Question

The chairperson and members of the State Human Rights Commission are appointed by the ________________
(A) President
(B) Prime Minister
(C) Governor
(D) Chief Minister

Answer 1

Hint: A State Government may institute a body recognized as the Human Rights Commission of that State to practice the authorities deliberated upon, and to accomplish the functions allocated to, a State Commission. In agreement to the amendment taken in TPHRA,1993 point No. 10 below is the list of State Human Rights Commissions shaped to accomplish the functions of the dictate as specified under chapter V of TPHRA,1993 (with amendment act 2006).

Complete answer:
The Governors of the states of India have parallel influences and resolutions at the state level as those of the President of India at the Union level. Governors subsist in the states while lieutenant-governors or commissioners subsist in union territories counting the National Capital Territory of Delhi. The governor acts as the trifling head while the actual authority lies with the Chief Ministers of the states and his/her councils of ministers. Though, in union territories, the concrete authority lies with the lieutenant governor or commissioner, not including in NCT of Delhi, Puducherry, and Jammu and Kashmir where he/she apportions influence with a council of ministers controlled by a chief minister. In India, a lieutenant governor is in the domination of a union territory. Yet, the ranking is present only in the union territories of Andaman and Nicobar Islands, Ladakh, Jammu and Kashmir, Delhi, and Puducherry (the additional territories have a commissioner fixed, who is typically an IAS officer or a superannuated judge of a court). Nevertheless, the governor of Punjab acts as the overseer of Chandigarh. Lieutenant governors do not hold a similar position as a governor of a state in the list of superiority.

Thus, option (C) is correct.

Note: While the President of India is "elected", the governor is "nominated" by the obligatory central government. That is why there have been numerous occurrences when governors chosen by a preceding government are eliminated by a succeeding government. The explanations are more political. The Supreme Court has reigned that governors should be prearranged with the safekeeping of term but this is usually not stuck to.