Question

Which one among the following is the basis of difference between the Parliamentary and Presidential system of government?
A) Power of judicial review
B) Method of election of President/ plead of the State
C) Legislative supremacy in law making
D) Relation between the legislature and the executive

Answer 1

Hint:
It alludes to a principle highlight of the Parliamentary System of Government.
Here, the Prime Minister alongside the Council of Ministers structure the leader and the Parliament is the lawmaking body. The PM and the priests are chosen from the individuals from parliament, inferring that the chief arises out of the assembly.


Complete step by step solution:
The significant contrast between these two frameworks is that in a Presidential framework, the chief, the President, is straightforwardly casted a ballot upon by the individuals (Or by means of a body chose explicitly to choose the president, and no other reason), The President is ostensible top of the state in a Parliamentary type of government. He is chosen not legitimately by individuals yet individuals from the discretionary school as per the arrangement of corresponding portrayal by methods for a solitary adaptable vote.
In the Presidential System, it is more hard to sanction enactment, particularly if the President has unexpected convictions in comparison to the administrative body. The President just reacts to the individuals, the administrative branch can't generally effectively undermine the President. Therefore, he can make it more hard for the authoritative body to do anything.
In the Parliamentary framework, if the Parliament doesn't care for the Prime Minister, they can make a choice of no certainty and supplant him. This will in general make the chief docile to the Parliament.

Hence, the correct answer is option D.

Additional information :
There are more parliamentary types of government on the planet than there are administrations. In this framework, the parliament is commonly preeminent and the chief is mindful of the governing body. It is otherwise called the Cabinet type of government and furthermore 'Dependable Government'.


Note:
The significant contrast between these two frameworks is that in a Presidential framework, the chief, the President, is straightforwardly casted a ballot upon by the individuals (Or by means of a body chose explicitly to choose the president, and no other reason), The President is ostensible top of the state in a Parliamentary type of government. He is chosen not legitimately by individuals yet individuals from the discretionary school as per the arrangement of corresponding portrayal by methods for a solitary adaptable vote.
In the Presidential System, it is more hard to sanction enactment, particularly if the President has unexpected convictions in comparison to the administrative body. The President just reacts to the individuals, the administrative branch can't generally effectively undermine the President. Therefore, he can make it more hard for the authoritative body to do anything.
In the Parliamentary framework, if the Parliament doesn't care for the Prime Minister, they can make a choice of no certainty and supplant him. This will in general make the chief docile to the Parliament.