Question

Mewat is one of the most backward areas in Haryana. It used to be a part of district Gurgaon and Faridabad. The people of Mewat felt that the area will get better attention if it were to become a separate district. But political parties were indifferent to this sentiment. The demand for a separate district was raised by Mewat Educational and Social Organisation and Mewat Saksharta Samiti in 1996. Later Mewat Vikas Sabha was founded in 2000 and carried out a series of public awareness campaigns. This forced both the major parties, Congress and the Indian National Lok Dal, to announce their support for the new district before the assembly elections held in February 2005. The new district came into existence in July 2005. In this example what is the relationship that you observe among movement, political parties, and the government? Can you think of an example that shows a relationship different from this one?

Answer 1

Hint: The Indian society is enveloped by caste, race, religion, dialects, districts, and so forth and these have been profoundly delineated. There are significantly imbued social and economic differences. Democratic movements expect to make a social arrangement of equality. Notwithstanding, counter-social developments are additionally present, which contradict these endeavors and do whatever is conceivable to uphold the norm.

Complete answer:
From the case of Mewat, we can gather that the movements take up issues that have been disregarded by political politics. Ideological groups may then be impacted by these requests when they frame their own manifestoes. At last, the gathering which reaches power winds up executing steps that satisfy these requests.
The six-year-long Assam development (1979-1985), drove by the All Assam Students Union (AASU), was pointed against the penetration of outsiders from Bangladesh into Assam. Toward the finish of this development, the state gathering was disintegrated, the public authority was excused, and new decisions were held. The Asom Gana Parishad, framed out of the AASU, challenged and won the races, shaping the Government of Assam. In this model, we see an ideological group being shaped out of a weight gathering, which at that point proceeds to frame the public authority.

Note: The notable Assam movement was one of the widely acclaimed developments in post-independence India. It was essentially driven by students of Assam. This development began in 1979 under the authority of All Assam Students Union (AASU) and the All Assam Gana Sangram Parishad (AAGSP) and was formally wrapped up on 15 August 1985. In the wake of coming to comprehension with the Government of India, and signing an MoU, prevalently known as the Assam Accord 1985 that movement was called off.