
Test whether the relation \[{{R}_{3}}\] is
(i) Reflexive (ii) Symmetric and (iii) Transitive
where \[{{R}_{3}}\] on R defined by \[(a,b)\in {{R}_{3}}\Leftrightarrow {{a}^{2}}-4ab+3{{b}^{2}}=0\]
Answer
615.3k+ views
Hint: We will use the definitions of reflexive, symmetric and transitive relations to solve this question. A relation is a reflexive relation If every element of set A maps to itself. A relation in a set A is a symmetric relation if \[({{a}_{1}},{{a}_{2}})\in R\] implies that \[({{a}_{2}},{{a}_{1}})\in R\], for all \[{{a}_{1}},{{a}_{2}}\in A\]. A relation in a set A is a transitive relation if \[({{a}_{1}},{{a}_{2}})\in R\] and \[({{a}_{2}},{{a}_{1}})\in R\] implies that \[({{a}_{1}},{{a}_{3}})\in R\] for all \[{{a}_{1}},{{a}_{2}},{{a}_{3}}\in A\].
Complete step-by-step answer:
Before proceeding with the question we should know about the concept of relations and different types of relations that are reflexive, symmetric and transitive relations.
A relation in set A is a subset of \[A\times A\]. Thus, \[A\times A\] is two extreme relations.
A relation in a set A is a reflexive relation if \[(a,a)\in R\], for every \[a\in A\].
A relation in a set A is a symmetric relation if \[({{a}_{1}},{{a}_{2}})\in R\] implies that \[({{a}_{2}},{{a}_{1}})\in R\], for all \[{{a}_{1}},{{a}_{2}}\in A\].
A relation in a set A is a transitive relation if \[({{a}_{1}},{{a}_{2}})\in R\] and \[({{a}_{2}},{{a}_{1}})\in R\] implies that \[({{a}_{1}},{{a}_{3}})\in R\] for all \[{{a}_{1}},{{a}_{2}},{{a}_{3}}\in A\].
A relation in a set A is an equivalence relation if R is reflexive, symmetric and transitive.
Now let’s check for reflexivity. Assuming a to be an arbitrary element of \[{{R}_{3}}\].
Then, \[a\in {{R}_{3}}\Leftrightarrow {{a}^{2}}-4a\times a+3{{a}^{2}}=0\]. Hence it is reflexive.
Now moving on to symmetry. Let \[(a,b)\in {{R}_{3}}\Leftrightarrow {{a}^{2}}-4ab+3{{b}^{2}}=0\]. But \[{{b}^{2}}-4ba+3{{a}^{2}}\ne 0\] for all \[(a,b)\in R\]. Thus it is not symmetric.
Finally, checking for transitivity. Let \[(a,b)\in {{R}_{3}}\] and \[(b,c)\in {{R}_{3}}\]. So substituting \[(a,b)\in {{R}_{3}}\] we get \[{{a}^{2}}-4ab+3{{b}^{2}}\] and by substituting \[(b,c)\in {{R}_{3}}\] we get \[{{b}^{2}}-4bc+3{{c}^{2}}\]. And substituting \[(a,c)\in {{R}_{3}}\] we get \[{{a}^{2}}-4ac+3{{c}^{2}}\]. Hence it is not transitive.
Thus \[(a,b)\in {{R}_{3}}\Leftrightarrow {{a}^{2}}-4ab+3{{b}^{2}}=0\] is only reflexive.
Note: Remembering the definition of relations and the types of relations is the key here. We in a hurry can make a mistake in thinking it as a symmetric set but on substituting (b, a) we get a different relation.
Complete step-by-step answer:
Before proceeding with the question we should know about the concept of relations and different types of relations that are reflexive, symmetric and transitive relations.
A relation in set A is a subset of \[A\times A\]. Thus, \[A\times A\] is two extreme relations.
A relation in a set A is a reflexive relation if \[(a,a)\in R\], for every \[a\in A\].
A relation in a set A is a symmetric relation if \[({{a}_{1}},{{a}_{2}})\in R\] implies that \[({{a}_{2}},{{a}_{1}})\in R\], for all \[{{a}_{1}},{{a}_{2}}\in A\].
A relation in a set A is a transitive relation if \[({{a}_{1}},{{a}_{2}})\in R\] and \[({{a}_{2}},{{a}_{1}})\in R\] implies that \[({{a}_{1}},{{a}_{3}})\in R\] for all \[{{a}_{1}},{{a}_{2}},{{a}_{3}}\in A\].
A relation in a set A is an equivalence relation if R is reflexive, symmetric and transitive.
Now let’s check for reflexivity. Assuming a to be an arbitrary element of \[{{R}_{3}}\].
Then, \[a\in {{R}_{3}}\Leftrightarrow {{a}^{2}}-4a\times a+3{{a}^{2}}=0\]. Hence it is reflexive.
Now moving on to symmetry. Let \[(a,b)\in {{R}_{3}}\Leftrightarrow {{a}^{2}}-4ab+3{{b}^{2}}=0\]. But \[{{b}^{2}}-4ba+3{{a}^{2}}\ne 0\] for all \[(a,b)\in R\]. Thus it is not symmetric.
Finally, checking for transitivity. Let \[(a,b)\in {{R}_{3}}\] and \[(b,c)\in {{R}_{3}}\]. So substituting \[(a,b)\in {{R}_{3}}\] we get \[{{a}^{2}}-4ab+3{{b}^{2}}\] and by substituting \[(b,c)\in {{R}_{3}}\] we get \[{{b}^{2}}-4bc+3{{c}^{2}}\]. And substituting \[(a,c)\in {{R}_{3}}\] we get \[{{a}^{2}}-4ac+3{{c}^{2}}\]. Hence it is not transitive.
Thus \[(a,b)\in {{R}_{3}}\Leftrightarrow {{a}^{2}}-4ab+3{{b}^{2}}=0\] is only reflexive.
Note: Remembering the definition of relations and the types of relations is the key here. We in a hurry can make a mistake in thinking it as a symmetric set but on substituting (b, a) we get a different relation.
Recently Updated Pages
Basicity of sulphurous acid and sulphuric acid are

Master Class 10 English: Engaging Questions & Answers for Success

Master Class 10 Social Science: Engaging Questions & Answers for Success

Master Class 10 Computer Science: Engaging Questions & Answers for Success

Class 10 Question and Answer - Your Ultimate Solutions Guide

Master Class 10 General Knowledge: Engaging Questions & Answers for Success

Trending doubts
Who is known as the "Little Master" in Indian cricket history?

A boat goes 24 km upstream and 28 km downstream in class 10 maths CBSE

State and explain Ohms law class 10 physics CBSE

Distinguish between soap and detergent class 10 chemistry CBSE

a Why did Mendel choose pea plants for his experiments class 10 biology CBSE

Draw the diagram of the sectional view of the human class 10 biology CBSE

