Courses
Courses for Kids
Free study material
Offline Centres
More
Store Icon
Store
seo-qna
SearchIcon
banner

Which one of the following is a qualification for appointment as a judge of the Supreme Court?
(A) He should be a judge in some court
(B) He should have practiced law in any court
(C) He should have worked as a judge in a High Court for five years
(D) He should have worked as a judge in a subordinate court for ten years.

Answer
VerifiedVerified
495.9k+ views
Hint: The Supreme Court of India is the supreme judicial body of the govt. of India and additionally the very best court of India at a lower place in the constitution. It's the foremost senior constitutional court and has the flexibility to review.

Complete answer:
The Constitution seeks to make sure the independence of supreme court judges in varied ways. Per Article fifty of directive principles of state policy, the state shall take steps to separate the judiciary from the manager. Independence of the judiciary, the dominance of the constitution, and rule of law are the options of the essential structure of the Constitution. Per the constitution, as held by the court in the Three Judges Cases – (1982, 1993, 1998), an adjudicator is selected to the high court by the president on the suggestion of the collegium — a shut gathering of the Chief Justice of India, the four most senior adjudicators of the court and the senior-most appointed authority hailing from the high court of a planned deputy. This has brought about a Memorandum of Procedure being followed, for the arrangements. The Supreme Court of Asian countries includes justice and not in way over thirty completely different Judges chosen by the President of India. Tribunal Judges resign when achieving the age of sixty-five years. To be chosen as a decision of the Supreme Court, a private ought to be a resident of India and doubtless been, for at least 5 years, a decision of a tribunal or a minimum of 2 such Courts in progression, or an Advocate of a tribunal or a minimum of 2 such Courts in progression for in any event ten years or he ought to be, within the assessment of the President, a recognized law specialist.

Thus, option (C) is correct.

Note: President can eliminate an appointed authority on demonstrated rowdiness or insufficiency when parliament supports with a greater part of the complete participation of each house for prosecution and at the very least $66\% $ of the individuals from each house present.