The first minimum of the interference pattern of a monochromatic light of wavelength $\lambda $ for a single slit of width $a$, occurs at an angle of $\dfrac{\lambda }{a}$. At the same angle of $\dfrac{\lambda }{a}$ we get a maximum for two narrow slits separated by the distance $a$. Explain.
Answer
593.7k+ views
Hint:-Find the path difference between two secondary wavelets. When the $\theta $ is very small, the diffraction pattern becomes minimum. Then, we have to find the resultant intensity.
Complete step by step answer:
According to the question, it is given that the width of the slit is $a$.
Now, the path difference between two secondary wavelets can be given by –
$n\lambda = a\sin \theta \cdots \left( 1 \right)$
Since, the $\theta $ is very small –
$\therefore \sin \theta \approx \theta $
For the first order diffraction, $n = 1$
So, putting this value of $n$ and $\sin \theta \approx \theta $ in equation $\left( 1 \right)$, we get –
$\lambda = a\theta $
So, the above equation can be written in terms of angle as –
$\theta = \dfrac{\lambda }{a}$
We know that, $\theta $ is very small so, -
$\theta = 0$
Therefore, the diffraction pattern becomes minimum.
In the case of interference, for two interfering waves of intensity ${I_1}$ and ${I_2}$. We should have two slits separated by the distance.
Therefore, we have to calculate the resultant intensity. So, this can be done as –
$I = {I_1} + {I_2} + 2\sqrt {{I_1}{I_2}\cos \theta } \cdots \left( 2 \right)$
We know that, $\theta = 0\left( {nearly} \right)$ which corresponds to an angle $\dfrac{\lambda }{a}$
$\therefore \cos \theta = 1$
Putting this value in equation $\left( 2 \right)$, we get –
$
I = {I_1} + {I_2} + 2\sqrt {{I_1}{I_2}\cos 0} \\
I = {I_1} + {I_2} + 2\sqrt {{I_1}{I_2}} \\
$
From the above equation, we can conclude that the resultant intensity is the sum of two intensities, there is a maxima which corresponds to the angle $\dfrac{\lambda }{a}$.
This is the reason why at the same angle $\dfrac{\lambda }{a}$ we get the maximum for two narrow slits which are separated by distance $a$.
Note: When the coherent sources of waves have the same wavelength, frequency and same phase difference. Then, the resultant intensity can be expressed as –
$I = {I_1} + {I_2} + 2\sqrt {{I_1}{I_2}\cos \theta } $
When the waves are superimposed and interference is constructive then, resultant intensity becomes maximum and can be expressed as –
$I = \sqrt {{{\left( {{I_1} + {I_2}} \right)}^2}} $
For destructive interference, the resultant intensity can be expressed as –
$I = \sqrt {{{\left( {{I_1} - {I_2}} \right)}^2}} $
Complete step by step answer:
According to the question, it is given that the width of the slit is $a$.
Now, the path difference between two secondary wavelets can be given by –
$n\lambda = a\sin \theta \cdots \left( 1 \right)$
Since, the $\theta $ is very small –
$\therefore \sin \theta \approx \theta $
For the first order diffraction, $n = 1$
So, putting this value of $n$ and $\sin \theta \approx \theta $ in equation $\left( 1 \right)$, we get –
$\lambda = a\theta $
So, the above equation can be written in terms of angle as –
$\theta = \dfrac{\lambda }{a}$
We know that, $\theta $ is very small so, -
$\theta = 0$
Therefore, the diffraction pattern becomes minimum.
In the case of interference, for two interfering waves of intensity ${I_1}$ and ${I_2}$. We should have two slits separated by the distance.
Therefore, we have to calculate the resultant intensity. So, this can be done as –
$I = {I_1} + {I_2} + 2\sqrt {{I_1}{I_2}\cos \theta } \cdots \left( 2 \right)$
We know that, $\theta = 0\left( {nearly} \right)$ which corresponds to an angle $\dfrac{\lambda }{a}$
$\therefore \cos \theta = 1$
Putting this value in equation $\left( 2 \right)$, we get –
$
I = {I_1} + {I_2} + 2\sqrt {{I_1}{I_2}\cos 0} \\
I = {I_1} + {I_2} + 2\sqrt {{I_1}{I_2}} \\
$
From the above equation, we can conclude that the resultant intensity is the sum of two intensities, there is a maxima which corresponds to the angle $\dfrac{\lambda }{a}$.
This is the reason why at the same angle $\dfrac{\lambda }{a}$ we get the maximum for two narrow slits which are separated by distance $a$.
Note: When the coherent sources of waves have the same wavelength, frequency and same phase difference. Then, the resultant intensity can be expressed as –
$I = {I_1} + {I_2} + 2\sqrt {{I_1}{I_2}\cos \theta } $
When the waves are superimposed and interference is constructive then, resultant intensity becomes maximum and can be expressed as –
$I = \sqrt {{{\left( {{I_1} + {I_2}} \right)}^2}} $
For destructive interference, the resultant intensity can be expressed as –
$I = \sqrt {{{\left( {{I_1} - {I_2}} \right)}^2}} $
Recently Updated Pages
Master Class 11 Social Science: Engaging Questions & Answers for Success

Master Class 11 Physics: Engaging Questions & Answers for Success

Master Class 11 Maths: Engaging Questions & Answers for Success

Master Class 11 Economics: Engaging Questions & Answers for Success

Master Class 11 Computer Science: Engaging Questions & Answers for Success

Master Class 11 Chemistry: Engaging Questions & Answers for Success

Trending doubts
One Metric ton is equal to kg A 10000 B 1000 C 100 class 11 physics CBSE

There are 720 permutations of the digits 1 2 3 4 5 class 11 maths CBSE

1 Quintal is equal to a 110 kg b 10 kg c 100kg d 1000 class 11 physics CBSE

State and prove Bernoullis theorem class 11 physics CBSE

Difference Between Prokaryotic Cells and Eukaryotic Cells

Which among the following are examples of coming together class 11 social science CBSE

