
State whether the sentence is true (T) or false (F):
Hindu Succession Amendment Act, 2005 gave equal rights to daughters.
A.True
B. False
Answer
540.9k+ views
Hint: The Hindu Succession Act 1956 was amended in 2005 to remove gender discriminatory provisions from it.
The amendment aimed to end gender discrimination in Mitakshara coparcenary by including daughters in the system as a coparcener.
Complete answer:
Hindu Succession Act 1956 was amended in 2005 to remove gender discriminatory provisions of it and to give equal rights to daughters in Hindu Mitakshara coparcenary property as that of the sons. The act (Hindu succession amendment act 2005) aimed at making two major changes in the Hindu Succession Act 1956.
It amended the clause that stated daughters were excluded from being a coparcener and the second is, it omitted section 23 of the act which stated that a female child will not be treated as a part of a succession of a property owned by her family.
Effect of Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act 2005
This amendment has drastically changed the position of women in society in a better manner. It gave equal rights to daughters as that to the sons in property and reduced gender discrimination against women. The daughter is also a coparcener in the Hindu joint family therefore she can also ask for partition.
Hence, the correct answer is option (A)
Note: It was held in Danamma V. Amar that a daughter is entitled to an equal share as a son in ancestral property, including a daughter born before the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 came into force.
Clarifying further, the bench added that the marriage of the daughter makes no difference to this position.
The amendment aimed to end gender discrimination in Mitakshara coparcenary by including daughters in the system as a coparcener.
Complete answer:
Hindu Succession Act 1956 was amended in 2005 to remove gender discriminatory provisions of it and to give equal rights to daughters in Hindu Mitakshara coparcenary property as that of the sons. The act (Hindu succession amendment act 2005) aimed at making two major changes in the Hindu Succession Act 1956.
It amended the clause that stated daughters were excluded from being a coparcener and the second is, it omitted section 23 of the act which stated that a female child will not be treated as a part of a succession of a property owned by her family.
Effect of Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act 2005
This amendment has drastically changed the position of women in society in a better manner. It gave equal rights to daughters as that to the sons in property and reduced gender discrimination against women. The daughter is also a coparcener in the Hindu joint family therefore she can also ask for partition.
Hence, the correct answer is option (A)
Note: It was held in Danamma V. Amar that a daughter is entitled to an equal share as a son in ancestral property, including a daughter born before the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 came into force.
Clarifying further, the bench added that the marriage of the daughter makes no difference to this position.
Recently Updated Pages
Master Class 11 Business Studies: Engaging Questions & Answers for Success

Master Class 11 English: Engaging Questions & Answers for Success

Master Class 11 Computer Science: Engaging Questions & Answers for Success

Master Class 11 Social Science: Engaging Questions & Answers for Success

Master Class 11 Maths: Engaging Questions & Answers for Success

Master Class 11 Biology: Engaging Questions & Answers for Success

Trending doubts
Differentiate between an exothermic and an endothermic class 11 chemistry CBSE

10 examples of friction in our daily life

One Metric ton is equal to kg A 10000 B 1000 C 100 class 11 physics CBSE

Difference Between Prokaryotic Cells and Eukaryotic Cells

State the laws of reflection of light

Explain zero factorial class 11 maths CBSE

