Question

In case of electoral malpractice, who has the power to declare the election of the member invalid?
(A) Chief Election Commissioner
(B) Returning Officer
(C) Supreme Court
(D) Supreme Court or High Court

Answer 1

Hint: Election malfunction and negligence present substantial, yet particular, dangers to the political decision measure. Albeit all poll help programming can in a roundabout way address misrepresentation and negligence weaknesses, election administrators and other key partners have a significant obligation to proactively and straightforwardly address the uprightness of the political poll measure.

Complete answer:
The Constitution furnishes the Election Commission of India with the intensity of heading, administration, and control of races to parliament, state councils, the office of the leader of India, and the office of Vice President of India. The Election Commission is an all-India body that is common to both the Central government and the State governments. It should be noted here that the commission doesn't manage the decisions to the Municipalities and Panchayats in the states. Subsequently, a different State Election Commission is given by the Constitution of India.
A Returning Officer is answerable for administering the political decision in supporters, or once in a while in two electorates, as coordinated by the Election Commission (EC). The EC chooses the Returning Officer and Assistant Returning Officer for supporters in counsel with the administrations of the State or Union Territory all things considered. The Returning Officer's obligations incorporate tolerating and examining selection structures, distributing the testimonies of applicants, allocating images to the challenging up-and-comers, setting up the rundown of challenging competitors, setting up the EVMs and VVPATs, preparing surveying workforce, assigning tallying focuses, and checking the votes and proclaiming the outcome.

Thus, option (A) is correct.

Note: The head election official is given security of tenure. He can't be taken out from his office besides in a similar way and on similar grounds as an appointed authority of the Supreme Court. All in all, he can be taken out by the President based on a goal passed with that impact by both the Houses of Parliament with an extraordinary dominant part, either on the ground of demonstrated trouble making or insufficiency.