Question

Which one of the following is a moral reason behind power-sharing?
(A) Power-sharing reduces the possibility of conflict.
(B) Power-sharing can reduce violence and instability.
(C) Power-sharing is in the very spirit of democracy.
(D) Power-sharing ensures the stability of political order.

Answer 1

Hint: Consociationalism is a procedure of power sharing in a democracy. Political scientists describe a consociationalism state as one which has chief internal separations along ethnic, religious, or linguistic lines, with none of the separations big enough to start a mainstream assemblage, but which continues to be steady owing to discussion among the leaders of these assemblages.

Complete answer:
Power sharing aids in tumbling the likelihood of dispute between social groups. Power sharing is a respectable way to safeguard the constancy of political order as social dispute frequently directs vehemence and political unpredictability. Enforcing the determination of the mainstream community over others may look like a pleasant choice in the short run, but in the long run it destabilizes the harmony of the country. Oppression of the mainstream is not only tyrannical for the marginal but it also brings decay to the mainstream. Dissimilar forms of power-sharing in modern democracies are:
Power sharing in a diverse form of Government.
Power sharing among numerous levels of Governments.
Power sharing among unalike social groups.
Power sharing among political parties, pressure groups and movements.

Thus, option (C) is correct.

Note: Critics point out that consociationalism is hazardous in an arrangement of opposing incompatible principles, usually liberalism and communism. They state that precise circumstances must exist for 3 or more groups to progress a multi- system with strong influence. This viewpoint is conquered by leaders, with those multitudes that are side-lined with the leaders having less to lose if warfare breaks out. Consociationalism cannot be really pragmatic.