
The CFSE for ${\left[ {{\text{CoC}}{{\text{l}}_6}} \right]^{4 - }}$ complex is $18000\,{\text{c}}{{\text{m}}^{ - 1}}$. The $ $ for ${\left[ {{\text{CoC}}{{\text{l}}_4}} \right]^{2 -}}$ will be
A. $18000\,{\text{c}}{{\text{m}}^{ - 1}}$
B. $16000\,{\text{c}}{{\text{m}}^{ - 1}}$
C. $6000\,{\text{c}}{{\text{m}}^{ - 1}}$
D. $2000\,{\text{c}}{{\text{m}}^{ - 1}}$
Answer
568.5k+ views
Hint: The octahedral crystal field splitting is equal to the $4/9$ of octahedral crystal field splitting. The octahedral crystal field splitting is larger than the tetrahedral crystal field splitting.
The following formula can be used-
$
{{\text{ }}_{{\text{td}}}}\,{\text{ = }}\,\dfrac{{\text{4}}}{{\,{\text{9}}}}{{\text{ }}_{{\text{oh}}}}
$
Step by step answer: he octahedral field splitting is represented as follows:
Valence electronic configuration of ${\text{C}}{{\text{o}}^{2 + }}$ = ${\text{3}}{{\text{d}}^7}$
The tetrahedral field splitting is represented as follows:
The relation between the energy difference of tetrahedral and octahedral field is as follows:
\[{{\text{ }}_{{\text{td}}}}\,{\text{ = }}\,\dfrac{{\text{4}}}{{\,{\text{9}}}}{{\text{ }}_{{\text{oh}}}}\]
Where,
\[{{\text{ }}_{{\text{td}}}}\]is the tetrahedral field splitting energy.
${ _{{\text{oh}}}}$ is the octahedral field splitting energy.
In the octahedral complex, six ligands split the energy level of the metal and the tetrahedral complex four ligands split the energy level of the metal, so the value of octahedral crystal field splitting is larger than the tetrahedral crystal field splitting.
Substitute $18000\,{\text{c}}{{\text{m}}^{ - 1}}$ for ${ _{{\text{oh}}}}$.
\[{{\text{ }}_{{\text{td}}}}\,{\text{ = }}\,\dfrac{{\text{4}}}{{\,{\text{9}}}} \times 18000\,{\text{c}}{{\text{m}}^{ - 1}}\]
\[{{\text{ }}_{{\text{td}}}}\,{\text{ = }}\,8000\,{\text{c}}{{\text{m}}^{ - 1}}\]
So, the tetrahedral field splitting energy for ${\left[ {{\text{CoC}}{{\text{l}}_4}} \right]^{2 - }}$complex is $8000\,{\text{c}}{{\text{m}}^{ - 1}}$.
So, option (A), (B) and (D) are incorrect.
Therefore, option (C) $8000\,{\text{c}}{{\text{m}}^{ - 1}}$ is correct.
Additional information: The ${ _{{\text{oh}}}}$ per ligand is determined by dividing the ${ _{{\text{oh}}}}$ by six and \[{{\text{ }}_{{\text{td}}}}\] per ligand is determined by dividing the \[{{\text{ }}_{{\text{td}}}}\] by four.
Note: Both the $ $values for octahedral as well as tetrahedral should be in the same unit. As the octahedral crystal field splitting is always larger than the tetrahedral crystal field splitting so, here, the answer of \[{{\text{ }}_{{\text{td}}}}\] will be less than$18000\,{\text{c}}{{\text{m}}^{ - 1}}$. For the calculation of ${ _{{\text{oh}}}}$ from the given \[{{\text{ }}_{{\text{td}}}}\], the formula used will be \[\,{{\text{ }}_{{\text{oh}}}}{\text{ = }}\,\dfrac{9}{{\,4}}{{\text{ }}_{{\text{td}}}}\].
The following formula can be used-
$
{{\text{ }}_{{\text{td}}}}\,{\text{ = }}\,\dfrac{{\text{4}}}{{\,{\text{9}}}}{{\text{ }}_{{\text{oh}}}}
$
Step by step answer: he octahedral field splitting is represented as follows:
Valence electronic configuration of ${\text{C}}{{\text{o}}^{2 + }}$ = ${\text{3}}{{\text{d}}^7}$
The tetrahedral field splitting is represented as follows:
The relation between the energy difference of tetrahedral and octahedral field is as follows:
\[{{\text{ }}_{{\text{td}}}}\,{\text{ = }}\,\dfrac{{\text{4}}}{{\,{\text{9}}}}{{\text{ }}_{{\text{oh}}}}\]
Where,
\[{{\text{ }}_{{\text{td}}}}\]is the tetrahedral field splitting energy.
${ _{{\text{oh}}}}$ is the octahedral field splitting energy.
In the octahedral complex, six ligands split the energy level of the metal and the tetrahedral complex four ligands split the energy level of the metal, so the value of octahedral crystal field splitting is larger than the tetrahedral crystal field splitting.
Substitute $18000\,{\text{c}}{{\text{m}}^{ - 1}}$ for ${ _{{\text{oh}}}}$.
\[{{\text{ }}_{{\text{td}}}}\,{\text{ = }}\,\dfrac{{\text{4}}}{{\,{\text{9}}}} \times 18000\,{\text{c}}{{\text{m}}^{ - 1}}\]
\[{{\text{ }}_{{\text{td}}}}\,{\text{ = }}\,8000\,{\text{c}}{{\text{m}}^{ - 1}}\]
So, the tetrahedral field splitting energy for ${\left[ {{\text{CoC}}{{\text{l}}_4}} \right]^{2 - }}$complex is $8000\,{\text{c}}{{\text{m}}^{ - 1}}$.
So, option (A), (B) and (D) are incorrect.
Therefore, option (C) $8000\,{\text{c}}{{\text{m}}^{ - 1}}$ is correct.
Additional information: The ${ _{{\text{oh}}}}$ per ligand is determined by dividing the ${ _{{\text{oh}}}}$ by six and \[{{\text{ }}_{{\text{td}}}}\] per ligand is determined by dividing the \[{{\text{ }}_{{\text{td}}}}\] by four.
Note: Both the $ $values for octahedral as well as tetrahedral should be in the same unit. As the octahedral crystal field splitting is always larger than the tetrahedral crystal field splitting so, here, the answer of \[{{\text{ }}_{{\text{td}}}}\] will be less than$18000\,{\text{c}}{{\text{m}}^{ - 1}}$. For the calculation of ${ _{{\text{oh}}}}$ from the given \[{{\text{ }}_{{\text{td}}}}\], the formula used will be \[\,{{\text{ }}_{{\text{oh}}}}{\text{ = }}\,\dfrac{9}{{\,4}}{{\text{ }}_{{\text{td}}}}\].
Recently Updated Pages
The passage of an electric current through a solution class 12 physics CBSE

The rate law for the reaction below is given by the class 12 chemistry CBSE

Anisole can be prepared by the action of methyl iodide class 12 chemistry CBSE

Why was Mendels work not recognized Give any three class 12 biology CBSE

Multiplication of electron velocity and radius for class 12 chemistry CBSE

What is the effective value RMS value of current i class 12 physics CBSE

Trending doubts
What are the major means of transport Explain each class 12 social science CBSE

Which are the Top 10 Largest Countries of the World?

Draw a labelled sketch of the human eye class 12 physics CBSE

Explain sex determination in humans with line diag class 12 biology CBSE

The pH of the pancreatic juice is A 64 B 86 C 120 D class 12 biology CBSE

Explain sex determination in humans with the help of class 12 biology CBSE

