Courses
Courses for Kids
Free study material
Offline Centres
More
Store Icon
Store
seo-qna
SearchIcon
banner

The compound proposition which is always false is \[\]
A.$\left( p\to q \right)\leftrightarrow \left( \tilde{\ }q\to \tilde{\ }p \right)$\[\]
B.$\left[ \left( p\to q \right)\wedge \left( q\to r \right) \right]\leftrightarrow \left( p\to r \right)$\[\]
C. $\left( \tilde{\ }p\vee q \right)\leftrightarrow \left( p\to \tilde{\ }q \right)$\[\]
D. $p\to \tilde{\ }p$\[\]

Answer
VerifiedVerified
483.3k+ views
Hint: We use the definitions of negation $\tilde{\ }p$, conjunction $p\wedge q$, disjunction $p\vee q$, implication $p\to q$ and bi-implication $p\leftrightarrow q$ to find the truth values of compositions within the brackets if there is in each option and then the whole composite statement.

Complete step-by-step solution:
We know from the mathematical logic that if the statement $p$ has a truth value T or F then the negation of $p$ is denoted as $\tilde{\ }p$ and has truth value F or T respectively. The through the table of $\tilde{\ }p$ is given as
$p$$\tilde{\ }p$
TF
FT

We also know that when there are two statements $p$ and $q$, the statement with the conjunction (with logical connective AND) of their truth values is denoted as $p\wedge q$ and has a truth value T only when both $p$ and $q$ have truth values, T, otherwise false. The truth table of $p\wedge q$ is
$p$$q$$p\wedge q$
TTT
TFF
FTF
FFF

The statement with disjunction (with logical connective OR) of their truth values are denoted as $p\hat{\ }q$ and has a truth value T only when one of $p$ and $q$ have truth value T, otherwise false. The truth table of $p\vee q$ is
$p$$q$$p\vee q$
TTT
TFT
FTT
FFF

The statement with the implication (with logical connective If...then...) of their truth values is denoted as $p\to q$ and has a truth value F only when one of $p$ has a truth value T and $q$ has a truth value $F$ otherwise true. The truth table of $p\to q$ is
$p$$q$$p\to q$
TTT
TFF
FTT
FFT

 The statement with bi-implication (with logical connective if and only if ) of their truth values is denoted as $p\leftrightarrow q$ and has a truth value T only when both $p$ and $q$ have truth value T or truth value $F$, otherwise true. The truth table of $p\leftrightarrow q$ is
$p$$q$$p\leftrightarrow q$
TTT
TFF
FTF
FFT

We use all these definitions to get the truth values in each option. We first find the truth values inside the bracket and then we find the truth values of whole composite statements. Let us denote the resultant statement in each option as $s$.\[\]
The truth table for option A: $s=\left( p\to q \right)\leftrightarrow \left( \tilde{\ }q\to \tilde{\ }p \right)$.
$p$$q$$\tilde{\ }p$$\tilde{\ }q$$p\to q$$\tilde{\ }q\to \tilde{\ }p$s
TTFFTTT
TFFTFFT
FTTFTTT
FFTTTTT

So option A is not correct. Let us move to option-B where three statements are involved . So let $t=\left( p\to q \right)\wedge \left( q\to r \right)$ , $s=\left[ \left( p\to q \right)\wedge \left( q\to r \right) \right]\to \left( p\to r \right)=t\to \left( p\to r \right)$ and draw the truth table .
$p$$q$$r$$p\to q$$q\to r$$p\to r$$t$$s$
TTTTTTTT
TTFTTTTF
TFTFTFFT
TFFFTFFT
FTTTFTFT
FTFTFTFT
FFTTTTTT
FFFTTTTT

So option B is not correct. We move to option C where $s=\left( \tilde{\ }p\vee q \right)\leftrightarrow \left( p\to \tilde{\ }q \right)$
$p$$q$$\tilde{\ }p$$\tilde{\ }q$$\tilde{\ }p\vee q$$p\wedge \tilde{\ }q$s
TTFFTFF
TFFTFTF
FTTFTFF
FFTTTFF

So option C is correct . We move to option D where $s=p\to \tilde{\ }p$
$p$$\tilde{\ }p$$p\to \tilde{\ }p$
TFT
FTF

So the only correct option is C. \[\]

Note: If the composite statement is always true then it is called a tautology and if the composite statement is always false it is called a fallacy. The statement $\tilde{\ }q\to \tilde{\ }p$ is the contrapositive of $p\to q$ and $q\to p$ is the converse of $p\to q$.