Courses
Courses for Kids
Free study material
Offline Centres
More
Store Icon
Store
seo-qna
SearchIcon
banner

How do you prove that the limit of \[\left( {{x^2} - 1} \right) = 3\;\] as $x$ approaches -2 using the epsilon delta proof?

Answer
VerifiedVerified
528.9k+ views
Hint:
Epsilon data proof:
In calculus, the $\varepsilon - \delta $ definition of a limit is an algebraically precise formulation of evaluating the limit of a function. The definition states that a limit $L$ of a function at a point${x_0}$exists if no matter how ${x_0}$ ​ is approached, the values returned by the function will always approach $L$.
Such that it can be written mathematically as:
Let $f\left( x \right)$be a function defined on an open interval around${x_0}$. Such that we can say that the limit of $f\left( x \right)$as$x$ approaches ${x_0}$is\[L\].
$\mathop {\lim }\limits_{x \to {x_0}} f\left( x \right) = L$
Now for every $\varepsilon > 0$ there exists $\delta > 0$ such that for all$x$.
$0 < \left| {x - {x_0}} \right| < \delta \Rightarrow \left| {f\left( x \right) - L} \right| < \varepsilon $
By using the above definitions and formulas we can solve the given question.

Complete step by step solution:
Given
The limit of \[\left( {{x^2} - 1} \right) = 3\;{\text{\;as }}x{\text{ approaches }} - 2.......................\left( i \right)\]
So we need to prove the given statement using the epsilon delta proof.
For that we know that:
Now for every $\varepsilon > 0$ there exists $\delta > 0$ such that for all$x$.
$0 < \left| {x - {x_0}} \right| < \delta \Rightarrow \left| {f\left( x \right) - L} \right| < \varepsilon $
Here${x_0} = - 2$, so we can write:
\[0 < \left| {x + 2} \right| < \delta \;\mid \Rightarrow \left| {({x^2} - 1) - 3} \right| < \varepsilon .......................\left( {ii} \right)\]
Now in order to find the limit we need to manipulate the term \[\left| {({x^2} - 1) - 3} \right| < \varepsilon \] to find the value of \[\left| {x + 2} \right| < \]:
So we can write:
\[
  \left| {({x^2} - 1) - 3} \right| < \varepsilon \\
  \left| {{x^2} - 4} \right| < \varepsilon \\
  \left| {\left( {x + 2} \right)\left( {x - 2} \right)} \right| < \varepsilon \\
  \left| {\left( {x + 2} \right)} \right| < \dfrac{\varepsilon }{{\left( {x - 2} \right)}} \\
 \]
Now we know that we cannot have a $x$ term with \[\varepsilon \].
Let us assume \[\delta = 1\;\] and then solve \[x + 2\;\].
Such that:

\[
  0 < \left| {x + 2} \right| < 1 \\
   - 1 < x + 2 < 1 \\
   - 1 - 4 < x + 2 - 4 < 1 - 4 \\
   - 5 < x - 2 < - 3.......................\left( {iii} \right) \\
 \]
Now on analyzing (iii) if we chose the smaller value, the -5 would not be included, so let:
\[
  \left| {x - 2} \right| < 5 \\
  \therefore \left| {x - 2} \right| < \dfrac{\varepsilon }{5}.......................\left( {iv} \right) \\
 \]
Now from (ii) we can write:
For every $\varepsilon > 0$ there exists $\delta > 0$ such that for all$x$.
\[0 < \left| {x + 2} \right| < \delta \;\mid \Rightarrow \left| {({x^2} - 1) - 3} \right| < \varepsilon \]
Also we have got
$0 < \left| {x + 2} \right| < \delta \;\;{\text{and}}\;\delta {\text{ = min}}\left( {1,\dfrac{\varepsilon }{5}} \right)$
Such that (ii) can be written as:
\[
  0 < \left| {x + 2} \right| < \dfrac{\varepsilon }{5} \\
  0 < 5\left| {x + 2} \right| < \varepsilon \\
  0 < \left| {x - 2} \right|\left| {x + 2} \right| < \varepsilon \\
  0 < \left| {{x^2} - 4} \right| < \varepsilon \\
  0 < \left| {\left( {{x^2} - 1} \right) - 3} \right| < \varepsilon \\
  \therefore \mathop {\lim }\limits_{x \to - 2} \left( {{x^2} - 1} \right) = 3...........................\left( v \right) \\
 \]

Hence the proved limit of \[\left( {{x^2} - 1} \right) = 3\;\] as $x$ approaches -2 using the epsilon delta proof.

Note:
Also while approaching a question involving proofs one should keep in mind that one should work with one side at a time and manipulate it to the other side. The most straightforward way to do this is to simplify one side to the other directly, but we can also transform both sides to a common expression if we see no direct way to connect the two.