Question

How long did the Constituent Assembly take to finally pass the Constitution?
A. About 6 months in 1949
B. Exactly a year since November 26, 1948
C. About 2 years since August 15, 1947
D. About 3 years since December 9, 1946

Answer 1

Hint: The Constitution of India is the ultimate commandment of India. The file lays down the background delineating important political policy, structure, measures, authorities, and responsibilities of government organizations and sets out essential rights, directive principles, and the responsibilities of citizens. It is the lengthiest inscribed constitution of any nation on earth.

Complete answer:
The Constitution of India came into dominance on January 26, 1950. At the time of its implementation, the Constitution comprised 395 Articles and 8 Schedules and was approximately 1,45,000 words long, making it the lengthiest national Constitution to ever be implemented. Every Article in the Constitution was discussed by the associates of the Constituent Assembly, who sat for 11 sessions and 166 days to form the Constitution, over an interval of 2 years and 11 months. This segment encompasses every single Article in the transformed Constitution of India (as of 2020), with its like-minded Article in the Draft Constitution of India, 1948. Each Article also comprises a summation of the discussions on that Article in the Constituent Assembly. The Articles are accumulated into 22 unalike portions, which emulates how they are programmed in the record of the Constitution of India, 1950. The Schedules to the Constitution, which are now 12 in number, expound on government strategy or guidelines in relation to precise Articles of the Constitution. Each Schedule in this segment is labeled with the conforming Article(s) for affluence of perception.

Thus, option (D) is correct.

Note: Bestowing to Granville Austin, "The constitution has purposely been articulated in generalizations (not in uncertain vocabularies) to preserve its elasticity. John Marshall, the 4th chief justice of the United States, said that a constitution's "great summaries should be noticeable, its significant matters chosen, and the negligible elements which constitute those matters be construed from the nature of the matters themselves."