajya sabha?
A. Bills pertaining to the removal of the president by impeachment
B. Bills pertaining to the power of the Supreme court of the state judiciary
C. Bills bringing the state under the President's rule.
D. Money Bills

Answer 1

Hint: A Bill is a draft statute that becomes law after it is passed by both the Houses of Parliament and assented to by the President. All legislative proposals are brought to the Parliament in the form of Bills.

Complete answer:
Money Bills can be presented distinctly in Lok Sabha. Money bills passed by the Lok Sabha are shipped off the Rajya Sabha. The Rajya Sabha may not correct cash charges however can suggest changes. To ensure that Rajya Sabha doesn't change the bill by adding some non-cash matters, the Lok Sabha Speaker affirms the bill as a cash bill prior to sending it to the upper house, and the choice of the Speaker is official on both the Houses. A money bill should be sent back to the Lok Sabha within 14 days or the bill is considered to have passed by the two houses. In the structure, it was initially passed by the Lok Sabha.

Additional Information: A money bill or supply bill is a bill that exclusively concerns tax assessment or government spending (otherwise called an assignment of cash), rather than changes in open law. The idea of money bills in India went to the front line during the sanctioning of the Aadhar Act, 2016. Notwithstanding obstruction by the resistance, the Aadhaar Bill was affirmed as a 'money bill' by the Speaker of the Lower House. The Upper House proposed certain revisions, at the end of the day the BJP-ruled Lower House dismissed the alterations recommended by the Upper House and singularly established the Aadhar Act, 2016. Quickly from that point, Jairam Ramesh, a senior Congress pioneer, provoked the speaker's choice to treat the Aadhar Bill as a 'money bill' under the steady gaze of the Supreme Court of India.

Hence, the answer is option D.

Note: Article 110(3) of the Constitution of India completely expresses that 'if any inquiry emerges if a Bill is a Money Bill, the choice of the Speaker of the House of the People subsequently will be conclusive'. Hence, one of the prime protected inquiries under the steady gaze of the Supreme Court is whether it can survey the speaker's declaration ordering a bill as a 'money bill'. In three earlier cases, the Supreme Court of India would not survey the Speaker's testament. Nonetheless, a few pundits have contended that the Court's previous decisions were wrong and Article 110(3) settled on the Speaker's choice "last" with the end goal of the two Houses of the Parliament, not for the Supreme Court of India.