Question

Why were jyoti rao phule and Ramaswamy Naicker critical of the national movement? Did their criticism help the national struggle in any way?

Answer 1

Hint:
 The nationalist movement in India was an early popular movement seeking India's independence from Great Britain. Although acts such as the Salt March of 1930 put pressure on colonial administration and made concessions, they remained limited in scope and did not achieve the full independence desired.


Complete step by step solution:
Jyotirao Govindrao Phule (11 April 1827 - 28 November 1890) was an Indian social activist, thinker, caste reformer, and writer from Maharashtra. Her work covers many areas including the inviolable eradication and the caste system and the emancipation of women.

Erode Venkatappa Ramasamy (17 September 1879 - 24 December 1973), known as Periyar, was an Indian social activist and politician who started the Kazhagam Self-Esteem and Dravida Movement.

They criticized the national movement led by upper-caste leaders for believing that it would serve the aims of the upper caste. After the movement, these people spoke again of inevitability. They will say again, "Me here and you over there." Periar left Congress in response to a case of inaccessibility. Yes, their criticism has helped the nation's struggle as a unit. Indeed, the powerful speeches, writings and movements of such low-caste leaders have sparked rethinking and self-criticism among nationalist upper-caste leaders.

Note:
The Salt March, also called Salty Satyagraha, is an act of nonviolent civil disobedience in colonial India led by Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi. The 25-day march took place from 12 March 1930 to 6 April 1930 as a direct action campaign of tax opposition and nonviolent protests against the British salt monopoly.