Courses
Courses for Kids
Free study material
Offline Centres
More
Store Icon
Store
seo-qna
SearchIcon
banner

What is true about the obligation of states and the unions in respect of their administrative relations under article $256$ of the constitution of India?
$a)$ The executive power of every state shall be so exercised to ensure compliance with laws made by parliament.
$b)$ Any existing laws which apply in the state and executive power of the union shall extend giving such directions to a state as may appear to the government of India to be necessary for the purpose.
$c)$ Only(a)
$d)$ Both(a) and (b)

Answer
VerifiedVerified
549k+ views
Hint: India may be a union of states. The constitution of India has classified the legislative, executive, and financial powers between the middle and therefore the states, which provides the constitution a federal character whereas the judiciary is integrated during a hierarchical data structure.

Complete step by step answer:
The Constitution has placed a federal structure i.e. dual government. it's further restricted the executive power of the State to pave the way for central executive power to be exercised in an unrestricted manner
The Administrative relations between the middle and therefore the states is addressed in article 256 and article 263. The court encouraged the center to support its constitutional commission under article 256 and guide the states to work against the groups. The Centre should respond to its case in the name of "Cooperative-federalism"
The exact meaning of article 256 that the executive rule of each State shall be so applied on ensuring compliance with the laws established by the parliament and any current laws which apply therein State, and therefore the executive authority of the Union shall reach the giving of such directions to a State as may appear to the government of India to be necessary for that mission".
So, the correct answer is Option D.

Note: Inter-state councils and succeeding State Commerce Commission organize Centre’s administration and authors like G.N. Singh says that states are reduced to the status of municipalities. The comment could also be uncharitable but Articles like 256, 246, 257, and 263 are potent evidence by which the executive activities by states are often made to fall in line with the needs of the Centre.