Courses
Courses for Kids
Free study material
Offline Centres
More
Store Icon
Store
seo-qna
SearchIcon
banner

If frequency ($\upsilon > {\upsilon _0}$) of the incident light becomes $n$times the initial frequency ($\upsilon $) , the kinetic energy of the emitted photoelectrons becomes (${\upsilon _0}$is the threshold frequency)
A)$n$times of the initial kinetic energy.
B)more than $n$times of the initial kinetic energy.
C)Less than $n$times of the initial kinetic energy.
D)kinetic energy of the emitted photoelectron will remain unchanged.

Answer
VerifiedVerified
586.2k+ views
Hint: Einstein’s photoelectric equation tells us about the relation between the frequency of light used for emission of photoelectrons and the maximum kinetic energy of photoelectrons. Use this equation to deduce the expression.

Complete step by step solution:
Let the initial kinetic energy of the photoelectrons be $K$and the new kinetic energy of the photoelectrons be $K'$.
For the first case, it is given that the frequency of incident light is $\upsilon $. It is also given in the question that this frequency is greater than the threshold frequency of the surface which means that the photoelectric effect will take place. The threshold frequency is ${\upsilon _0}$.
C states that,
$K = h\upsilon - h{\upsilon _0}$
Where $h$is the Planks’ constant.
From this equation we can find the value of $h\upsilon $
$h\upsilon = K + h{\upsilon _0}$
Now, the frequency is changed to $n\upsilon $
Again,
By Einstein’s photoelectric equation,
$K' = nh\upsilon - h{\upsilon _0}$
Putting the value of $h\upsilon $in this equation, we get,
$K' = n\left( {K + h{\upsilon _0}} \right) - h{\upsilon _0}$
$K' = nK + nh{\upsilon _0} - h{\upsilon _0}$
$K' = nK + h{\upsilon _0}\left( {n - 1} \right)$
From this equation, we can clearly see that the final kinetic energy of photoelectrons is greater than $n$ times of initial kinetic energy.
B) is correct.

Note: From Einstein’s photoelectric equation, students generally think that the kinetic energy of photoelectrons is directly proportional to the frequency of the incident radiation which is completely wrong. This is because the frequency term in the equation is in summation with one more term(work function).