Question

Explain with an example how popular governments can be undemocratic and popular leaders can be autocratic?

Answer 1

Hint: The popular governments are probably undemocratic. It is because popularly elected governments can use their power and authority to control mass media methods such as newspapers and television to offer only positive information about the government's functioning.

Complete answer:
Zimbabwe has been governed by ZANU-PF, the party that led the freedom struggle, since its independence in 1980. Since then, its leader, Robert Mugabe, has been ruling the country. Elections were held on a regular basis, and ZANU-PF still won them. President Mugabe is successful, but in elections, he also utilizes discriminatory practices. His government has many times amended the constitution over the years to expand the President's authority and make him less accountable.
Opposition party workers are insulted and disrupted by their meetings. Public anti-government marches and demonstrations are considered illegal. A statute is in effect that restricts the freedom to criticize the President. Television and radio are government-controlled and offer only the version of the ruling party.
Zimbabwe's example shows that in a democracy, the rulers' widespread approval is necessary, but it is not sufficient. Popular governments can be undemocratic. Popular leaders could be autocratic.

Note: Elected governments can also use the control of the state for local and national planning elections. Opposition parties may be under pressure and may not be able to act independently. Often, the government could pressurize the judges to give a verdict in their favor.