
In case of differences between two houses of Parliament on an ordinary bill, the issue is resolved by _______
A. President in consultation with the cabinet
B. Speaker of Lok Sabha and Chairman of Rajya Sabha
C. Convening a joint sitting of the two houses
D. The Supreme Court
Answer
547.2k+ views
Hint: We must remember that an Ordinary Bill can be presented in any of the Houses of Parliament while a cash bill must be presented in the Lok Sabha.
At the point when a non-cash bill is passed by the Lok Sabha and isn't endorsed by the Rajya Sabha, there is a stop between the two places of the Parliament.
Complete answer:
At that point, a joint meeting of the two houses is called and to determine the distinctions and to decide on a bill. Anyway, since there are 250 Rajya Sabha individuals and 552 Lok Sabha individuals, passing a bill in a joint house is constantly weighted to tilt towards the outcomes in the Lok Sabha.
Joint sitting is an additional conventional system given by the Constitution to settle the stop between both the Houses over the death of the bill. The President gathers a joint sitting which is directed by the Speaker of the Lok Sabha. Fundamentally a stop is appear to have happened in three circumstances after a bill has been passed by one House and sent to the next House:
1. On the off chance that the bull is dismissed by the other House;
2. In the event that there is a contradiction between the Houses with respect to alterations to be made in the bill;
3. On the off chance that over a half year has passed from the date of receipt of the bill by the other House without passing the bill.
The President can call joint meetings of the two Houses if a bill passed by one House is dismissed by the other House or if the corrections proposed to a bill by one House are not satisfactory to the next House, doesn't make any move on a bill dispatched to it for a half year. The choice is taken by a larger part of the absolute individuals present. The President can bring both the Houses to meet in a joint sitting for examining, pondering, and deciding on the bill to determine the issue. When there are differences between two houses of parliament on an ordinary bill, a joint sitting of the two houses is the method to resolve this issue
So, the correct answer is Option C.
Note: We must know that the gridlock over a bill in a joint sitting is settled by present and casting a ballot. Since the Lok Sabha has a bigger enrollment in a joint sitting commonly the desire of the Lok Sabha wins. After the entry of the bill in a joint sitting it is introduced to the President for his consent. However, no joint sitting can be called to determine a halt in the event of a Money Bill or a Constitutional Amendment bill.
At the point when a non-cash bill is passed by the Lok Sabha and isn't endorsed by the Rajya Sabha, there is a stop between the two places of the Parliament.
Complete answer:
At that point, a joint meeting of the two houses is called and to determine the distinctions and to decide on a bill. Anyway, since there are 250 Rajya Sabha individuals and 552 Lok Sabha individuals, passing a bill in a joint house is constantly weighted to tilt towards the outcomes in the Lok Sabha.
Joint sitting is an additional conventional system given by the Constitution to settle the stop between both the Houses over the death of the bill. The President gathers a joint sitting which is directed by the Speaker of the Lok Sabha. Fundamentally a stop is appear to have happened in three circumstances after a bill has been passed by one House and sent to the next House:
1. On the off chance that the bull is dismissed by the other House;
2. In the event that there is a contradiction between the Houses with respect to alterations to be made in the bill;
3. On the off chance that over a half year has passed from the date of receipt of the bill by the other House without passing the bill.
The President can call joint meetings of the two Houses if a bill passed by one House is dismissed by the other House or if the corrections proposed to a bill by one House are not satisfactory to the next House, doesn't make any move on a bill dispatched to it for a half year. The choice is taken by a larger part of the absolute individuals present. The President can bring both the Houses to meet in a joint sitting for examining, pondering, and deciding on the bill to determine the issue. When there are differences between two houses of parliament on an ordinary bill, a joint sitting of the two houses is the method to resolve this issue
So, the correct answer is Option C.
Note: We must know that the gridlock over a bill in a joint sitting is settled by present and casting a ballot. Since the Lok Sabha has a bigger enrollment in a joint sitting commonly the desire of the Lok Sabha wins. After the entry of the bill in a joint sitting it is introduced to the President for his consent. However, no joint sitting can be called to determine a halt in the event of a Money Bill or a Constitutional Amendment bill.
Recently Updated Pages
A man running at a speed 5 ms is viewed in the side class 12 physics CBSE

The number of solutions in x in 02pi for which sqrt class 12 maths CBSE

State and explain Hardy Weinbergs Principle class 12 biology CBSE

Write any two methods of preparation of phenol Give class 12 chemistry CBSE

Which of the following statements is wrong a Amnion class 12 biology CBSE

Differentiate between action potential and resting class 12 biology CBSE

Trending doubts
What are the major means of transport Explain each class 12 social science CBSE

Which are the Top 10 Largest Countries of the World?

Draw a labelled sketch of the human eye class 12 physics CBSE

Explain sex determination in humans with line diag class 12 biology CBSE

Explain sex determination in humans with the help of class 12 biology CBSE

Differentiate between homogeneous and heterogeneous class 12 chemistry CBSE

