
At the center of a fixed large circular coil of radius $R$, a much smaller circular coil of radius $r$ is placed. The two coils are concentric and are in the same plane. The larger coil carries a current $I$. The smaller coil is set to rotate with a constant angular velocity $\omega $ about an axis along their common diameter. Calculate the emf induced in the smaller coil after a time $t$ of its start of rotation.
A. $\dfrac{{{\mu _0}I}}{{2R}}\omega {r^2}\sin \omega t$
B. $\dfrac{{{\mu _0}I}}{{4R}}\omega \pi {r^2}\sin \omega t$
C. $\dfrac{{{\mu _0}I}}{{2R}}\omega \pi {r^2}\sin \omega t$
D. $\dfrac{{{\mu _0}I}}{{4R}}\omega {r^2}\sin \omega t$
Answer
565.8k+ views
Hint: First step will be to calculate the flux in touch with the smaller coil.
After its determination, we can find out the emf induced in it due to its rotation.
Formula used:
Flux in touch with the smaller coil: $\phi = \vec B.\vec A = BA\cos \theta $
Where $\phi $ is the change in magnetic flux in touch with the smaller coil and is expressed in Tesla $(T)$, $B$ is the intensity of magnetic field in touch with the smaller coil and is expressed in Webers $(W)$, $A$ is the area and is expressed in meter square $({m^2})$ and $\theta $ is the angle between the perpendicular area vector magnetic field and is expressed in radians $(rad)$.
Emf induced: $\varepsilon = - \dfrac{{d\phi }}{{dt}}$
Where $\varepsilon $ is the induced emf and is expressed in Volts $(V)$, \[d\phi \] is the change in magnetic flux in contact with the smaller coil and is expressed in Webers $(W)$ and $dt$ is the change in time and is expressed in seconds $(s)$.
Magnetic field induced by the larger coil: \[B = \dfrac{{{\mu _0}I}}{{2R}}\]
Where ${\mu _0}$ is the permittivity of vacuum \[(1approx)\], $I$ is the moment of inertia and is expressed I meter to the power four $({m^4})$ and $R$ is the radius of the outer coil and is expressed in meters $(m)$.
Complete step by step answer:
Due to the flow of current in the larger coil, a magnetic field $B$ will be produced around it. This field is in touch with the inner smaller coil which rotates with an angular velocity of $\omega $. Due to this continuous rotation there will be a change in the number of magnetic field force lines in contact with it. Therefore, a change in magnetic flux $d\phi $ will be observed with passage of time $dt$.
Now, value of magnetic flux in touch with the inner coil $ = \phi = \vec B.\vec A = BA\cos \theta $.
For our coil, the radius is and the angle $\theta $ is $\omega t$. Therefore the above expression becomes the following after substitution,
$\phi = BA\cos \theta = B\pi {r^2}\cos \omega t$
We know that the induced emf will be equal to the negative ratio of flux change with respect to time. That is, $\varepsilon = - \dfrac{{d\phi }}{{dt}}$.
Now, substituting the determined value of $\phi $ we get,
$\varepsilon = - \dfrac{{d\phi }}{{dt}} = - \dfrac{d}{{dt}}(B\pi {r^2}\cos \omega t)$.
But \[B = \dfrac{{{\mu _0}I}}{{2R}}\].
Therefore we get,
$\varepsilon = - \dfrac{d}{{dt}}(B\pi {r^2}\cos \omega t) = - \dfrac{d}{{dt}}(\dfrac{{{\mu _0}I}}{{2R}})(\pi {r^2}\cos \omega t)$
Upon differentiation we will get,
$\varepsilon = \dfrac{{{\mu _0}I}}{{2R}}\pi {r^2}\sin \omega t$.
So, the correct answer is “Option C”.
Note:
Emf induced is always a negative ratio of the change in flux with respect to time because the produced emf repels the cause that produces it. This is in accordance with Lenz’s Law. Therefore, it is always negative.
After its determination, we can find out the emf induced in it due to its rotation.
Formula used:
Flux in touch with the smaller coil: $\phi = \vec B.\vec A = BA\cos \theta $
Where $\phi $ is the change in magnetic flux in touch with the smaller coil and is expressed in Tesla $(T)$, $B$ is the intensity of magnetic field in touch with the smaller coil and is expressed in Webers $(W)$, $A$ is the area and is expressed in meter square $({m^2})$ and $\theta $ is the angle between the perpendicular area vector magnetic field and is expressed in radians $(rad)$.
Emf induced: $\varepsilon = - \dfrac{{d\phi }}{{dt}}$
Where $\varepsilon $ is the induced emf and is expressed in Volts $(V)$, \[d\phi \] is the change in magnetic flux in contact with the smaller coil and is expressed in Webers $(W)$ and $dt$ is the change in time and is expressed in seconds $(s)$.
Magnetic field induced by the larger coil: \[B = \dfrac{{{\mu _0}I}}{{2R}}\]
Where ${\mu _0}$ is the permittivity of vacuum \[(1approx)\], $I$ is the moment of inertia and is expressed I meter to the power four $({m^4})$ and $R$ is the radius of the outer coil and is expressed in meters $(m)$.
Complete step by step answer:
Due to the flow of current in the larger coil, a magnetic field $B$ will be produced around it. This field is in touch with the inner smaller coil which rotates with an angular velocity of $\omega $. Due to this continuous rotation there will be a change in the number of magnetic field force lines in contact with it. Therefore, a change in magnetic flux $d\phi $ will be observed with passage of time $dt$.
Now, value of magnetic flux in touch with the inner coil $ = \phi = \vec B.\vec A = BA\cos \theta $.
For our coil, the radius is and the angle $\theta $ is $\omega t$. Therefore the above expression becomes the following after substitution,
$\phi = BA\cos \theta = B\pi {r^2}\cos \omega t$
We know that the induced emf will be equal to the negative ratio of flux change with respect to time. That is, $\varepsilon = - \dfrac{{d\phi }}{{dt}}$.
Now, substituting the determined value of $\phi $ we get,
$\varepsilon = - \dfrac{{d\phi }}{{dt}} = - \dfrac{d}{{dt}}(B\pi {r^2}\cos \omega t)$.
But \[B = \dfrac{{{\mu _0}I}}{{2R}}\].
Therefore we get,
$\varepsilon = - \dfrac{d}{{dt}}(B\pi {r^2}\cos \omega t) = - \dfrac{d}{{dt}}(\dfrac{{{\mu _0}I}}{{2R}})(\pi {r^2}\cos \omega t)$
Upon differentiation we will get,
$\varepsilon = \dfrac{{{\mu _0}I}}{{2R}}\pi {r^2}\sin \omega t$.
So, the correct answer is “Option C”.
Note:
Emf induced is always a negative ratio of the change in flux with respect to time because the produced emf repels the cause that produces it. This is in accordance with Lenz’s Law. Therefore, it is always negative.
Recently Updated Pages
A man running at a speed 5 ms is viewed in the side class 12 physics CBSE

The number of solutions in x in 02pi for which sqrt class 12 maths CBSE

State and explain Hardy Weinbergs Principle class 12 biology CBSE

Write any two methods of preparation of phenol Give class 12 chemistry CBSE

Which of the following statements is wrong a Amnion class 12 biology CBSE

Differentiate between action potential and resting class 12 biology CBSE

Trending doubts
What are the major means of transport Explain each class 12 social science CBSE

Which are the Top 10 Largest Countries of the World?

Draw a labelled sketch of the human eye class 12 physics CBSE

How much time does it take to bleed after eating p class 12 biology CBSE

Explain sex determination in humans with line diag class 12 biology CBSE

Explain sex determination in humans with the help of class 12 biology CBSE

