Courses
Courses for Kids
Free study material
Offline Centres
More
Store Icon
Store
seo-qna
SearchIcon
banner

The distances of a point on the screen from two slits in a biprism experiment is $1.8 \times {10^{ - 5}}m$ and $1.23 \times {10^{ - 5}}m$. If wavelength of light used is $6000\mathop A\limits^o $ , then fringe formed at that point is
A. \[10th\] bright
B. \[10th\] dark
C. \[9th\]bright
D. \[9th\]dark

Answer
VerifiedVerified
484.2k+ views
Hint: This is a question of interference. First calculate the path difference. Then, use the path difference and see whether it fits in the formula of maxima or in the formula of minima. Finally calculate the position of the minima or the position of maxima, whichever is applicable.

Complete step by step answer:
Path difference is the difference in lengths of path given. We need to subtract the two path lengths given in question. Here given the path lengths are $1.23 \times {10^{ - 5}}m$ and $1.8 \times {10^{ - 5}}m$
The path difference here is $\Delta x = 0.57 \times {10^{ - 5}}m$
For maxima or bright fringe, $\Delta x = n\lambda $
For minima or dark fringe, $\Delta x = \dfrac{{2n - 1}}{2}\lambda $
Given wavelength of light used is $6000\mathop A\limits^o $
For bright fringe,
$
  0.57 \times {10^{ - 5}}m = n\lambda \\
  n = \dfrac{{0.57 \times {{10}^{ - 5}}}}{{6000 \times {{10}^{ - 10}}}} = 9.5 \\
 $
Which is not a whole number. Thus no bright fringe can be obtained from the given path length and wavelength
For dark fringe,
\[
  0.57 \times {10^{ - 5}}m = \dfrac{{2n - 1}}{2}\lambda \\
  n = \dfrac{1}{2}\left( {\dfrac{{2 \times 0.57 \times {{10}^{ - 5}}}}{{6000 \times {{10}^{ - 10}}}} + 1} \right) \\
  n = 10 \\
\]
Thus the \[10th\] dark fringe is obtained.

So, the correct answer is “Option B”.

Note:
Students should know that sometimes the path difference can be directly calculated and directly checked for maxima and minima. Also avoid making mistakes in doing big calculations. Sometimes you need to approximate while doing calculations. Since, $\Delta x = \dfrac{{2n - 1}}{2}\lambda $we used thus the value of $n$ starts from $1$ . If we use $\Delta x = \dfrac{{2n + 1}}{2}\lambda $then the value of $n$ will start from $0$ . So we need to add one to the calculated value of $n$ . Students generally make mistakes in this.