Pick out the correct statements-
A. ${\psi _{1s(H)}}$ and ${\psi _{2s(H)}}$ are orthogonal to each other.
B. The degeneracy of the orbitals of the H-atom having energy \[ - \dfrac{{Rydberg}}{{16}}\] is \[30\].
C. The average distance of the \[2s\] electron from the nucleus of H-atom is \[4{a_ \circ }\].
D. The most probable distance of an electron in the \[2p - \]orbital of an H-atom is \[4{a_ \circ }\].
Answer
565.5k+ views
Hint: We will analyze each statement accordingly. Wave functions are orthogonal to each other when their product is equal to zero. Then we will find the degeneracy of the orbital of the H-atom with the help of the ionization energy of the H-atom. We will use a formula for finding the average distance of an orbital electron from its nucleus. In the same manner we will calculate the most probable distance.
Formula Used:
\[(i){\text{ }}\int {{\psi _a}} {\text{ }}{\psi _b}{\text{ = }}\left\langle {\dfrac{a}{b}} \right\rangle \]
Where, \[{\psi _a}\] and \[{\psi _b}\] are wave functions of a and b orbital.
\[(ii)\] Ionization Energy \[{\text{ = - }}\dfrac{{Rydberg}}{{{n^2}}}\]
Where \[n\] is the Bohr orbit of a hydrogen atom.
\[(iii)\] Average Distance \[{\text{ = }}\dfrac{{{a_ \circ }}}{2}\left[ {3{n^2} - l\left( {l + 1} \right)} \right]\]
Where, \[n\] is the principal quantum number and \[l\] is azimuthal quantum number.
Complete Answer:
We will analyze each statement which are mention above and then we will be able to find the correct answer:
For A:
Let the wave function for a orbital and b orbital be represented by \[{\psi _a}\] and \[{\psi _b}\] then they are said to be orthogonal to other when the integration of their product is equal to zero. It can be represented as:
\[{\text{ }}\int {{\psi _a}} {\text{ }}{\psi _b}{\text{ = }}\left\langle {\dfrac{a}{b}} \right\rangle {\text{ = 0}}\]
According to the question we have ${\psi _{1s(H)}}$ and ${\psi _{2s(H)}}$ as our wave function. On comparing we get \[a = {\text{ }}1s\] and \[b = {\text{ }}2s\]. Thus on substituting the values in above equation we get the result as:
\[{\text{ }}\int {{\psi _a}} {\text{ }}{\psi _b}{\text{ = }}\left\langle {\dfrac{a}{b}} \right\rangle {\text{ }}\]
\[{\text{ }}\int {{\psi _{1s\left( H \right)}}} {\text{ }}{\psi _{2s\left( H \right)}}{\text{ = }}\left\langle {\dfrac{{1s}}{{2s}}} \right\rangle {\text{ }}\]
Since both belongs to same orbital we can say that,
\[{\text{ }}\int {{\psi _{1s\left( H \right)}}} {\text{ }}{\psi _{2s\left( H \right)}}{\text{ = }}\left\langle {\dfrac{{1s}}{{2s}}} \right\rangle {\text{ = 0}}\]
Hence they are orthogonal to each other.
For B:
We can find out the ionization energy of an electron by using relation:
Ionization Energy \[{\text{ = - }}\dfrac{{Rydberg}}{{{n^2}}}\]
According to the question it is given as \[ - \dfrac{{Rydberg}}{{16}}\]. Thus on comparing we get the value of n as,
\[{n^2}{\text{ }} = {\text{ 16}}\]
\[n{\text{ }} = {\text{ 4}}\]
The degeneracy of an orbital of an H- atom is equal to \[{n^2}\]. Since we got, \[n{\text{ }} = {\text{ 4}}\], therefore \[{n^2}{\text{ }} = {\text{ 16}}\].
But according to the question it is given as \[30\] , hence it is a wrong statement.
For C:
The average distance orbital electron can be found by using formula as;
Average Distance \[{\text{ = }}\dfrac{{{a_ \circ }}}{2}\left[ {3{n^2} - l\left( {l + 1} \right)} \right]\]
For \[2s\] electrons the value of \[n\] is two and the value of \[l\] is zero. Thus on substituting the value we get the average distance as,
Average Distance \[{\text{ = }}\dfrac{{{a_ \circ }}}{2}\left[ {3{{\left( 2 \right)}^2} - 0\left( {0 + 1} \right)} \right]\]
Average Distance \[{\text{ = }}\dfrac{{{a_ \circ }}}{2}{\text{ }} \times {\text{ 12}}\]
Average Distance \[{\text{ = 6}}{a_ \circ }{\text{ }}\]
But according to the question, the average distance is \[4{a_ \circ }\]. Hence it is also a wrong statement.
For D:
For finding most probable distance we have same formula for average distance which is equal to,
Most Probable Distance \[{\text{ = }}\dfrac{{{a_ \circ }}}{2}\left[ {3{n^2} - l\left( {l + 1} \right)} \right]\]
For \[2p - \]orbital we have \[n\] equal to two and \[l\] equals to one. On substituting values we get the most probable distance as,
Most Probable Distance \[{\text{ = }}\dfrac{{{a_ \circ }}}{2}\left[ {3{{\left( 2 \right)}^2} - 1\left( {1 + 1} \right)} \right]\]
Most Probable Distance \[{\text{ = }}\dfrac{{{a_ \circ }}}{2}{\text{ }} \times {\text{ 10}}\]
Most Probable Distance \[{\text{ = 5}}{a_ \circ }\]
But according to the question it is given as \[4{a_ \circ }\] , therefore it is also a wrong statement.
Hence on observing each statement we can say that only A. statement is correct.
Note:
The most probable and average distance is measured in terms of \[{a_ \circ }\] . Here \[{a_ \circ }\] is the radius of the orbit of the H- atom. The formula for calculating both distances is the same but their meanings are different. The unit of both distances is Angstrom \[({A_ \circ })\]. Wave function describes the motion of electrons in a particular orbit.
Formula Used:
\[(i){\text{ }}\int {{\psi _a}} {\text{ }}{\psi _b}{\text{ = }}\left\langle {\dfrac{a}{b}} \right\rangle \]
Where, \[{\psi _a}\] and \[{\psi _b}\] are wave functions of a and b orbital.
\[(ii)\] Ionization Energy \[{\text{ = - }}\dfrac{{Rydberg}}{{{n^2}}}\]
Where \[n\] is the Bohr orbit of a hydrogen atom.
\[(iii)\] Average Distance \[{\text{ = }}\dfrac{{{a_ \circ }}}{2}\left[ {3{n^2} - l\left( {l + 1} \right)} \right]\]
Where, \[n\] is the principal quantum number and \[l\] is azimuthal quantum number.
Complete Answer:
We will analyze each statement which are mention above and then we will be able to find the correct answer:
For A:
Let the wave function for a orbital and b orbital be represented by \[{\psi _a}\] and \[{\psi _b}\] then they are said to be orthogonal to other when the integration of their product is equal to zero. It can be represented as:
\[{\text{ }}\int {{\psi _a}} {\text{ }}{\psi _b}{\text{ = }}\left\langle {\dfrac{a}{b}} \right\rangle {\text{ = 0}}\]
According to the question we have ${\psi _{1s(H)}}$ and ${\psi _{2s(H)}}$ as our wave function. On comparing we get \[a = {\text{ }}1s\] and \[b = {\text{ }}2s\]. Thus on substituting the values in above equation we get the result as:
\[{\text{ }}\int {{\psi _a}} {\text{ }}{\psi _b}{\text{ = }}\left\langle {\dfrac{a}{b}} \right\rangle {\text{ }}\]
\[{\text{ }}\int {{\psi _{1s\left( H \right)}}} {\text{ }}{\psi _{2s\left( H \right)}}{\text{ = }}\left\langle {\dfrac{{1s}}{{2s}}} \right\rangle {\text{ }}\]
Since both belongs to same orbital we can say that,
\[{\text{ }}\int {{\psi _{1s\left( H \right)}}} {\text{ }}{\psi _{2s\left( H \right)}}{\text{ = }}\left\langle {\dfrac{{1s}}{{2s}}} \right\rangle {\text{ = 0}}\]
Hence they are orthogonal to each other.
For B:
We can find out the ionization energy of an electron by using relation:
Ionization Energy \[{\text{ = - }}\dfrac{{Rydberg}}{{{n^2}}}\]
According to the question it is given as \[ - \dfrac{{Rydberg}}{{16}}\]. Thus on comparing we get the value of n as,
\[{n^2}{\text{ }} = {\text{ 16}}\]
\[n{\text{ }} = {\text{ 4}}\]
The degeneracy of an orbital of an H- atom is equal to \[{n^2}\]. Since we got, \[n{\text{ }} = {\text{ 4}}\], therefore \[{n^2}{\text{ }} = {\text{ 16}}\].
But according to the question it is given as \[30\] , hence it is a wrong statement.
For C:
The average distance orbital electron can be found by using formula as;
Average Distance \[{\text{ = }}\dfrac{{{a_ \circ }}}{2}\left[ {3{n^2} - l\left( {l + 1} \right)} \right]\]
For \[2s\] electrons the value of \[n\] is two and the value of \[l\] is zero. Thus on substituting the value we get the average distance as,
Average Distance \[{\text{ = }}\dfrac{{{a_ \circ }}}{2}\left[ {3{{\left( 2 \right)}^2} - 0\left( {0 + 1} \right)} \right]\]
Average Distance \[{\text{ = }}\dfrac{{{a_ \circ }}}{2}{\text{ }} \times {\text{ 12}}\]
Average Distance \[{\text{ = 6}}{a_ \circ }{\text{ }}\]
But according to the question, the average distance is \[4{a_ \circ }\]. Hence it is also a wrong statement.
For D:
For finding most probable distance we have same formula for average distance which is equal to,
Most Probable Distance \[{\text{ = }}\dfrac{{{a_ \circ }}}{2}\left[ {3{n^2} - l\left( {l + 1} \right)} \right]\]
For \[2p - \]orbital we have \[n\] equal to two and \[l\] equals to one. On substituting values we get the most probable distance as,
Most Probable Distance \[{\text{ = }}\dfrac{{{a_ \circ }}}{2}\left[ {3{{\left( 2 \right)}^2} - 1\left( {1 + 1} \right)} \right]\]
Most Probable Distance \[{\text{ = }}\dfrac{{{a_ \circ }}}{2}{\text{ }} \times {\text{ 10}}\]
Most Probable Distance \[{\text{ = 5}}{a_ \circ }\]
But according to the question it is given as \[4{a_ \circ }\] , therefore it is also a wrong statement.
Hence on observing each statement we can say that only A. statement is correct.
Note:
The most probable and average distance is measured in terms of \[{a_ \circ }\] . Here \[{a_ \circ }\] is the radius of the orbit of the H- atom. The formula for calculating both distances is the same but their meanings are different. The unit of both distances is Angstrom \[({A_ \circ })\]. Wave function describes the motion of electrons in a particular orbit.
Recently Updated Pages
If x a + bt + ct2 where x is in meters and t is in class 11 physics CBSE

A car covers the first half distance between two places class 11 physics CBSE

The resultant of two vectors overrightarrow P and overrightarrow class 11 physics CBSE

Find the value of cos 135 class 11 maths CBSE

A mass M is held in place by an applied force F and class 11 physics CBSE

A solution of glucose in water is labelled as 10 dfracwv class 11 chemistry CBSE

Trending doubts
One Metric ton is equal to kg A 10000 B 1000 C 100 class 11 physics CBSE

Find the value of the expression given below sin 30circ class 11 maths CBSE

What do you mean by retardation What is its SI uni class 11 physics CBSE

Draw a diagram of nephron and explain its structur class 11 biology CBSE

10 examples of friction in our daily life

Difference between physical and chemical change class 11 chemistry CBSE

