Question

Of the following which is not the salient feature of Indian constitution?
(a) Fundamental Rights
(b) Directive principles of state policy
(c) Supreme Court
(d) Presidential type of government

Answer 1

Hint: The Fundamental Rights are fused in the Indian Constitution in Part-III, Articles 12 to 35. Articles 39-51 contain the order standards. India has a solitary bound together legal executive with the Supreme Court at the summit and High Courts and Subordinate Courts beneath it.

Complete step-by-step solution:
The constitution is an archive that directs the path to all the organizations of a nation. The wide range of various laws and customs of the nation should adjust to it to be substantial. The Constitution of India was implemented on January 26, 1950, which contained 395 Articles, 8 timetables, and 22 sections. It is the lengthiest composed constitution on the planet. As of now, the Constitution contains 448 articles, 25 sections, and 12 timetables. India has a parliamentary type of government where the ability to make and execute laws is held by the Parliament. The President of India is just a Constitutional head. The genuine forces are delighted in by the Prime Minister who is helped by the Council of Ministers.
The Constitution of India has decided on the British parliamentary system of government instead of the American Presidential System of Government. The parliamentary framework depends on the standard of participation and coordination between the administrative and leader organs; the official framework depends on the principle of partition of forces between the two organs. The parliamentary framework is otherwise called the 'Westminster' model of government, mindful government, and bureau government. The Constitution builds up the parliamentary framework at the Center as well as in the states.

Thus, option (D) is correct.

Note: Disintegration of the Lower House (Lok Sabha or Assembly). Indian Parliamentary System is to a great extent dependent on the British example, there are some principal contrasts between the two. The Indian Parliament is definitely not a sovereign body like the British Parliament. The Indian State has a chosen head (republic) while the British State has a genetic head (government). In a parliamentary framework whether in India or Britain, the role of the Prime Minister has become so critical and vital that the political researchers like to consider it a 'Prime Ministerial Government'.